MORE TOWARDS SOLVING A GENETIC MYSTERY IN TYPE-1 DIABETES

	MORE TOWARDS SOLVING A GENETIC MYSTERY IN TYPE-1 DIABETES (© 13 April 2016: Dr.V.M.Palaniappan, Ph.D.)  Large number of medical researchers must have read with great interest the following article that appeared in Medical Xpress (April,11, 2016), and earlier on in Genes and Immunology.  Even before we can discuss my ADDITIONAL, but EARLIER input into this area of research, it would make things easier for non-medical people to understand this very important problem to read the introductory part of what has been published in Medical Xpress: (http://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-04-genetic-mystery-diabetes.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=ctgr-item&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter): Solving a genetic mystery in type 1 diabetes According to Stephan Kissler, Ph.D., Investigator in the Section on Immunobiology at Joslin Diabetes Center and Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School (Originally published in: Genes and Immunology): In type 1 diabetes, the immune system attacks the body's own insulin-producing cells. Scientists  don't understand what triggers the attack or how to stop it Now the Kissler lab has shown one way in which one such gene, called RGS1, may help to foster the autoimmune attack. In the attack, immune cells called T cells infiltrate the pancreas and damage the insulin-producing beta cells. Inhibiting RGS1 didn't prevent autoimmune diabetes from happening … in humans … We're continuing to test a number of other genes to see if one strikes us as being a very potent modifier of type 1 diabetes … … this piece of information about RGS1 might become valuable down the line when we know more about other genes… ******** Let me simplify the entire matter, by avoiding the use of too many medical terms, for the benefit of our Blog Readers:  For that matter, even the medical researchers should read this, for the information contained in this throws light on the possibility of a complete cure of the problem.  For a while, let us keep away the intrinsic details concerning the   genes and genetics. Let us talk of what we can understand at ease:  We are very much aware that there are few types in Diabetes:  1.    Type-1 diabetes mellitus, also called Juvenile Diabetes (in the past) or Insulin-Dependent Diabetes mellitus. 2.    Type-2 diabetes mellitus, also called Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. 3.    Diabetes insipidus, characterised by frequent urination. 4.    Pregnancy diabetes, also called Gestational diabetes, and 5.    Drug-induced diabetes.  Certain cells called Beta cells that are present in Pancreas secrete Insulin hormone.  Insulin digests sugar (carbohydrates).  If Insulin production is LESS, all the eaten sugar will not get digested. This results in type-2 diabetes.  To keep the sugar (carbohydrates) digestion in order, insulin supplements are given to the patient, in the form of drugs.  If insulin is given as a supplement from external sources, then there is no need for the Beta cells in the Pancreas even to try to secrete insulin.  (When such a thing occurs in the Thyroid gland, that is, if the thyroxin secretion is NOT enough, then the Thyroid STIMULATING Hormone (TSH) is secreted. THAT induces the gland to secrete MORE thyroxin.)  When it comes to diabetes, there is NO such thing as ‘Insulin STIMULATING hormone’.   However, the sugar WE EAT as part of the food works as Insulin Stimulating Hormone.  In other words, If we eat normal amount of sugar, normal amount of insulin secretes.  If we REDUCE sugar consumption, Insulin secretion also gets reduced.  If we INCREASE sugar uptake, insulin secretion INCREASES proportionately.  This is how the pancreas functions.  *********** Problem would arise if and when abnormal happenings occur.  Like everything else, our body has an optimum / best RANGE when it concerns SUGAR REQUIREMENT.  There is a minimum and maximum for such sugar requirements.  If and when we consume MUCH LESS sugar than the MINIMUM, we become totally energyless, and we can faint, and can even die.  At the other extreme, if and when we consume TOO MUCH sugar than the MAXIMUM our body can tolerate, that too can make us die.  If we consume MUCH LESS sugar, our brain does the following to make us consume MORE sugar, in order to save us from ultimate death.  It makes us feel energyless and exhausted. Our brain gives us a strong desire to eat sugar – a craving occurs. When we eat, the craving stops.  If we OVER-CONSUME TOO MUCH of sugar, our body does the following, in order to save us from ultimate death:  To start with we get the feeling of ENJOYMENT while eating sugar. It is pleasurable.  Once the NEED for sugar is over, we FEEL SATISFIED. So, we want to stop eating more of the sugar.  If we continued eating sugar, then our brain gives us a feeling of HATE. We hate to eat more sugar – we get disgusted, in spite of that food being delicious.  At this stage, let us say some one forces us at gun-point to eat still more sugar.  If and when we eat more, our brain makes us VOMIT, just to save us from the ultimate danger of death.  Our brain, instead of making us vomit, could have simply increased the insulin production to solve the problem at least as a temporary measure.  In reality, the brain does that too, but only as a temporary measure.  However, if we keep on continuing the eating of more and more sugar, and if ALL such sugars are digested with abundant insulin secretion, then the FAR TOO MUCH OF THE DIGESTED SUGAR will kill the cells and us, ultimately - the tissues would rot - similar to the GANGRENE that occurs in the long-term diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood sugar levels all the time, necessitating the amputation of the toes or lower part of the leg.  So, there is a definite need for the brain to totally put a full stop to the eating of too much of sugar.  The brain, since time immemorial, from the time of becoming Homo sapiens from being Apes, or even before that, has associated SWEET TASTE to SUGARS.  In other words, if SUGAR does NOT TASTE sweet, then our brain will NOT induce the secretion of Insulin.  The taste buds in the tongue, the brain, the pancreas, etc. are well inter-connected, inter-dependent, and remain well-coordinated, helped by SALT (Sodium) in its capacity as an essential ELECTROLYTE.  Since a century, Man (not any other animal) has become so intelligent that he has developed capabilities to HIDE the sweet taste from being felt by the taste buds in the tongue*.  (* Similar to adding a likeable perfume to the poisonous mosquito or cockroach killer poison, the original smell of which is extremely bad and repulsive. We would avoid inhaling bad smell, whereas we would  inhale much deeply if perfumed. That results in poisoning our brain and body.)    If for instance, sugar is filled inside CAPSULES, and if the capsules are just gulped, instead of chewing, then our brain will have no knowledge of the entry of THAT sugar into the body.   As a result, brain may not induce insulin secretion, and THIS encapsulated sugar will NOT get digested.   So, the undigested sugar will have to keep floating in the body fluids, doing all possible damages for the well-being of the body*.  (* Swallowing food without chewing will be similar to consuming capsules.  This is one of the major reasons why we must chew our food before swallowing.    In fact, I have recorded that nearly ALL the type-2 diabetic people do NOT chew their food, but gulp them rapidly: see Palaniappan, V.M., 1998. Obesity: Causes, Cure, and Prevention. ISBN 967-9988-0508. 471pp.)  In theory:   If we happen to consume all sugars only in the form of capsules, or if we SWALLOW our food rapidly all the time, as described above, our brain will have no knowledge of the ‘smuggled’ sugar, and thereby loses its management potentials. In other words, our brain gets deceived*.  (* This would happen to Astronauts, if they depend upon encapsulated diet for their survival.)  As a result, FAR TOO MUCH OF SUGAR ends up within the body, and disproportionate insulin quantities leave them to float in the blood in an undigested manner.  This can bring about the death of the cells and the person, as described above.  AT THIS, AN EMERGENCY TO SAVE THE BODY FROM DEATH HAS RISEN!  What can be done?  The best possible measure appears to be a TOTAL STOPPAGE OF THE INSULIN PRODUCTION!  Thus, TWO emergency situations can warrant instantaneous stoppage of insulin production:  1.    When a person consumes awful lot of sugars (recognisable by the taste buds in the tongue), almost non-stop, beyond the body’s tolerance limit, thus inducing the secretion of TOO MUCH of insulin -, beyond the true need.  2.    When sugar is pumped into the body in a hidden state, essentially due to gulping the food without chewing*.  (* 'Pumping' glucose into the body, avoiding the buccal and gastro-intestinal channel, for longer durations would equal this.) Irrespective of the mode of sugar entry, if there happens to be too much of sugar within the body, the best way appears to be a TOTAL STOPPAGE of insulin secretion.  If and when THAT happens, the person gets TYPE- 1 DIABETES.   WE SIMPLY CALL THIS LIFE-SAVING HELP RENDERED BY THE BRAIN AN "AUTO-IMMUNE DISEASE".     IF SUCH AN 'AUTO-IMMUNE DISEASE' DOES NOT HAPPEN, WE WOULD DIE!   THAT BEING THE CASE, INSTEAD OF CALLING IT AN AUTO-IMMUNE DISEASE, WE SHOULD CALL IT "ALTERNATIVE LIFE SAVING MEASURE", RATHER THAN CALLING IT A DISEASE. ******   In Type-I diabetes, if the Beta cells in the Pancreas are NOT dead yet (if it is an early stage), then a REVERSAL should be possible.  In Type II, where the Beta cells are alive but it is only question of LESSER insulin secretion, then a REVERSAL appears to be almost DEFINITELY POSSIBLE.  *********** What I have explained above is all that happens at MACRO-level.  However, if you want to go academic, and if we are to trace the detailed changes at ‘micro-‘ or even at ‘ultra-micro level’ (similar to seeing detailed cellular structures through an electron microscope), then of course, we have to recognise the sequences related to the genes and their interplay.  It would be even more interesting to see the sequence at ‘Nano’ levels.  Irrespective of the approach, the result will be the same.  At macro-level, it would be simple to understand and practise, but will be unimpressive, and may appear as ‘unscientific’.   The other academic approach will be extremely impressive, and much complicated to understand, but will form a necessity for academic excellence. The Ph.D candidates will have to be trained this way to think and interpret information much intricately.  Unfortunately, we do not seem to have much time to wait any further, particularly because the sufferings and the rate of death due to diabetes alone (besides the health-care expenditures), appear to be crossing over the bearable limits of nearly all the nations around the world.  ******** We need to address this issue somewhat ungently.   It should not matter who does the job. Egoism, professional protectionism, so-called medical ethics, etc. should be kept aloof.  It should not matter which discipline of medicine helps to achieve success. All we need is a successful stoppage of the problem, if possible, all at once.  In the first place, WHY IS IT THAT ALL THE RESEARCH FINDINGS DONE HITHERTO WORLD-WIDE DO NOT SEEM TO HAVE THE POTENTIALS TO ERADICATE THE DISEASE?  It should be because, the APPROACH TO SOLVING THE PROBLEM may not be correct.  If the CORRECT PROCEDURE is written in a gold plate and is buried in the South Pole, all the researchers appear to have been digging the soil in the North Pole. This way, they can never find even after a century - the result can be chaotic and disastrous.   In spite of being a non-medical research scientist, I have found the correct procedure for a total prevention and complete cure of the problem – Type-2 Diabetes, in particular.  Of course, my procedure is bound to be VERY HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL - essentially because of its deviation from prevailing norm. I can very easily do identical kind research work similar to all other researchers, and come up with identical kind of answers, and say that  one should do exercises, avoid sugar consumption, and reduce obesity. This would then CONFORM to what has already been found by a million scientists around the world. Yet, it would never yield any beneficial result, except that I will not be criticised!  Is that my purpose?   I am not expecting a promotion in my workplace, and therefore, I do not need to be scared of criticisms.  I am objective-oriented.   I feel the purpose of my existence is to save mankind at this juncture. God has given me the knowledge. A workable approach will certainly be unique, unusual, abnormal, and will NOT conform to the non-working approaches that are being repeatedly said by others.  ************ Gunther S. Stent from University of California in Berkeley calls my kind of report as “PREMATURE DISCOVERY”. He, along with his colleague Barber, emphasizes in their paper that discoveries that were not consistent with the accepted knowledge at the time or not verifiable technologically would experience the delayed phenomenon. “delayed recognition papers are those that are initially unappreciated or unused but are later recognized as significant”  Dr. Eugene Garfield, Founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), who was a pioneer in the field of citation analysis, and whose data bases have now become the online research tool of the “Web of Knowledge” (Infoplease, 2007), writes:  “Recognition is one of the most valued rewards of science. It often is confirmed exclusively on the individual or team responsible for a particular breakthrough. “These fortunate few certainly deserve the media attention and awards that come with the success of discovery.” “It is almost impossible to identify useful, important, yet unrecognized papers by any but highly subjective evaluation, but we can recognize a special class of undervalued papers – those that were recognized long after they were published. Such papers represent DELAYED RECOGNITION and sometimes are associated with PREMATURE DISCOVERY.”  “… PREMATURE DISCOVERY IS A SUBJECT OF DELAYED RECOGNITION. “A definition, according to Stent, is that the discovery “was not appreciated in its day. “This can occur when the contemporaneous knowledge, technology, and social issues prevent the discovery from being extended experimentally or applied to other related scientific efforts.”  Garfield adds on: According to William Goffman in Cleveland’s Case Western Reserve University and Kenneth S. Warren of the Rockefeller Foundation in New York, “…A strong presumption prevails that any evidence that contradicts the accepted view is invalid and must be disregarded…” It seems, Barber had well defined in 1961 itself about the topic of resistance by scientists to new discoveries (especially those that challenge commonly held percepts). Likewise, if one does not follow the well-ploughed path of presentation of his/her discoveries, the chances of those findings getting totally ignored appear to be great. The fact that a particular research is done in a deviated manner from the so-called ‘norm’, should, by right, be considered to show the extra capabilities and exceptional talent of the researcher. Again, Eugene Garfield’s (1989) another thought-provoking article entitled “The Process of Scientific Discovery” has brought to recognition my kind of approach.   If all of MY discoveries published in 1998 (and subsequent years) in the form of a books with proper ISBN reference and the like) is considered to constitute 100%, recent scientists from different parts of the world have been publishing these days bits and pieces of my findings (amounting to 5 or 6 percent of my works) as if theirs is the first-time report (may not form plagiarisms), simply because they have not seen my publications – for want of adequate citations and publicity, especially because I do not belong to the mainstream medical fraternity. Thus, my findings tend, erroneously, to form one of the multiple discoveries. I have been trying for the past 41 years, through multivariate means, to get my findings recognized. None of them brought me any success.  Could you, if you have any authority,  kindly evaluate my works, and do the needful to bring them to recognition soon, so that the suffering millions worldwide can be saved from nearly all of the diseases, thus making their life on earth more pleasant, contributive and meaningful.  ********** THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION, or any Health Ministry in any of the countries, must come forward to recognise my findings.    FOR THAT MATTER, EVEN OUR MALAYSIAN HEALTH MINISTER  Dato Sri Dr. S. Subramaniam, and/or his Deputy Dato Seri Dr.Hilmi Yahaya, who support any alternative medicine if it can help the people rid of their health problems, could invite me to implement my findings in one of our well-established and most modern hospitals in Kuala Lumpur / Selangor (Such as the Selayang Hospital),  I will do the needful, demonstrate excellent and highly disciplined scientific procedure and show positive results within a short time span of even TWO MONTHS, incurring insignificant expenditure. ******** Well friends, I look forward to some magical changes to occur this year. With best wishes, Dr. Palani, Ph.D.

 

CAUSES THAT MAKE A PERSON DIABETIC, AND A SIMPLE METHODTO PREVENT OR CURE IT

CAUSES THAT MAKE A PERSON DIABETIC, AND A SIMPLE METHOD TO PREVENT OR CURE IT.

(© 6 April 2016: Dr. V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D.)

Based on the rate of increase in the prevalence of type-2 diabetics, it appears, at least in theory, that EVERY HUMAN BEING born on earth is going to be a diabetic, before the end of next century, if not this!

Can this happen?

Well, logically speaking, if the current lifestyle and related health-care, irrespective of their nature and validity, are going to be continued without any change, there is every possibility that all humans are going to be diabetic.

All those concerned have been telling the people to change their lifestyle.

By that, they want the people to do (1) exercise, (2) eat sugar-free diet, and (3) reduce the obesity.  

Here, the following appear to be the ironies:

(1)  A significant number of those who get type-2 diabetes, especially most of the health-conscious executives occupying very high positions in society, appear to be doing exercises.

 

Yet, they fall victims.

 

(2)  The above-group of people, almost for certain, take very little or no sugar, avoid too much of carbohydrates, and consume a high-protein diet. (Needless to highlight, they avoid salt as well.)

 

Yet, they fall victims.

 

(3)   Another requirement is “Reduce Obesity”

 

Besides burning out the calories (through exercises) that had gone into their body through the food eaten, they also REDUCE the total quantity of food eaten.

 

Yet, their obesity status would not decrease.

 

Even near-starvation diet would not lessen their body weight.

 

The health-care industry, besides telling them to reduce their body weight through exercises and reduced food consumption, for want of correct advice, leaves the unsolvable problem to the person concerned.

 

As a result, the person ends up being a diabetic patient!

 

Let us be genuine in finding an answer:

 

1.    World-wide, all health-care authorities have been directing people to do all the above. Nearly everybody is aware of the details. Yet, the rate has been alarmingly increasing year after year. WHY?

 

2.    Likewise, if a common man gets diabetes, he can be blamed for not practising proper lifestyle.

 

If an Endocrinologist is getting diabetes, I think, we should not suspect him of being careless. It should simply mean that what is being preached as good lifestyle, in fact, may NOT be so. In which case, the CONCEPT of good lifestyle should be RE-PHRASED!

 

Here is a simile that is quoted by nearly all the motivators:

 

An insect that had entered into the house by mistake, tries to fly away through a closed glass window.

 

It bangs on the glass repeatedly, in spite of being unable to fly through. After numerous attempts, it falls dead.

 

If only that insect changed a bit in its attempt, it could have happily flown away through the adjacent window that was open all this while.

 

I think, it may not be improper for us to use this for comparing our behaviour when it comes to the onset of diabetes.

 

People are desperately trying to practise what is being preached. Yet, failure results.

 At this, why cannot we think differently?

 Exercises do not seem to help in avoiding the disease.

So, we can drop off this item from our list of recommendations.

Drastic reduction or avoidance of sugar and carbohydrates do not seem to help either.

So, we need not reduce the above from our diet.

Obesity does not seem to get corrected by practising what is being told.

So, we need not follow what is being suggested for its correction.

In essence,

For a change,

We need not do exercises.

We need not reduce sugars and carbohydrates, and

We need not try to reduce the obesity through the suggested means. (We can go for alternative means).

If so, what can be the ALTERNATIVE suggestions for a possible PREVENTION OF TYPE 2 DIABETES? 

I have traced the correct causative factors (aetiology) for this disease, and also the correct curative procedure for a total cure of the disease, through my 41 years of study. 

Let us think a bit differently, to find if this works:

If the bee cannot find an escape through the open window, at its worst, it is going to die the same way as before. 

Likewise, if this alternative method fails to keep a person NON-OBESE and NON-DIABETIC, at its worst, identical increases in the number of diabetics would continue to occur.

Thus, there will be nothing more to lose! 

So, NO ONE should prevent the adoption of my method, at least because I have been claiming that it would yield and definite and positive result. 

Total prevention and complete cure of type-2 diabetes would certainly adversely affect the pharmaceutical industry to an alarming extent. 

All this while, the world had a need to find employment for the people, and also had to keep a thriving economy.  

However, it appears that the time has come now to compromise. We seem to have arrived at a situation where we have to give relatively more importance to human health as against employment and economy. 

Hence, the manufacturing and marketing of drugs may have to take only a second place, giving priority to the prevention of diseases. Lest, the world can collapse, which would again lead to the collapse of the very economy we have been trying to upkeep. 

*******

PREVENTION and CURE for TYPE-2 DIABETES:

(Source: Palaniappan, V.M., 2011. Diabetes: Causes, Cure, and Prevention. Neo Health Care (Malaysia) Publication.256 pp. ISBN 978-967-9988-15-4)

Here is the method, very simple and easy to practise (and the explanations and supporting evidences may be found towards the end of this directive):

1.    EVERYBODY should urinate at least 8 times daily (in 24 hours).

To do the above,  

·       All grown-up people, above 18 years of age, should DRINK 2 – 3 Litres of plain and clean WATER daily (not fruit juices, other beverages or drinks). (Children should consume lesser quantities according to their age and body size).

·       Nearly all the water consumed must be voided as urine. That means, the input versus output ratio should work out to 1.0, 1.1, or 1.2 the most.

·       To achieve 1:1 ratio, ADULTS should NOT lose the body water in the form of sweat. So, sweat-producing exercises, games, or any other sports activities should be AVOIDED. 

2.    ALL ADULTS should consume NORMAL sugar.  

·       At least 60% of Carbohydrates (rice, potato, etc.) that should include NORMAL sugar + about 20% fats, and about 20% proteins. (Intake of supplements of vitamins and minerals should be avoided, unless there is a medical urgency.) (There should not be any objection to taking white sugar where needed / preferred.) 

3.    Care should be exercised to ascertain the faeces defecated remains SHAPLEY and SOLID in consistency, and NOT slimy or watery and shapeless.

·       To achieve this, people should NOT consume chocolates, biscuits, peanuts, cakes, and over-ripe fruits – papaya in particular. Consumption of wheat products should also be kept to the minimum.  

4.    Calcium-rich eatables should be avoided, or kept to the minimum.

·       Calcium mineral supplement should not be taken.

·       Calcium-enriched eatables should be avoided.

·       Over-consumption of Calcium-rich diet such as dairy products (milk, cheese, etc.), eggs, sea food (fish, crabs, prawn, etc.) should be avoided. 

PRACTISING THE ABOVE FOUR ALONE WOULD PREVENT THE ONSET OF TYPE-2 DIABETES. 

TO ACHIEVE A CURE, ONE SHOULD ALSO GET HIS/HER BODY DECALCIFIED BY CONSUMING FOODS AND WATER OF ACID REACTION (e.g., rain water, or distilled water). 

(Elaborate details of the procedure may be read in my book Diabetes: Causes, Cure and Prevention, listed above.)

**********

          NOW, THE THEORY (AND LOGIC) BEHIND THE ABOVE DIRECTIVE: 

(A) THE SUGAR ASPECT: 

1.    In a healthy person who consumes NORMAL quantities of SUGAR, NORMAL quantities of INSULIN would secrete.

2.    If he/she takes more sugar, more insulin secretes.

3.    If plenty of sugar is consumed, plenty of insulin would secrete.

4.    If abundant sugar that is beyond the tolerance capacity of the body is consumed, in order to save the body from death, by way of AUTO-IMMUNE mechanism, the brain ‘kills’ the beta cells in the pancreas, and thereby prevents the utility of the excessive sugar that repeatedly goes into the body, and this forms TYPE – 1 DIABETES.

5.    If the healthy person consuming normal sugar, REDUCES his/her sugar intake, the insulin secretion also gets reduced accordingly.

6.    If the person stops taking sugar altogether, then, the beta cells in the pancreas also drastically cuts down its insulin secretion.

7.    If the absenteeism in sugar consumption is continued, then, the REDUCED insulin secretion becomes a PATTERN for the beta cells, and this gives rise to TYPE-2 DIABETES. 

(B)  THE CALCIUM PHENOMENON: 

1.      Sugarcane plants raised in CALCIUM-RICH soil produces plenty of sugar. Those grown in acid soil (that is devoid of calcium) becomes bland, and has extremely little sugar content in its sap.

2.      Trees that produced sour mangos begin to produce sweet mangos if and when dressed with calcium as fertilizer.

3.      Adults require about 450 or 500 mg of calcium as a daily requirement. However, a lot more than that enters into the body through enriched foods and supplementations.

4.      Excessive unusable calcium has to be thrown out of the body, lest those excesses accumulate (a) within soft cells to form breast lumps, prostate enlargements, tumours, etc., (b) within the lymph ducts and bone marrow giving rise to various forms of leukaemia, and (c) within the intercellular spaces in the brain, giving rise to tumours there.

5.      Elimination of the calcium excesses can occur only through liberal urination. Voiding very little urine would remove only a little of the excesses. I have found that people need to urinate about 8-9 times daily for a complete elimination of all the calcium excesses.

6.      Calcium excesses left within the body of the under-urinating (e.g., about thrice daily) people appear to be behaving similar to the sugars, and that tends to raise the serum sugar content levels when tested. However, since calcium itself is NOT a sugar, it does NOT induce the secretion of insulin in the pancreas. This sequence establishes the onset of type-2 diabetes. The chemical reactions of this phenomenon remain obscure.

7.      Regular removal (decalcification) of the calcium excesses through liberal urinations, along with the avoidance of calcium-rich eatables, appears to give a cure of the disease.

8.      Solid and shapely faeces carries in it all the unutilised, unabsorbed (undigested) calcium contained in the vegetable matter consumed. If and when a person defecates slimy faeces, the calcium gets absorbed by the lining glandular cells at the colon, and the person’s total calcium accumulation tends to get increased, thus favouring an increase in the serum sugar level, besides giving room for the development of colo-rectal cancer (AS WELL AS OBESITY) in the long run.

**********

RIGHT NOW, WHAT MAKES PEOPLE PRONE TO DEVELOP TYPE-2 DIABETES? 

The answer is: 

1.    They consume much LESS sugar than the normal requirement, resulting in reduced insulin production.

2.    All potential sufferers UNDER-URINATE (about thrice daily). That could be due to (a) habitual suppression of the urge for urination, (b) losing most of their body water to profuse sweating, (c) losing it to fanning and/or air-conditioning, or (d) drinking LITTLE water.

3.    They defecate SLIMY and SHAPELESS faeces. Certain consumables such as chocolates, cakes, biscuits, peanuts, over-ripe fruits – papaya in particular (+ all fruit juices) tend to make the faeces slimy, and thereby enhance the absorption of the locked-up calcium.

The above makes a person diabetic. 

***********

TO SUM UP, ALL THAT IS REQUIRED OF A NORMAL PERSON TO REMAIN HEALTHY ALL THE TIME IS TO DRINK ABOUT 2 L OF CLEAN WATER DAILY, URINATE NEARLY ALL OF IT THROUGH ABOUT 8 OR 9 URINATIONS, AND AVOID ACCUMULATING TOO MUCH OF CALCIUM THROUGH ANY POSSIBLE SOURCE.

*********

The above method is extremely easy to practise.

All that is required of all Government Agencies responsible for health is to disseminate this information through all available MASS MEDIA so that people would understand, follow, and remain healthy. 

The WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION (WHO) WILL HAVE TO DO THIS SO AS TO MAKE THE WORLD POPULATION REMAIN HEALTHY.

*************

Dear Friends, 

I hope the above article is useful to you.

I went to India for 57 days, and returned only on 31 March. That is the reason why I did not contribute anything to you through our BLOG.

With best wishes,

Dr. Palani, Ph.D.