WHAT MAKES THE DIABETICS URINATE FREQUENTLY?

RECOGNITION OF DR. PALANI'S DISCOVERY MAY SAVE HUMANS FROM TYPE-2 DIABETES

Part-1: WHAT MAKES THE DIABETICS URINATE FREQUENTLY? WHY AND HOW DOES IT HAPPAN?

(© 15 November 2016: Dr. V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D.

e-Mail: vmpalaniappan@gmail.com; Mobile: 6-012-2071414.)

(The excellent platform provided by Googles is gratefully acknowledged)

You may want to view it yourself the nice Infographic by Siti Fatmah, released today (15 November 2015) by MIMS (Malaysia), entitled “The history of diabetes across the centuries” through the following URL:

http://today.mims.com/topic/infographic--the-history-of-diabetes-across-the-centuries-?country=Malaysia  &channel=gn-health-wellness&elq_mid=8165&elq_cid=4465
It appears an Egyptian Physician wrote for the first time some 3500 years ago about diabetes as a disease of frequent urination*.

(* According to the South Indian Siddha medicine, such a recognition dates back to 5000 years, and the diagnostic method they used had relevance to ants gathering around the sweet urine voided by the diabetics.)

Let me ask you this question:
Why should the brain induce frequent urination?

Please evaluate the above PHYSIOLOGY, comparing it with the following analogies:

(Analogy = When only one (or very few) aspect is comparable, it is called ANALOGY.
If ALL aspects are IDENTICAL, then it is called HOMOLOGY)

Analogy-1:

A mosquito injects into just one spot in your skin some concentrated venom.

That concentrate can kill all those cells at that spot.

Wanting to save the cells, the brain creates itch.

When it itches, you scratch.

The scratching disperses the venom to several adjacent cells, and that dilutes the venom, and thereby the venom loses its ‘power’ to kill the cells there.

Then, the itch stops.


Analogy-2: You keep sitting cross-legged for a long duration.

A while later the blood supply there will get impeded, and the resulting short-supply of oxygen can kill the tissues there.

To save the muscles, the brain creates a sensation of needle pricks.

This makes you massage that part of the body violently, and the free blood supply will resume. 

The pricking sensation too would stop immediately.                   

Analogy-3:

The dusts dispersed from a dusty carpet while cleaning it enter into your lungs, begin to irritate, and make you sneeze.

The sneezing is induced by the brain in order to remove those dust particles from blocking your breathing holes – the alveoli, thus saving your life from death due to choking.

Analogy-4:

Someone throws chilli powder into your eyes.

Your brain induces secretion of tears in large quantities. The purpose being to cleanse the tender eyes from getting severely damaged.

Analogy-5:

You see someone taking poison with the idea of committing suicide – may be because of his MIND is unable to withstand love failure.

The BRAIN does not want to accept death. SURVIVAL is its prime goal.

So, the brain induces PROFUSE SWEATING, and traces of the poison can be found dissolved in that sweat.

The brain induces uncontrollable urinations, and traces of the poison can be found dissolved in that urine.

The brain induces uncontrollable diarrhoea, and traces of the poison can be found mixed in that slimy faeces.

The brain induces shedding of tears, and traces of the poison can be found in that tears.

The brain induces running nose (sinusitis-like), and traces of the poison can be found in that slimy oozing liquid.

The brain gives him seizure (epilepsy), and that increases the blood pressure, which in turn enhances speedy transportation of the poison to all possible outlets for its elimination, before death could incur.

ALL THE ABOVE ARE BRAIN'S WAY OF SAVING THE BODY FROM DETERIORATION AND DEATH.

                                              *   *   *   *   *   *
Now, let us evaluate the occurrence of FREQUENT URINATIONS in TYPE-2 DIABETICS:

If you are a diabetic, your body voids plenty of urine frequently.

Why should your brain do that?

The brain wants to REMOVE ‘something’ that can either kill you, or damage your body severely.

That ‘something’ can be:

(a) the UNUTILISED SUGAR that keeps floating in your blood., or

(b) it can be any other POISON that has accumulated inside the body.

That sugar can ROT your (various) tissues, and eventually cause death*.

(* How exactly the Type-2 Diabetes develops?

Well, this aspect will be explained in PART-2 of this topic - that will be posted in due course.)

If that happens to be some kind of poison, that too can kill the tissues likewise.

Your brain wants to save you from that disaster, and therefore, induces frequent urinations ONLY IN ORDER TO REMOVE THAT UNUTILIZED SUGAR OR THE UNSUITABLE SOMETHING.

If tested, that something in the urine thus voided can be recognized.

 Now, what would happen if WE, by some means - may be with the use of some pharmaceutical DIURETICS drugs (such as Lasix Furosemide), induce MUCH MORE FREQUENT URINATIONS?

That unwanted and unsuitable ‘something’ + unutilized sugar would get leached out of the body rapidly (and fully), thus making the body RESTORE ITS FULL HEALTH.

Now, the question is, WHAT CAN BE THAT UNSUITABLE ‘SOMETHING’, and why or how do they accumulate to such enormous quantities?

To find the answer to this, we have to understand the body physiology of ALL ANIMALS on earth.

                                                     *   *   *   *   *   *

God, Nature, or the Process of Evolution has created a common feature in ALL animals – from tiny microorganism such as bacteria to 'giant-sized' elephants, or the most advanced humans:

Nature knows that our (or any animal’s) body would produce some end-products during the process of living.

These end products (e.g., carbon dioxide in plants and animals, faecal matter in animals) will have to be removed from the body, lest they would ruin their healthy existence.

Nature also knows that it is possible for the entry of exertional poisons into the body through water, air, and/or food.

In other words, one’s own poisons as well as those that may enter into the body from external sources will have to be removed on a regular basis.

Such a removal occurs through:

1. Defecation of faecal matter, and
2. Excretion of URINE.

We have learnt in Chemistry that each WATER-SOLUBLE substance has a definite SATURATION POINT – that is the capacity to dissolve in water.

Each toxic substance can have a different dissolving capacity.

To simplify the explanation, let us say, 5 teaspoons of poisons enter into our body through the air - being air-borne gaseous pollutants that may dissolve in water.

Another 5 teaspoons through the liquids / water (e.g., chlorine, preservatives in soft drinks, etc.).

Yet another 5 teaspoons through the food we eat (e.g., pesticides, preservatives, etc.)

These, making a total of 15 teaspoons, will have to be removed from the body daily, through URINATIONS.

Let us assume that only ONE teaspoon of the poisons would dissolve and get removed from the body in 100 ml of urine voided.

That (15 teaspoons of the poisons) may require a person to void 1500 ml of URINE.

If we drink 1 glass of water, some of it would get lost as sweat through the skin, as vapour from the expired air, from eye surface, and the like. As a result, 1 glass water intake may produce only ¾ glass of urine.

This would then mean that, if we want to void 1500 ml of urine, we may have to drink 2 L of water.

That is to say, if we drink 2 L of water daily, and URINATE 1.5 L of URINE also daily, then, ALL of the poisons may get out of our body, leaving it in a healthy state.

If, say, 200 ml of urine is excreted every time we void, then, we have to urinate 7½ times, or sensibly, about EIGHT TIMES DAILY.

At this, an important question arises:

What would happen if we do NOT urinate 8 times or 1500 ml of urine daily?

THE POISONS WOULD GET STAGNATED WITHIN THE BODY.

THAT WOULD KEEP ON ACCUMULATING TO ENORMOUS QUANTITIES, IF WE CONTINUE TO UNDER-URINATE!

Let us see what it can be:

In our example, 2 teaspoons of poison will get removed from the body through 1 urination of 200 ml.

If a person is going to drink 2 L of water, he must urinate 8 times to remove the whole lot of 15+ teaspoons of the poisons.

If a person urinates only THREE times daily, his body would throw out 600 ml of urine which will contain only SIX teaspoons of the poisons.

That means, about 10 teaspoons of the poisons would stay back within the body EACH DAY.

At this rate, in ONE YEAR his body would have accumulated (365 x 10) 3650 teaspoons of it.

This will be 36,500 teaspoons in 10 years.

Under normal circumstances, our (or any animal’s) body has tremendous tolerance limits for any adverse conditions.

I have found (clinically) that those who under-urinate this way – only thrice daily, to develop TYPE-2 DIABETES IN ABOUT 8 YEARS’ TIME*.

(* As indicated above, the exact sequence of type-2 diabetes development will be explained in Part-2 of this article, at a later date, in this Blog).

Based on our assumed quantifications, it appears that the tolerance limit for a person is to withstand some 30,000 teaspoons of the poison before he would turn into a Type-2 Diabetic patient.

Thus, if a person regularly urinates only TWICE daily*, the 30,000 tolerance limit would arrive at an earlier date – in about 5½ years’ time.

(* Mr. X was unemployed until his 25th age, so he has been urinating liberally, just by responding to the urge for urination.

Subsequently, he worked as a JUNIOR for next five years. He had adequate free time to urinate then and there.

In his 30, he was appointed an EXECUTIVE, and he became fully occupied with works, meetings, seminars, and the like that he had NO free time to frequent the toilet.

Further, if he urinates frequently, the staff there could mistake him to have had diabetes.

In addition, having become a highly paid executive, he has started drinking fruit juices and the like, rather than drinking plain water.

Thus, from his 30th year, he has REDUCED his urination frequency to just ONCE during office hours, and twice at home.

 The Air-Conditioner is his office DEHYDRATES (sucks most of his body water as an unrecognizable, 'insensible perspiration'). As a result, he does not get the urinal pressure any more. Further, only very little urine gets excreted.

His body begins to smell urine, which he does not recognise, but others do.

Since the 'toxic' substances are accumulating within his body (stored in the soft cells), he puts on weight. That, naturally, gets attributed to his becoming wealthy.

When he reaches 36, he goes for an EXECUTIVE MEDICAL CHECK-UP, since the medical bill is paid by his office. 

The doctor tells him he has developed TYPE-2 DIABETES!

About two decades ago, this disease was called Rich Man's Disease, or "Executive's Disease".

Nowadays, nearly all the office-going people tend to work in air-conditioner environment, and that makes nearly all of them diabetic!

I have found the following:

If you drink 2 L of water, and urinate about 8 times or so daily, you tend to remain HEALTHY all the time, in spite of taking sugary food and plenty of carbohydrates. 

From time immemorial, ALL people in the tropical countries have been eating RICE (carbohydrate) as their staple food, ate sugared snacks daily, and they never developed diabetes. 

The people belonging to COLD countries took meat mostly with wheat, essentially because rice would not grow in their land - imports and exports didn't exist during the ancient periods.

SUGAR IS NOT THE CULPRIT, BUT REDUCED WATER CONSUMPTION & UNDER-URINATION ARE!

If a person drinks 2L or MORE of water, and UNDER-URINATES (e.g., thrice or four times only) he develops just type-2 diabetes.

If he drinks very little water (e.g, just 200 or 300 ml) and therefore UNDER-URINATES, he appears to get HEART ATTACK & TYPE-2 DIABETES.

A person drinking only fruit juices, soft drinks, and soups (and NO water at all), AND UNDER-URINATES (about twice or thrice), tends to get CANCER.

He who does NOT drink any kind of liquid at all has been found to develop LEPROSY!
(Brain tries to remove from the body the much-concentrated poisons by rotting the tissues)

(I was able to completely cure a few leprosy patients, and the major part of the treatment included training the patient to drink water and void urine adequately, as part of the detoxification programme.)

He who urinates FOUR times daily, would become diabetic in about 11 years.

Thus, one urinating FIVE times daily, would get it in about 14 years’ time.

He who urinates SIX times, would turn diabetic only after about 22 years or so.

So, if a person wants to stay in a health state forever, without getting the type-2 diabetes, he should drink about 2 L of water (not soft drinks, juices, soups, etc.), and urinate about 8 times daily.

                                                  *   *   *   *   *   *
I have conveniently skipped explaining as how does the brain work in this case to induce the type-2 diabetes, and WHAT EXACTLY THAT POISON IS.

Similar to the examples explained as ANALOGIES above, when the body accumulates poisons beyond its tolerance limit - the “threshold point”, the BRAIN induces / forces / compels  the body parts to EXCRETE urine FREQUENTLY, so that all the accumulated poisons would get removed from the body, allowing it to be in ‘relatively’ a healthy state.

The term ‘relatively’ has some relevance:

If ALL the 30,000 teaspoons of the poisons get stagnated within the body - exceeding the body’s tolerance limit, then the body WOULD STRAIGHT AWAY:

(a) Begin to rot and decompose giving rise to gangrene.

(b) The eyes would develop cataract and go blind.

(c) The penis would develop erectile dysfunction (impotency) and turn the person sterile.

(d) The nerves would collapse, and lose its function, and

(e) The entire body too would collapse, resulting in the DEATH of that person soon.

On the other hand, if the brain can induce the occurrence of Type-2 Diabetes which is linked with increased and frequent urination THAT would eliminate substantial quantities of poisons from the accumulated 30,000 teaspoons. This would then keep the person ALIVE for several more years, instead of an instant death.

(The development of type-2 diabetes can be categorized as an auto-immune disease, very much similar to osteoporosis.)

                                                    *   *   *   *   *   *

Well Friends,

I hope you are able to realize the facts related to Type-2 Diabetes.

In brief, it is the HABITUAL UNDER-URINATION that gives rise to Type-2 Diabetes, and this has absolutely NOTHING to do with eating too much of sugar or carbohydrates!

Since the Medical Fraternity has missed to understand this phenomenon, they are not only NOT able to CURE the Type-2 Diabetes, but are unable to even CONTROL it. That is precisely why the number of sufferers has been going higher and higher along with time.

YOU CAN NEVER-EVER SUCCEED UNLESS MY FINDING IS RECOGNISED.
ONLY THE WHO (World Health Organisation) CAN HELP THE HUMANITY AT LARGE!

May I therefore urge Dr. Margaret Chan - the Director General of WHO to quickly recognise me.

Since we cannot expect Dr. Margaret Chan, as the DG of WHO, to read this kind of BLOG-posted articles, only those who happen to read my (this) article & this BLOG, should take up the matter to the DG's attention, so that the millions world-wide can be saved at once.

In the name of GOD, may I request every Reader of this article to do his/her best to help humanity.

I will soon post my SECOND PART of this article that would explain in exact terms the POISON that give rise to Type-2 diabetes.

With thanks and best wishes,
Dr. Palani, Ph.D.

THE W.H.O. SHOULD EVALUATE A DISCOVERY THAT CAN ERADICATE ALL MAJOR DISEASES

THE W.H.O. SHOULD EVALUATE A DISCOVERY THAT CAN ERADICATE ALL MAJOR DISEASES.

(© 30 September 2015: Dr. V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D.) 

Of late, I have been undergoing tremendous ‘frustration’ because my highly beneficial ‘breakthrough’ contributions to humanity are not getting recognized by any of the people related to human welfare – essentially, the mainstream medical fraternity – the World Health Organization included.

As if God showed me the way, while I was re-arranging my home-library, I ‘stumbled’ upon one of Eugene Garfield’s articles - “Current Comments” entitled “DELAYED RECOGNITION IN SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY” (Current Contents, 1989).

That gave me a tremendous consolation.

It occurred to me that highlighting his findings would bring me to the limelight – at least NOW – after some 17 years of my publication, a book (Palaniappan, 1998) that was considered “a masterpiece of the 20^th century” only by a few who gained access to it at that time.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Dr. Eugene Garfield, is best known as the Founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), who was a pioneer in the field of citation analysis, and whose data bases have now become the online research tool of the “Web of Knowledge” (Infoplease, 2007),

His regular publication Current Contents, considered a best source of information for all researchers for a very long time, used to contain his “Current Comments” – well-researched, thought-provoking articles.

While being an academic in University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, I used to be a regular follower of his contributions. I still have reprints of several of his works.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Garfield talks of DELAYED RECOGNITION IN SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY:

“I am sure”, Garfield says, “that many CC (Current Contents) readers can think of colleagues who have been instrumental in their field but whose citation record does not adequately reflect their impact. This lack of explicit recognition may be due to the vagaries (unpredictable / eccentric) of citation behavior”

“… many of these cases are  - in fact – examples of the widespread phenomenon of DELAYED RECOGNITION …”

Garfield defines it, along with several other phenomena, citing various others, in the following manner:

Sociologist Stephen Cole, then in the State University of New York, appears to have been the first one who suggested the term “DELAYED RECOGNITION”

Bernard Barber in Columbia University, New York, is said to have called such cases “RESISTED DISCOVERIES”.

Gunther S. Stent from University of California in Berkeley had called them “PREMATURE DISCOVERY”.

Barber and Stent appeared to have emphasized in their papers that DISCOVERIES THAT WERE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCEPTED KNOWLEDGE AT THE TIME OR NOT VERIFIABLE TECHNOLOGICALLY WOULD EXPERIENCE THE DELAYED PHENOMENON.

“DELAYED RECOGNITION PAPERS ARE THOSE THAT ARE INITIALLY UNAPPRECIATED OR UNUSED BUT ARE LATER RECOGNISED AS SIGNIFICANT”

“…delayed recognition may occur over centuries, decades, or a few years. The most famous case of delayed recognition is that of Gregor Mendel, with a time delay of 35 years.

(In my case, it (the delay) is 40 years, with effect from 1975 - Dr.Palani)

Garfield writes further:

“Recognition is one of the most valued rewards of science. It often is confirmed exclusively on the individual or team responsible for a particular breakthrough.

“These fortunate few certainly deserve the media attention and awards that come with the success of discovery.”

“It is almost impossible to identify useful, important, yet unrecognized papers by any but highly subjective evaluation, but we can recognize a special class of undervalued papers – those that were recognized long after they were published. Such papers represent DELAYED RECOGNITION and sometimes are associated with PREMATURE DISCOVERY.” 

“… PREMATURE DISCOVERY IS A SUBJECT OF DELAYED RECOGNITION.

“A definition, according to Stent, is that the discovery “was not appreciated in its day.

“By lack of appreciation I do not mean that the discovery went unnoticed … What I do mean is that scientists did not seem to be able to do much with it or build on it.

“This can occur when the contemporaneous knowledge, technology, and social issues prevent the discovery from being extended experimentally or applied to other related scientific efforts.” 

(If and when my discovery gets recognised, the world economy may collapse, for one-third of the world population is said to be depending upon the main stream medical fraternity, for their bread and butter, directly or indirectly - Dr. Palani)

Garfield adds on:

According to William Goffman in Cleveland’s Case Western Reserve University and Kenneth S. Warren of the Rockefeller Foundation in New York,

“…A STRONG PRESUMPTION PREVAILS THAT ANY EVIDENCE THAT CONTRADICTS THE ACCEPTED VIEW IS INVALID AND MUST BE DISREGARDED…”

It seems, Barber had well defined in 1961 itself about the topic of resistance by scientists to new discoveries (especially those that challenge commonly held percepts).

(I have found that salt is totally harmless, sugar does not give rise to type-2 diabetes, and excessive calcium is the one that contributes to obesity, and nearly ALL major diseases, including cancer, diabetes, heart and stone diseases  - Dr.Palani)

Likewise, if one does not follow the well-ploughed path of presentation of his/her discoveries, the chances of those findings getting totally ignored appear to be great.

The fact that a particular research is done in a deviated manner from the so-called ‘norm’, should, by right, be considered to show the extra capabilities and exceptional talent of the researcher.

Again, Eugene Garfield’s (1989) another thought-provoking article entitled “ The Process of Scientific Discovery” has brought to recognition my kind of approach.

*   *   *   *   *   *

I have one big question for the following master minds in the area of innovative literature search:

• The dynamic Dr. Eugene Garfield, who I believe, still has the passion for constant improvement of his favorite discipline.
  
  
• The President of the Dutch Systems Group Society, and the the Derek de Solla Price Award for Scientometrics recipient, Professor Dr. Loet Leydesdorff.
  
  
• The great academic, and SPARC Innovative Award Winner, Professor, Dr.Carl Bergstrom.
  
  
• The great CHI Founder and an earlier-day winner of the Derek de Solla Price Medal Award, Dr. Francis Narin.  
  
  
• The Rudy Professor Emeritus of Information Service, and Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of the American Society for Information Service, Dr. Blaise Cronin.
  
  
• The Cognitive Scientist Dr. Stevan Robert Hamad.
  
  
• Physicist and the popular inventor of the n-index for quantifying a scientist’s publication productivity, Professor Jorge E. Hirsch.
  
  
• The Sociologist who introduced the concept of multiple discover, Professor Emerita, Dr. Harriet Zuckerman.
  
  
  (If all of MY discovery published in 1998 (and subsequent years) in the form of a book with proper ISBN reference and the like) is considered to constitute 100%, recent scientists from different parts of the world have been publishing these days bits and pieces of my findings (amounting to 5 or 6 percent of my works) as if theirs is the first-time report (may not form plagiarisms), simply because they have not seen my publications – for want of adequate citations and publicity, especially because I do not belong to the mainstream medical fraternity. Thus, my findings tend, erroneously, to form a one of the multiple discoveries.) 

I have been trying for the past 39 years, through multivariate means, to get my findings recognized. None of them brought me any success.

Could you people kindly evaluate my works, and do the needful to bring them to recognition soon, so that the suffering millions worldwide can be saved from nearly all of the diseases, thus making their life on earth more pleasant, contributive and meaningful.

I will be happy to forward you some of my books, especially the one entitled “The True Causes of All Diseases” (Palaniappan, 2008).

Two others of my 20 books, viz., “Diabetes: Causes, Cure and Prevention” (2010), and “All about obesity in a nutshell” (2013) would also convince you of the usefulness of my contributions.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Let me introduce myself to all those who do not know me, very briefly:

• My brief biodata may be seen towards the end of this article
  
  
• Importantly: I have pioneered and found a ‘breakthrough’, science-based, drugless, alternative medicine called “Ecological Healing System”, “EcoTherapy”, for short, and this has the potentials for curing/ preventing nearly all of the non-communicable, and also most of communicable diseases, including cancers, diabetes, stone diseases, asthma, epilepsy, leprosy, besides many of the virus-caused communicable ones.
  
  
• Medical journals rejected my articles since they do not conform with the mainstream medical beliefs. Hence, I have published all my findings as books. More details may be seen in my Biodata.

• My findings are not getting recognized – recognition is getting delayed: essentially because the information extremely is contradictory to the hitherto accepted views – challenging the commonly held precepts. Therefore, this has become a RESISTED DISCOVERY as well.
• 
  
• I need immediate recognition, before it becomes too late, for humans worldwide require urgent help to rid of their life-threatening and suffocating diseases.
• 
  
• My findings, being the truth, will certainly get recognized in course of time. However, as of today, it appears to be a PRE-MATURE DISCOVERY. 

*   *   *   *   *   *

Do you know what are all my BREAKTHROUGH FINDINGS  I have reported in all of my PUBLICATIONS (20 books +167 articles + 305 blog postings) so far, starting from 1975

Let me highlight some of them here, in a condensed form – these are points I have pointed out in my recent letter to various Authorities related to World Health Organization (W.H.O) recently:

(I have previously posted the following article in this blog. Some of you must have read this earlier: pardon me if you think I am repeating it here. However, I think, it should be worthwhile reading it again.)

A NOVEL APPROACH FOR

THE PREVENTION AND/OR  A CURE OF

MORBID OBESITY AND ALL RELATED DISEASES,

INCLUDING TYPE-2 DIABETES, CANCERS AND LEPROSY.

By

Dr. V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D., (Former Associate Professor, University of Malaya), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. (Mobile: 6-012-207 1414; Fax/Tel: 6-03-624 234 14)

(e-Mail: vmpalaniappan@gmail.com; Blog: http//ecohealingsystem.blogspot.com)

Medical facilities in Malaysia and all developed and fast-developing countries for health management are at their best now, like never before.

In spite of it, the alarming increase in the number of TYPE-2 DIABETES sufferers, along with a few other major diseases such as cancers and stone diseases, tends to indicate the possible existence of some detrimental or misunderstood risk factors.

Failure to recognize the correct causative factors can very well be the major reason for such a misery.

One crucial causative factor that has been completely misunderstood appears to be related to the DAMAGING effects caused by CALCIUM EXCESSES.

Since calcium forms the basic substance for the buildup of human body, it has been hitherto considered that even unlimited quantities of the substance would only do good deeds to a person.

Such a notion appears to have been intensely spoiling the health status of the entire world population, to varying degrees.

It is common knowledge that “anything in excess will be (doubtlessly) dangerous, and calcium excess cannot be an exception to this rule.

*    *    *    *    *    *

I have found, based on my 39 years of ecologically-oriented, evidence-based scientific research, that the ACCUMULATION OF EXCESSIVE FREE CALCIUM ALONE AS THE SINGLE MAJOR CAUSATIVE FACTOR that is responsible for MOST of the major health disasters. The TYPE-2 DIABETES and CANCERS happen to be two of them.

Let me briefly summarize here some of MY ultimate findings:

1.    Those who drink plenty of water (e.g., 2 L or more, daily), urinate nearly all of it (e.g., about 90% of the consumed water, through some 8 urinations or so, daily, so that the Liquid Input/Urine Output Ratio stands at <1.2), and consume MEDIOCRE quantities of food, tend to remain in excellent health, with a thin body. (They do get only common cold once or twice a year, and this is considered a necessity for the balancing of body fluid reactions, viz., the pH). Such people belong to “Perfect Category”, as per my classification of world people (Palaniappan, 1998, 2000).

Women of this “Perfect category” appear to be developing SMALL BREASTS.

2.    People practicing all as in 1, but consume TOO MUCH of FOOD, tend to become clumsily obese, and live WITHOUT any of the major diseases.  

3. Those people who habitually drink plenty of water (e.g., 2 to 4 L or so / day), and under-urinate (e.g., about 300 ml, or so / day, through about three urinations, all the time, for  varied reasons), appear to be getting BIG-SIZED BODY, and TYPE-2 DIABETES, in a few years’ time.

4.    Those who drink very little water (about 400 ml of water/ juices/ soft drinks), and UNDER-urinate (about 300 ml or so, through two to three urinations), and also eat PLENTY of food rapidly without chewing, end up being HUGE-bodied persons (much bigger for their ethnic kind). They turn EXCESSIVELY OVER-WEIGHT, and develop HYPOTHYROIDISM, HEART and STONE diseases, and also TYPE-2 DIABETES (Palaniappan, 1998, 2001, 2013.).

This group of people almost NEVER gets any of the virus infections, including common cold, due to the immunity provided by the calcium excesses*. I recognize them as “Obesity Type-4” people.

(* I have found that it is CALCIUM that provides immunity against virus infections.)

The importance of under-urination as a risk-factor for major diseases, as per my findings, measures to  24% in men, and 21% in women (Palaniappan, 2013).

5.    All those practicing as in 4 above, but eat VERY LITTLE FOOD, end up being THIN and VERY TALL. Both men and women look pretty and very attractive. (Most of the movie stars and beauty contestants tend to come under this category). I recognize them as Pseudo Slim people.

All the Pseudo-slim women, almost without exception, appear to be developing BIG BREASTS (Palaniappan, 2012)

*    *    *    *    *    *

At this juncture, I have to draw your special attention to another extremely very important causative factor, besides the role of urine in the development of major diseases.

The shape or structure of the faeces appears to determine to a significant extent the occurrences of diseases in a person. Thus, this forms an ADDITIONAL major DISEASE CAUSING risk factor.

The SHAPELESSLESSNESS of the FAECES defecated (i.e., the sliminess, or slightly-watery stools, recognized as chronic constipation by me, and as diarrhoea by the mainstream Western medicine), appears to play slightly a greater role (28% in both genders) than under-urination in causing the major diseases (Palaniappan, 2008, 2013).

The above results due to the following phenomenon:

Under normal circumstances, some 70 to 80% of the CALCIUM present in the consumed vegetable matter goes out of the body in an unabsorbed* state.

(* To my understanding, it is the brain, with a view to protecting the body from getting calcium over-dosed (similar to the function of Calcitonin that regulates the calcium composition in the blood, so as to maintain the blood at pH7.4, or so) rejects the 70 – 80% of the calcium excesses present in the consumed vegetables.

If, for instance, the body required such enormous amounts of calcium, the brain, by secreting some extra digestive enzyme, could have enhanced its absorption at a higher location in the gastro-intestinal tract itself, rather than allowing to get it thrown out of the body as part of the faeces waste.

This process appears to indicate that too much of calcium is not wanted for the body’s betterment.)

The alkaline nature of the faeces (due to calcium) keeps it in a consolidated solid state, and not slimy.

At this, if we eat a diet that is extremely HIGH in its FIBRE CONTENT, or If we eat any OVER-RIPE FRUIT, especially PAPAYA, or certain 'EATABLES' such as BISCUITS, CHOCOLATES, PEANUTS, pastries, and the like, then, the FAECES (present in the COLON) turns SLIMY.

This RELEASES the hither-to unutilised calcium as a FREE substance.

The adenomatous glandular cells at the lining of the COLON absorb this FREED calcium.

In other words, the UNWANTED calcium, gets absorbed into the body - thus becoming too much of the UNWANTED EXCESS.

Due to UNDER URINATION, the unwanted water-borne calcium became unavoidably retained within the body (in various cells of the soft tissues/organs).

Something like 'adding insult to injury', the calcium from the FAECAL matter now gets ADDED up to FURTHER INCREASE the UNWANTED calcium BULK.

As a result of these two phenomenon, the situation tends to turn worse:

For want of choice, the brain appears to allow the ‘retention’ of these calcium excesses in the form of lumps, cysts, fibroids, spurs, tumours, and cancers.

This situation tends to ESTABLISH the Type-2 diabetes, or, it enhances an increase in the blood serum sugar content in the already-established  Type-2 Diabetic people whenever they consume sugar (e.g., table sugar - sucrose, for instance) (Palaniappan, 2011).

Needless to repeat that the development of hypothyroidism, stone and vascular diseases, and the like occur due to the accumulation of such calcium excesses (Palaniappan, 1998).

*   *   *    *    *    *

Apart from the above two, what I have described as “Erroneous Eating Habit” (which comprises of excessive food consumption) contributes 26% to the Morbid Obesity problem.

Eating calcium-ENRICHED food items and/or calcium SUPPLEMENTS form the remaining 22%.

*   *   *    *    *    *

THUS, the FOUR major factors that are responsible for Morbid Obesity and nearly all of the major diseases appear to be (Palaniappan, 2013):

1. UNDER-URINATION (24%),

2. DEFECATING SLIMY FAECES (28%),

3. EATING TOO MUCH OF FOOD (26%), and

4. CONSUMING CALCIUM-ENRICHED ITEMS (22%)

*   *    *    *   *    *

CORRECTION OF THESE FAULTS CAN PREVENT, AND ALSO POSSIBLY CURE, MORBID OBESITY AND ALL THE RELATED DISEASES (Palaniappan, 1998-2013).

*    *    *    *   *    *

Full descriptions of all the above details have been recorded with statistics in 13 of the 20 books I have so far written / published.

My latest book “All about obesity in a nutshell” (2013) contains an excellent summary of the numerous findings I have hitherto made.

This book alone, if not, in combination with another of my books “The true causes of all diseases” (2008), has all the potentials to change the entire world of its health disasters.   

References 

• Garfield, Eugene, (1989a). Current comments: Delayed recognition in scientific discovery: citation frequency analysis aids the search for case histories. Current Contents. ISI, 20, 23: pp2-9.  
• Garfield, Eugene (1989b). Creativity and Science. Part-2. The Process of Scientific Discovery. ISI, 20, 45. Pp.3-9. 
• Google search for various scientists: : https://www.google.com.my/?gws_rd=cr,ssl&ei= C8swVIua BtieugT5hYC4DA#q=derek+j.+de+solla+price&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAGOovnz8BQMDgw YHsx Cnfq6-gUlBZYWBEoSZXVRWpsUXkFpUnJ8XnJmSWp5YWcz3VUm7tkZWdcHrOMb5Dz 5aLW9Y uA4A7hNthUUAAAA
   Inforplease (2007). Information please database, Pearson Education, Inc. Eugene Garfield  Biography (Scientist/Publisher)|Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease. com/biography/ var/ eugenegarfield.html#ixzz3FDPLDN3z   
• 
  
• Palaniappan, V.M. (1998). Ecological Healing System - Theses And Hypotheses-I:   OBESITY: CAUSES, PREVENTION AND CURES. Ecohealth S/B., ISBN 967-9988-05-8.471pp    
• Palaniappan, V.M. (2000).  Ecological Healing System – Ii:  HEALTH PROBLEMS: DIAGNOSE YOURSELF.  Ecohealth Sdn. Bhd. ISBN 967-9988-06-6.  148pp
   Palaniappan, V.M. (2000).  Ecological Healing System – Iii: YOUR SEX POTENTIALS. Ecohealth Sdn. Bhd.  ISBN 967-9988-07-4. 181pp 
• 
  
•  Palaniappan, V.M. (2001).  Ecological Healing System – Iv: HEART PROBLEMS, DIABETES, AND RELATED DISEASES. Ecohealth Sdn. Bhd. ISBN 967-9988-08-2.  286pp  
• Palaniappan, V.M. (2001).  Ecological Healing System – Vi: ASTHMA, BRONCHITIS, COUGH, SNEEZING AND SWEATING. Ecohealth Sdn. Bhd.  ISBN 967-9988-09-0.  144pp   
• Palaniappan, V.M. (2005). HAIR PROBLEMS: CAUSES, CURE, AND PREVENTION. 285-pages Book. Published by Ecohealth  Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur.  
• Palaniappan, V.M. (2007). SEX PROBLEMS: CAUSES, CURE AND PREVENTION. ISBN 978-967-9988-11-6.  224pp Neo Health Care Pub., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 
• Palaniappan, V.M. (2007). HUMAN DISEASES”. ISBN 978-967-9988-12-3. 336pp Neo Health Care Pub., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.  
• Palaniappan, V.M. (2008). THE TRUE CAUSES OF ALL DISEASES. ISBN 978-967-9988-13-0. 192pp Neo Health Care Pub., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.   
• Palaniappan, V.M. (2010). CANCER: CAUSES, CURE AND PREVENTION.   ISBN 978-967-9988-14-7. 624 pages Neo Health Care Pub., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.  
• Palaniappan, V.M. (2011). DIABETES: CAUSES, CURE AND PREVENTION. ISBN978-967-9988-15-4. 256pp. Neo Health Care Pub.,, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.  
• Palaniappan, V.M. (2012). MENSES, MENOPAUSE, AND OSTEOPOROSIS. Neo Health Care. 144pp; ISBN 978-967-9988-17-8).  
• Palaniappan, V.M (2013). ALL ABOUT OBESITY, IN A NUTSHELL. Neo Health Care. 221pp; ISBN 978-967-9988-18-5. 
• Palaniappan, V.M. 2014, since 2009:  BLOG, INTERNET: http://ecohealingsystem.blogspot. com/  Published 287 ORIGINAL ARTICLES In the area Of Ecological Healing System (EcoTherapy). 87,000 page views.
  
  
• Palaniappan, V.M. 1967-2014: 167 ARTICLES in multivariate media (Journals, Conferences, Seminars, Magazines, Newspapers, Radio, and T.V. talk presentations.)

If you want to buy any of the above books, you may want to contact Mr. PUMA BALA, my book distributor in Malaysia. His mobile: 012-270 5172.

People in Singapore can contact me through my e-mail: vmpalaniappan@gmail.com.

People elsewhere, please do contact me, and we'll try to find a way to solve the problem.

However, the one book that is available in Amazon.com & as a Kindle e-book will be:

The True Causes of All Diseases.

**************

Thank you friends, for reading this posting.

With best wishes,

Dr. Palani, Ph.D.