OBESITY, TYPE-2 DIABETES, AND HEART ATTACKS CAN NEVER BE PREVENTED THROUGH BALANCED DIET AND EXERCISES

(© 27 February 2013: Dr.V.M.Palaniappan, Ph.D.)

I read again a story in The Star  (Malaysian, Wed., 27 Feb. 2013:page 6, col.4) that reported a news related to the prevention of obesity among Malaysian infants and adults.

I could see how interested our Health Minister, Hon’ble Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai is in our welfare.  

I thank him on behalf of all Malaysians.

According to a plan that is going to be launched soon,

(1)  Mothers of infants will be educated on proper feeding of their babies with a balanced diet, for the first 1000 days.

(2)  Parents of overweight school children will be educated on methods of treating their condition.

(3)  Cafeterias in government departments will be advised to prepare ‘healthy’ food so that people would avoid eating oily and fatty food.

According to the Minister, Malaysia was said to be the most over-weight country in S.E.Asia.

*********

On reading the above news this morning, I felt much restless.

In the first place, I don’t doubt our Minister’s goodwill. 

He sure wants all Malaysians to live healthily.

However, very unfortunately, as per my research study, even AFTER implementing all the above projects, Malaysia is still going to be, for sure, S.E.Asias’s most over-weight country, if not at world-level.

Why is it so?

Let me explain here.

**************

In the first place, eating MORE food of any kind can make a child or person put on weight.

Of course, eating more of OILY and FATTY food can increase the rate a little more.

Yet, they may not turn into MORBID (i.e., disease-causing) obesity.

If so, what makes a child or an adult TRULY obese? Or, develop MORBID obesity?

My study shows the following, which I have presented with adequate statistical information in my book “Obesity: Causes, Cure, and Prevention” (1998; ISBN967-9988--05-8), in “The True Causes of All Diseases” (2008; ISBN978-967-9988-13-0), and in several of my books, including Diabetes: Causes, Cure, and Prevention (2012; ISBN 978-967-9988-15-4).

• PEOPLE MUST URINATE AT LEAST 8 TIMES DAILY, IN 24 HOURS’ DAY.
• 
  
• ALL THOSE WHO UNDER-URINATE AFTER DRINKING PLENTY OF WATER (e.g., 2 L or MORE) WILL CERTAINLY BECOME OBESE - MUCH BIGGER SIZED THAN THEIR PARENTS, AND WILL ALSO DEFINITELY DEVELOP TYPE-2 DIABETES!
• 
  
• ALL THOSE WHO UNDER-URINATE (e.g., urinate about three or four times daily) WITHOUT DRINKING ADEQUATE WATER, WILL DEFINITELY BECOME HUGE-BODIED PERSONS, AND WILL GET HEART ATTACK + TYPE-2 DIABETES!
• 
  
• THE ABOVE GET SPEEDED UP IF THE PERSON HAPPENS TO EAT EXCESSIVE FOOD OF A MIXED KIND.
• 
  
• THE ABOVE GET SPEEDED UP AT A RAPID RATE, IF THE PERSON CONSUMES TOO MUCH OF OILY AND FATTY FOOD! (HIS BODY WILL BECOME ‘GIANT-SIZED’!)
• 
  
• IF A PERSON DRINKS ABOUT 2 L OF WATER DAILY, URINATES ABOUT 8 OR 9 TIMES DAILY, EATS PLENTY OF THE MIXED KIND OF FOOD, WILL DEVELOP A POT BELLY, BUT WILL NOT GET DIABETES, HEART ATTACK, OR ANY OTHER MAJOR DISEASE.
• 
  
• IF A PERSON DRINKS AND URINATES WELL AS ABOVE, BUT EATS MUCH OF OILY AND FATTY FOOD, HIS OVERALL BODY WEIGHT AND SIZE WILL INCREASE, BUT WILL BE WITHOUT DIABETES, HEART ATTACK AND/OR RELATED DISEASES.  
• 
  
• TOO MUCH OF SWEAT-OUT EXERCISES CAUSE LOSS OF BODY WATER, AND THEREBY LEAD TO UNDER-URINATION, THUS PAVING A WAY FOR TYPE-2 DIABETES AND MORBID OBESITY.

I have given clear and vivid explanations to prove all the above, with adequate statistics in all the above books.

(Dear Readers / Visitors to THIS Blog,

All the above make up the TOTAL TRUTH!

It appears that I am a little TOO EARLY to report these facts, even before the world is ready to accept this kind of drastic changes in their age-old belief-system. 

The world is NOT ready for such drastic revolutionary thinking yet - for there are too many people with vested interest - their life will be at stake if they accepted my 'pre-mature' reporting of the facts.

You are going to observe all the above (my own) discoveries are published in bits and pieces by other scientists from different USA and European countries in the near future, each person / team claiming that they have discovered that particular finding for the 'FIRST TIME', when in fact, I have already reported them right NOW, today, repeating my findings with effect from 1998!

At least, YOU, as a READER of my BLOG, one of the 45 thousand visitors, or 36 thousand page viewers  will know that these findings that have 'already' been reported by Dr.V.M. Palaniappan, a lot earlier than those so-called 'latest' discoverers. 

Even if I am dead and gone, I hope, you will fight for me - claiming that it WAS Dr. Palaniappan who first found all the facts and truth, and reported them, as early as in 1998, and again in 2013.)

Once before, I have even begged the Authorities to give me a chance to prove all the above - yet, I have NOT asked for a grant of any kind to do that!

All it requires is, willingness on the part of the Authorities concerned about human health - in any country for that matter, and also the Health Ministries / Health Ministers, to invite me to prove my point.

I can prove it within a short time span.

What else do you want?

It appears Asians in general seem to give importance to research news only if it comes from USA or Europe - even if it happens to be somewhat ill-researched*.

(* e.g. of ill-researched information: "daily beer drinking is good for health": Refer to one of my earlier articles in this blog, wherein I have highlighted the errors in the experimental design that brought out such a conclusion.)

What a pity!

I hereby request Authorities worldwide, please invite me / give me an opportunity to prove all the above findings, so that humans all over can lead a healthy - a very healthy life, thus reducing the burden of depleting enormous funds for health management of people.

Often, Senior Authorities in top positions, including Ministers, will be extremely busy in their day-to-day work schedules. 

No one can blame them for not reading my books.

However, people in such important positions, I believe, would have PRESS SECRETARIES.

Such people should definitely consider publications that come from people of the Tropics as well, and report to their bosses - bring these to their attention, so that appropriate action can be taken.

For this to happen, such Secretaries should be liberal enough to believe that Asians can also be intelligent on par with Westerners.

Well, I now hope, among those who regularly visit THIS Blog, there are people capable of voicing this out to Health Ministers in different countries, including Malaysia.

If the rate of Type-2 Diabetes, incidence of heart diseases and morbid obesity decrease in Malaysia because of my findings, we can be proud of our Nation, and shout out to the world at large, saying that this success had happened because of a Malaysian!

Then, our country can continue to proudly boast to the world that “Malaysia Boleh” (i.e., Malaysia Can Do!).

God, please let this happen, soon!

OK, friends, with love and affection,

Dr. Palani.

DO WOMEN REQUIRE WEARING PANTIES?

DO WOMEN REQUIRE WEARING PANTIES?

(© 2012: Dr. V.M.Palaniappan)

Dear Friends,

You may wonder why have I ignored the information related to the use of panties by women, in my previous posting.

It is just that I wanted you to  ponder yourself a bit.

I guess, you must have done so.

If men are wearing briefs to avoid varicose veins, and also to suppress / hide their  penile erection in public, what could be the purpose of women in wearing panties?

As per my findings, women of the tropics should not wear panties.

Do you know why?

That has scientific reasoning!

Most of the bacteria seem to prefer the following conditions to invade, live, multiply, and create a problem to the host: 

The pubic area of women becomes a most suitable niche for several microorganisms.

*************

1. Moisture 

2. Warmth

3. Nitrogen / Ammonia / Protein

4. Darkness

5. Absence of oxygen.

These are called "variables".

When a girl / woman wears panties, plenty of sweat is produced, and that provides adequate moisture for the bacteria.

Warmth: Panties conserve warmth in the pubic area.

The sweat containing urea in it, supplies plenty of nitrogen.

The panties keeps the pubic area in total darkness, even at mid-noon when sun shines well.

Panties, by preventing free air-exchange, will keep the pubic region devoid of oxygen.

What more?

With all the above ecological factors staying in a very conducive state, a large number of microbes (bacteria, fungi,  and several other tiny organisms) prefer to 'colonise' the pubic area.

This would then give rise to some diseases, including itch and foul odour.

White discharges (that occur due to excessive calcium accumulation) tend to turn yellow due to bacterial infection, and start emitting unbearable foul odour (along with the itch).

If panties are not worn in the hot climates, all the above will not occur, for most of the favourable factors would turn into unfavourable ones, thus preventing microbial growth and their existence.

Thus, a woman without panties would end up being a lot healthier than the one with it. 

Following the above logic, if a woman in the tropics stops wearing panties, she may develop a feeling of nakedness initially. She would get used to it in a week's time.

(If a blowing wind lifts off your outer clothes, please don't blame me for that, for I don't create the wind!)

***************

 In cold countries, as I have explained in my book Sex Problems, it should be worn to protect the tender muscles of the pubic area from freezing.  

In the tropics, free air should be allowed to circulate around there so as to prevent sweat accumulation, microbial breeding, bad odour, itch, etc.

If one evaluates the evolution of the clothing pattern in the tropics, the above would become evident:

Since time immemorial, women of all the tropical countries, irrespective of their ethnic background, culture and all other variations, have been wearing only hanging-kind of ‘open' skirts that would allow free air-flow.

This pattern became changed only since the introduction of Western culture into tropical societies - especially only after 1950's.

Initially, younger girls in the tropical countries wore it.

As they grew up, they have continued the habit, and it has now become an accepted practice.

As a result, all those men who (out of irresistible curiosity) peep at the women going up in an escalator, end up seeing only their panties, eh! (Pardon my ‘cheap’  humour).

Let me point out one thing:  Still, women who are in their late seventies (today) and above do not wear panties; instead, they wear only skirts that are often made of cotton material, and not of ‘nylex’. This has been keeping them healthy.

In the West, the women (as well as men) normally remove their underclothing while going to bed.

Growing up children are trained to do so thus by their mothers.

Unfortunately in the tropics, most of the mothers do not tell their children to remove such underclothing (including the wearing of bra) while at sleep.

So, nearly all girls and most women (and some men) sleep with their underwear in tact all throughout night.

This certainly impede blood and lymph flows, especially since the muscular activities cease to function while at sleep.

These people should begin to get used to the idea of sleeping without underclothes.

 A full-length cotton nightdress should be considered appropriate for girls.

(Senior men in many of the tropical countries,even today, wear Kaili, Lunggi, Sarong, Veshti, and such clothes that are worn around the waist. These prove to be very healthy!

Young men here tend to sleep with their shorts on. A few even sleep with their full pants!)

Initially, sleeping without any undergarment may make them feel uneasy, making one feel as if he or she is sleeping naked.

But after a week, it would be very comfortable that he/she wouldn't want to sleep again with their underclothes.

It is a matter of just getting used to a new habit.

The benefits are very many, indeed! 

**************

In the meantime, I am reminded of an interesting anecdote - it is a true story linked to panties!

I was doing my SECOND Master of Science degree (by research) in 1966.

(I already had an M.Sc. degree by Examination in 1960, and a B.Sc. degree in 1958)

My fellow post-graduates (colleagues, then) jointly decided / organised to go for a “Panty Raid” in the Women Students’ Hostel, located within the campus, on one of those week-end nights.

The programme required jumping over the fence and gathering panties that were left in the clothesline for drying.

Every graduate male student from our Faculty was expected to participate in the said Raid. 

So, I too was in the team.

The very thought was exciting, and I was looking forward for that ‘treasure hunt’ on that particular weekend that was scheduled for the ‘action’.

When the night came, I became a ‘chicken’ - had no guts to go on, and therefore became an absentee.

The next morning (Sunday) all of us assembled in our Faculty to exchange information. 

They talked about the many fascinating adventures that had happened the previous night. 

Some even showed their ‘collections’, except that they were unable to find which one belonged to which of the women students.

If only the panties were auctioned....?!  

No, it did not happen.

It was all thrilling, until the University took severe measures to trace the ‘culprits’ and punish them. (The authorities / officials were all married people!)

I released a big sigh of relief! Thank God, I did not go on the ‘mission’.

Anyway, the ‘panty-raiding culture’ that was going on since few years in the past ceased from then on. 

I think, it became non-existent since 1967, or so!

Coming to think of it now, panties could form a Secondary Sex Character, somewhat analogous to wearing perfumes.

Well, friends, I hope you would take the above anecdote in a light mood, and will not get offended … Thanks for that!  

OK, Bye until next,

Dr. Palani, Ph.D.