REDUCED SUGAR CONSUMPTION WILL CERTAINLY INCREASE THE NUMBER OF TYPE-2 DIABETIC CASES

REDUCED SUGAR CONSUMPTION WILL CERTAINLY INCREASE THE NUMBER OF TYPE-2 DIABETIC CASES

(© 12 November, 2013: Dr.V.M.Palaniappan, Ph.D.)

I am more interested than anyone else to see people live a disease-free life, especially without diabetes, cancers and heart diseases.

This being the case, why should I (a service-oriented, people-loving, humble and low-stratum scientist,) cry aloud telling people not to reduce sugar consumption, as opposed to the entire world?

It is so because, I am absolutely certain of the facts I have been talking about.

My claim is based on 38 years of research, clinical observations, and small-scale trials.

(Meta-analysis is not possible, especially because the entire world is going in a mislead path, and it appears I am a 'lone ranger' in this respect.)

I am firm and clear while saying that DECREASED sugar consumption WILL INCREASE Type-2 Diabetism in people.

By right, following the scientific tradition of reporting new findings, the write-up 'demands' a different style of expression.

I should have worded the very title in the following manner:

“Reduced sugar consumption MAY increase the number of type-2 diabetic cases”.

OR, to be more polite and humble, I should put it in the following manner:

“There appears to exist some amount of evidence to suspect that decreased sugar consumption could be one of the major risk factors that may initiate type-2 diabetes in people, worldwide.”  

In spite of knowing how to write, if I am putting it up bluntly in a somewhat harsh manner, that must have some reason:

1.  I am pretty sure of my findings that the sugar consumption is NOT INITIATING the type-2 diabetes.

    (Far too much of sugar - to an 'unimaginable' amount, will of course give rise to Type-1 Diabetes - the Insulin-dependent type - the injecting type).

2.  It is ACCUMULATION OF EXCESSIVE CALCIUM that INITIATES the Type-2 Diabetes in people.

3.  Whereas, it is only that AFTER someone becoming diabetic, the SUGAR INTAKE remains floating in the blood (and also gets eliminated through urine. This would mean that excessive urination forced by the brain is body-friendly, body-protective, rather than destructive.  In other words, if a person in whom excessive calcium has already accumulated does not develop  type-2 diabetes, he would develop heart attack, and may die of that, or at least, get a stroke.).

This happens because, the REDUCED SUGAR CONSUMPTION HAS ALREADY REDUCED (proportionately) THE NATURAL INSULIN PRODUCTION BY THE BETA CELLS IN THE PANCREAS of that person.

So, for want of adequate natural insulin, any freshly consumed sugar will NOT get digested, hence it keeps floating in the blood.

Naturally, the undigested sugar (that would turn excessive by now) will damage the eyes, rot the soft tissues (thus leading towards amputation), bring about erectile dysfunction, and the like.

*   *   *   *   *   * 

How does it happen?

How does calcium influence the onset of type-2 diabetes?

Let me explain the correct path that gives rise to this menace, that has been turning epidemic world-wide:

*******

Sugar cane synthesizes sugar.

To enhance sugar production, the farmer does NOT add sugar as fertilizer to the sugarcane plant.

The same goes with any other plant product (e.g., a mango fruit) that tastes sweet to the tongue. 

The much-talked about Stevia rebaudiana. (the sugary herb) too gets its sweetness from some other source, and certainly not from sugar produced by sugarcane.

If so, what could be that substance that is used by all plants, including sugarcane, to synthesize sugar?

Well, it is just CALCIUM !

In the practice of agriculture / agronomy, they apply what is called “Agriculture Lime”.

The process is called “Liming the Soil”.

When calcium gets depleted (either because of excessive rainfall and related leaching losses, or because of the addition of acid-forming fertilizers), the soil becomes INFERTILE: i.e., acidic.

Sugar cane plants, even Stevia sp., or a mango tree, growing on such acid soil, would produce fruits that are bland, and NOT sugary, and they tend to be SOUR because of the acidity.

You can do a simple experiment to understand this phenomenon at home:

Buy two sour unripe mangos from the market place.

Scratch the stalk of one mango, and apply lime (calcium = kapur in Malay language, and chunnmbu, in Tamil). Wrap it up in a newspaper and leave it for four or five days.

Do likewise with the other mango, except that you should not apply the lime to the stalk.

After ripening, you would find the lime-applied mango alone sweeter, and not the untreated one.

There is another practice worthy of mention here:

Do you know how some commerce-oriented people ripen fruits, such as mangos, banana, and the like?

They store these unripe, prematurely harvested fruits in an air-tight room. Then they use CALCIUM Carbide.  That ripens them. Yet, since the calcium has not penetrated into the meat of the fruit, it does not taste sweet!

In other words, the ripening AND sweetening of the fruits are carried out only by CALCIUM.

If the mango is still attached to the tree, then, the ‘mother tree’ would ‘pump in’ calcium to the fully mature mango, and THAT ripens and sweetens the mango.

(The ‘pumping-in’ action is called ‘Mineral Ion Transport”.  If you want to learn more about it, please buy a book by the book by Epstein, E. 1972. Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 412 pp.  This is such a wonderful book, and the English language used is very much enjoyable!)

********
Calcium that has accumulated within the body of a person to excessive quantities, that reaches a level that is beyond the tolerance limit of the human body, then, the pancreas, being unable to utilize the whole lot of it, and by way of what we understand as an “Auto-Immune Disease”, the brain auto-regulates the functioning of the beta cells in the pancreas to produce LESS insulin, so that, only proportionately LESSER calcium will be utilized, thus saving the body from undesirable illnesses that are associated with diabetes (and morbid obesity).

As said earlier, if the person consumes sugar, the insulin production too becomes minimized.

Now, do you know what can happen to the left-over, unutilized calcium?

Such left-over excesses tend to get transported by the LYMPH fluid (and probably much less by the blood, due to the controlling potentials of calcitonin) to other parts of the body, get absorbed by the cells of the soft tissues (to become part of the cytoplasm), thus giving rise to enlargements (hypertrophy, as it occurs in the prostate gland), or lumps (as in breasts), brain tumours*, and the like.  

(* I have, at various occasions, explained that the excessive calcium gets carried by the lymph fluid to the brain, if the person happens to sleep without a pillow, or resting his head at a lower level than his body - this way, the earth's gravitational pull drains the calcium excesses to the brain.)

********

The above explanation should clarify the sequence that leads to the development of type-2 diabetes.

So, it is important to PREVENT THE ACCUMULATION OF CALCIUM EXCESSES WITHIN THE BODY OF A PERSON*, RATHER THAN RESTRICTING HIS SUGAR CONSUMPTION.

(* I have defined very well, and have described in elaborate terms, as how the calcium accumulates to excessive quantitates within the body, in all my books, and also in most of my articles.

Under-urination + defecating SLIMY FAECES are the TWO main causes for such excessive calcium accumulations.

My new book that is expected to come out from the printers soon will substantiate these very well).

A mere reduction in the sugar consumption would only, proportionately and correspondingly REDUCE the insulin production, and that itself would diminish further the insulin production, resulting in the worsening of the disease.

********

Of late, the entire lot of health consultants all over the world have been trying to ‘educate’ people not to consume sugar.

Day by day, the campaign is getting aggressive.

All mass media, whether that be the TVs, Radios, or Newspapers, all of them, along with the Health Authorities and Consumer Associations, have been advocating people to cut down on sugar, and to stop taking it if possible.

Since the campaign has been getting intense this year, I firmly believe that the number of diabetic people is going to INCREASE MANIFOLD NEXT YEAR !

The truth is, all politicians and health ministries world-wide, especially in Malaysia – as I am aware of it, are very sincerely desirous of saving people from many of the serious illnesses: They want to see their citizens healthy. I don’t doubt it all!

Malaysia has been spending enormous amount of money, effort and time in trying to protect the people from diabetes and also from other major diseases. They are constantly looking for solutions - I don't doubt that at all!

However, please see the following analogy:

I am holding an expensive glass, filled with purified drinking water.

If I throw it away with anger, it will break, and that will become useless.

On the other hand, I love it – I like the glass. Yet, unwittingly, it slips off from my hand, similar to an accident. In this case also, the glass will break, and will become useless.

This is precisely what has been happening now.

All those concerned with people’s health, worldwide, for certain want to help people live well.

Unwittingly, they are making the grave mistake of guiding people to REDUCE sugar, and they are also telling them to take MORE calcium.

Sad to say: both are wrong!

Very soon, in the years to come – may be within next five years, when nearly 80% of the people are going to get diabetes, they will realize that what ‘was’ said by Dr.V.M.Palaniappan, since 1998, through all his publications, including the postings in this Blog, ‘were’ ‘totally’ true, or at least, true to a major extent!

Well friends, if you can influence the senior authorities in the health-care industries, of if you happen to be the MINISTER of HEALTH, please put all my reports to experimentation for re-confirmation, and  implement them for the betterment of mankind (and of course, give me due recognition, while I am still alive – Eh!)

OK, friends,

With best wishes,

Dr. Palani, Ph.D.,

SUGAR CONSUMPTION WILL NOT GIVE TYPE-2 DIABETES, AS FEARED BY MOST PEOPLE

SUGAR CONSUMPTION WILL NOT GIVE TYPE-2 DIABETES, AS FEARED BY MOST PEOPLE

(©2 November 2013: Dr. V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D.)

I am, most probably, the only person (in the entire world) who have guts to say that sugar consumption will NOT GIVE rise to Type-2 Diabetes.

I have enough evidence to prove my point.

Based on my findings, I have been taking plenty of sugary drinks, deserts and snacks. 

In fact, today being the Deepavali Day (Festival of Lights, celebrated by Hindus worldwide), I have been fearlessly enjoying all kinds of sweets in my friends’ houses.

Let me prove my point. Upon knowing the truth, you too may start eating sweets comfortably.

Let me ask you the following questions, and you please try to answer that first:

White sugar comes from sugarcane.

Some sugarcanes (the stem) taste sweet, while others taste bland.

Why is it so?

Does the Farmer add white sugar (as fertilizer) to the soil around the root of the plant to make it sweet?

Can that be true that if he adds more sugar, the sugarcane tastes sweeter, and without sugar addition, it tastes bland?

If that is not true, then, what else makes the sugarcane taste sugary?

*********

Let us do an experiment here:

You select two acres of land that is NOT fertile.

(If you cannot have a land, you can use two clay POTS with soil, instead.)

Mark one acre as “Control”, and another as “Experimental”.

Then, treat BOTH lands alike, when it comes to plowing, irrigating, exposure to sunshine, and the like.

Plant both lands with sugarcane cuttings, to raise the crop.

To the “Experimental plot”, ADD AGRICULTURAL LIME (i.e., CALCIUM hydroxide powder) to the soil.

(In Tamil, we call lime “Chunnambu”. In Malay, we call it kapur: this is what people rub over betel leaves before chewing it with betel nuts).

In the practice of Agriculture / Agronomy, they call this process “liming the soil”.  It is used to turn acid soil into fertile / alkaline soil, for increased yield.

Do NOT add the lime to the Control plot.

When the crop matures, you will find the whole lot of sugarcane plants (the stems) in the Experimental plot taste very sweet.

Those in the Control plot would taste bland!

This experiment would convince you that the sugar cane plant produces sugar NOT from sugar itself, but it is from the CALCIUM.

*******

(If you want to sweeten sour mangos, just scrape the stalk a little, rub it with lime, wrap in newspaper, and leave it for a few days, they will turn sweeter.

If mangos are prematurely harvested from the tree, since the tree will not be able to supply calcium any more, the fruits will not taste sweet.

If an when mangos are left in the tree until ripening time, the fresh calcium input will make the fruits taste sweeter.

This is applicable to All fruits.)

*********

Please continue reading:

It is common knowledge that Pancreas, from the Beta Cells present in it, that produces INSULIN.

Insulin is the substance that helps in the utilization of sugars and carbohydrates.

Carbohydrates and sugars contribute immediate and direct ENERGY for work (including our heart beat, blood circulation, breathing, brain function, body movements, etc., etc.)

So, God, Nature, or the Evolutionary Process, has given us Insulin.
In other words, we are created to consume carbohydrates and sugars.

We are NOT created to digest the cellulose cell walls that are present in plants. Cows and goats can digest the cellulose, using the digestive enzyme called Cellulase.

Nature / God / Evolutionary Process has NOT provided US Cellulose-Digesting Enzyme.

Therefore, when we eat vegetable matter, the cellulose cell walls do NOT get digested in our intestine – they are thrown out of our body as FAECES.

The cows and goats digest them!

Likewise, if God / Nature / Evolutionary Process ‘wished’ that we should not digest sugar (and carbohydrates), HE/it could have avoided the production of Insulin altogether.

Since God/Nature/Evolutionary Process ‘felt’ a definite need for these products for our perfect living, our body has been provided with the ‘facility’ of insulin production.

In other words, we SHOULD eat sugars* and carbohydrates. If we don’t, it can mean that we are defying God, or going against Nature.

(Once, my colleague, who was my former student, in University of Malaya, assuming that he is ultra-intelligent, told me these words:

"The man who invented the use of sugar must have been the most ... fellow!"

I did not argue, but laughed inside me, contemplating on the arrogance of this guy.

No one 'invented' the use of sugar.
It is there in Nature.
Sugarcane is not MAN-created.
Sugarcane is an edible product.
Similar to any other food product, sugarcane too is eatable.
We cannot avoid eating sweet potatoes, for instance.

Sugar is part of our diet, and there can be nothing wrong about it!)

That being the case, how can sugars and carbohydrates give rise to Type-2 Diabetes?

Well, you can argue saying that eating TOO MUCH of sugars and carbohydrates is bad.

I do NOT deny that!

If you are going to eat FAR TOO MUCH of sugar – more than what your body can tolerate, of course, it will damage the body physiology in several ways.

The truth is, WHATEVER you do in EXCESS, that will certainly damage the body.

No one would argue on that.

If you are going to drink 10 L of water daily, even that is going to damage our body.

Of course, ANYTHING IN EXCESS WILL BE DANGEROUS.

When you eat sugary items, brain gives you pleasure – it makes you enjoy it.

When you continue taking TOO MUCH of such enjoyable sugars, your brain, upon recognizing that it is going to damage your body, gives you a SENSE OF SATISFACTION initially.

If you continue eating, your brain will give you a sense of DISGUST for the same food that gave you pleasure a while ago.

If you ignore the sense of disgust, and force yourself to ‘push in’ more sugary food, either because you are made to do so at gunpoint, or by persuasion in the form money or other forms of ‘bribery’,  then, THAT EXCESS is certainly going to damage your body physiology.

At this point, the brain, in the process of trying to save you, induces VOMIT, by giving you a sense of nausea.

If you ignore that too by taking, say sour or salty items for a change, and continue swallowing the sweets, that would, for certain, damage the body, and  it may even result in the death of the body.

At this, AS A LAST RESORT, having no further choice, the brain goes for another drastic alternative action that is possible within its capacity.

THE BRAIN KILLS THE BETA CELLS IN THE PANCREAS, and thus prevents the utilization of the sugar excesses.

When the beta cells are killed – in a suicidal manner,  insulin CANNOT be secreted any more. Thus, the body can be saved from the serious consequences that can happen if all the sugar excesses were allowed to be digested / utilized.

If sugar is not digested, such sugars will keep floating in the blood serum, and also in the lymph fluids.

When the person drinks water and urinates, THIS sugar excess will get out of the body, leaving the body UNDAMAGED.

*******

We call the above  “AUTO-IMMUNE DISEASE”.

Friends, except for me, the entire world has been saying that it does not know why this kind of auto-immune diseases occur in the human body.

In fact, whether that be the death of Thyroid gland (that results in hypothyroidism) or any other so-called Auto-Immune Disease that occurs in the body, they all have the SAME reasoning as I have explained here – for the first time in the history of mankind!

All the time, auto-immune diseases occur in body only to save the body from an earlier death – this way, the brain postpones death to a much later date!

In reality, the auto-immune diseases should be considered ‘human-friendly’.

********

If and when the beta cells in the Pancreas are killed by the brain this way, insulin secretion STOPS altogether.

Such a condition is called ‘INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS TYPE = I.

In fact, just about three decades ago, this Type-I disease was called “JUVENILE DIABETES”, meaning thereby that only children developed this disease.

Do you know why?

Because, children are the ones who normally keep on eating sweets, even without recognizing the feeling of ‘disgust’ for sweet. Then they end up with this Type-I diabetes.

*********

Now, let me ask you a few more questions:

If we eat sugary food or carbohydrates such as rice and potato, insulin secretes to digest them.

If we eat a LITTLE MORE of those items, little MORE insulin will secrete to digest all of them.

Some more sugary food would result in some more insulin production.

Likewise,

If we decrease the sugar intake, the insulin production also will proportionately decrease.

Further decrease of sugar intake will further decrease the insulin.

Based on the misconception that eating sugar will give rise to type-2 diabetes, the dietitians and health care consultants advocate people to reduce drastically the sugar consumption.

When people oblige and nearly stop taking sugar, the pancreas also (almost) stops secreting insulin.

When people continue to live with extremely little sugar and much less carbohydrates for 40 or 50 days, the brain picks that up as a habit.

In other words, the brain gets ‘addicted’ to the reduced insulin secretion. That becomes the new NORM for the body.

(If a person smokes for 48 days or so, he will become addicted to it. In Ayurvedic medicine, they have a term called “Mandalam” to indicate a period of 48 days).

The above being the new norm for the body, if the person suddenly takes a teaspoon of sugar, THIS sugar will keep floating in the blood WITHOUT getting digested and utilized – for want of adequate insulin.

At this point in time, if you take the blood sample and test the amount of sugar present in the serum, for sure, it would indicate the presence of PLENTY OF SUGAR IN IT. People would label that as Type-2 Diabetes!

**********

When a person’s pancreas has become ‘addicted’ to producing very little insulin, if you do not take sugar, the blood will naturally not show more sugar in it.

In today’s world, a major portion of the population - significant number of people have already reduced sugar consumption.  Yet, type-2 diabetes cases have been exponentially increasing annually.

Why is it so?

Let me explain the phenomenon:

**********

All food items eaten by man contain calcium, but to varying quantities. Some have more, and some have less.

Humans unwittingly end up eating MORE calcium than is needed by the body, for its well-being.

All such calcium excesses get removed from the body through urinations.

The problem would crop up only if and when a person refrains from urinating.

I have found, and have explained in all my books the importance of drinking about 2 L of pure water, and also urinating nearly all of it, daily.

If a person urinates about 2 L, then, ALL the calcium EXCESSES appear to get removed from the body.

However, nearly all the over-weight people, as per my study, do NOT urinate that quantity.

Most of them void only about half a litter, through about three or four urinations daily.

As a result of this UNDER-URINATION, plenty of calcium that is supposed to get out of the body stays inside it, accumulating and reaching toxic levels – beyond the tolerance limit of the body.

IN ADDITION TO THE UNDER-URINATION, plenty of the undigested (unutilized from the ingested food) calcium that remains as part of the faecal matter also gets absorbed by the cells that are found in the lining of the colo-rectal area of the intestine.

(The above absorption occurs when the faeces turns slimy and acidic, by the action of certain faecal bacteria, because of ingesting excessive high fibre, over-ripe fruits, especially over-ripe papaya fruit, etc.)

ALL these calcium excesses that stay within the body behave as SUGARS.

The body utilizes the calcium to synthesize sugar, similar to the sugarcane plant, and that in the first place, is what GIVES RISE TO THE TYPE-2 DIABETES to the low-sugar consuming, under-urinating and slimy-faeces-defecating person.

Of course, if and when the person becomes an established type-2 diabetic patient, naturally, any little sugar consumed is going to be floating in the blood, or getting out in the urine, in an unutised form.

*********

If a person urinates liberally (about 2 L daily), and if he guards his defecation pattern so that the faeces does not become slimy, and if he keeps eating sugary food, along with carbohydrates, he/she, similar to me, will NOT get type-2 diabetes at all!

********

Well, friends,

I have given plenty of very useful and additional information in this regard in my book “Diabetes: Causes, Cure, and Prevention”, published just last year.

Please read it and restore your health, and also enjoy eating all kinds of foods God / Nature has permitted us to eat, making sure (a) that they are pesticide-free, (b) that your drink about 2 L of pure water daily, and (c) that you urinate about 2 L daily.

******

Well, dear friends,

All the above are written in good faith, with the purpose of enlightening all my readers on the need to think scientifically further.

As per Law, you must consult your Doctor and follow only his advice and prescriptions, and not mine.

If and when my theories and theses are accepted and approved by the World Health Organisation, and also by the Health Ministry in your Country, you can then practice my suggestions, and not until then.

In the meantime, I will continue eating sweets and carbohydrates daily, respecting the feelings of ‘satisfaction’ and ‘disgust’, and enjoy life as is allowed by God / Nature.

With best wishes for a Happy Deepavali,

Yours,

Dr. Palani, Ph.D.

WE CAN CREATE CANCER IN HEALTHY PEOPLE, AND THAT WILL IDENTIFY THE EXACT CAUSES FOR CANCER DEVELOPMENT IN HUMANS.

WE CAN CREATE CANCER IN HEALTHY PEOPLE, AND THAT WILL IDENTIFY THE EXACT CAUSES FOR CANCER DEVELOPMENT IN HUMANS.

(© November, 2013: Dr. V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D.)

I read a news recently in the Press (The Star: Star Metro: Events: p.14, Friday, 18 October, 2013) that said “Breast cancer afflicts men too”.

Even before we can understand the breast cancer problem faced by men, we should, in the first place, know how and why women get it.

Practically the entire medical fraternity is still puzzled not knowing the exact cause that lies behind the formation of breast lumps and cancers*.

(* If that is known, then, all those can be reversed to restore perfect health in the person)

As it is, it appears that the only way to handle it is to dissect the lump or the cancer out from breast, and burning or charring away the healthy adjacent tissues, with the following false belief.

Everybody keeps imagining that the cancer as such is a collective formation of some kind of SPECILAISED cells that are NOT created by God or Nature, but by some UNKNOWN, MYSTERIOUS source - the causative factor.

Does it not sound funny?

Numerous so-called ‘culprits’ are listed as ‘risk factors’ for the development of cancers.

Let me ask this question:

If a healthy person is subjected to all possible risk factors that are listed by researchers, will that woman (or man) develop breast lumps or cancers?   

I do not think this can be achieved, with any number of human volunteers.

It is so because, the so-called risk factors, for most part, in real terms, are NOT the true causative factors for the problem!

I often used to say the following when people ask me question as why the medical fraternity, in spite of spending huge amounts of money, energy, manpower, and the like, is still not able to detect the real cause for cancer.

Let us say that the true cause is written in a copper plate, and is buried in the SOUTH Pole.

The medical fraternity, and all related researchers, will NOT find it for next million years, if they keep on digging the earth in the NORTH pole!

On the other hand, it so happened that I dug just the surface in the South Polar region, and to my luck, perhaps blessed by God, I found the answer!

I am only ONE INDIVIDUAL, as opposed to a million worldwide! 

In this case, does the number matter?

The following is the finding, which I have already been repeatedly telling through all my articles and books.

I pray, some one in the World Health Organisation reads THIS, and reads my books and publications, so that all the sufferers world-wide can be saved from dying of cancers and related miseries.

*   *   *   *   *   *

The following simple experiment would reveal and confirm the truth that lies behind the development of breast and nearly all forms of cancers:

Gather a few human volunteers, willing to die to save humanity*.

Even a small number would do. There can be a total of about 80 people: 40 women and 40 men, all aged between, say, 30 and 50 or so.

Half of them can be in the Control Group, and the other half can be subjected to experimentation.

(* I have voluntarily done some experiment in 1910, developed a benign abdominal tumour in my body, raised it in to a 12.5 c.m. ‘ball’, maintained it as a benign structure, and then had it surgically removed at Selayang Government Hospital in Kuala Lumpur.

I have evidences for all the above – in the form of Hospital Records, and also have an authentic video recording of the surgical procedure.

In due course, at the right time, I will post / publish them.)

Let the all the Volunteers lead a guided ‘healthy’ lifestyle, split them into TWO groups at random, let one be a Control Group, and the other, Experimental.

Subject all members of the Experimental Group alone to the following:

Give them CALCIUM supplementations, in the form of tablets, say 10,000 mg daily*.

(A small addition of Magnesium would do a better job. Yet, never mind about this at this occasion.)

Let them take 2,500 mg of the calcium tablet with breakfast, same with lunch, at teatime, and with dinner again, making up the total of 10 thousand milligrams*.

**********

(*Mother’s milk contains just 20 mg of Calcium, per100 ml.

Cow’s milk has 120 mg.

All eatables contain some amount of calcium. They can range anything from about 5 mg, or so to about 1000 mg, or so.

Often sea food tends to contain plenty of it.

********

Men require about 450 - 500 mg daily; women, about 500 - 550 mg, and children about 900 – 1,000 mg daily.

The little extra for women is to compensate the calcium loss through menstrual fluids, at monthly intervals.

Anything more than the above forms the EXCESS.

Under normal circumstances, the urine, voided about 8 times daily, removes such excesses, and keeps the body in a healthy state.

When people consume MORE of the calcium-containing foods, such as vegetables, the brain controls calcium absorption at the intestinal level, and pushes the excesses out as part of the faecal matter, as ‘locked-up’ unutilsed calcium. 

That is why the faeces is alkaline most of the time.)

********

The Control group should  NOT be given the 10 thousand mg of Calcium.

Apart from the EXTRA Calcium, the Experimental Group should be given a total of only FOUR glasses (1 L) of LIQUIDS daily (e.g., 2 glasses of water + 2 glasses of apple juice and/or orange juices.)

whereas, the Control Group should be given EIGHT glasses (2 L) of ONLY water, and NOT juices of any kind.

The Experimental Group should be regulated to urinate about FOUR times daily, whereas the Control should be urinating EIGHT times daily*.

(* To be more scientific, the water/liquid intake and the urine output can be measured accurately to see the Input/Output Ratio.

It would be about 1.0 to 1.2 or so in the Control Group, whereas, the Ratio would be about 1.5 – 2.0, or so. in the Experimental)

Apart from the above two, viz., glucose and water consumptions, ALL OTHER treatments and variables, whether that be the kind of food eaten, or exposure to pollutants and toxic substances, sleeping hours, and the like SHOULD BE EXACTLY IDENTICAL TO BOTH GROUPS.

*********

Based on my earlier observations, I firmly believe that THE ABOVE experiment WOULD CERTAINLY GIVE RISE TO some form of CANCER to members of the Experimental Group.

Some 80% of the people may get it.

It is quite probable that only an insignificant number of people, which could be just 2 – 5% of the people in the CONTROL GROUP, would get any one of the cancers. 

*******

If such a result comes out of the experiment, it would then become clear that IT IS THE ACCUMULATION OF EXCESSIVE CALCIUM AND GLUCOSE (Carbohydrates for tissue growth – for the growth of the so-called cancer cells) that are the EXACT culprits for giving rise to cancers.

********
At this, one may want to ask another question:

Why is it that the Calcium excesses and Glucose excesses do not form only ONE KIND of cancer in ONE organ?

If the causes are identical, why so many different kinds of cancers?

The following could form the answer:

Calcium and glucose get STORED in SOFT tissues.

Such storing can occur in any organ that has soft tissues.

The breast tissues, by nature, already have Lacticiferous tissues that are designed to scavenge and suck free dissolved calcium and glucose from the LYMPH fluid and blood, in order to synthesize milk to feed the baby.

If THAT calcium and glucose are NOT utilized as it happens in the case of a woman who has not given birth to a baby, then, such excesses stay there in those soft tissues, harden, and turn into lumps initially, and upon increased additions of the two substances, turn cancerous*.

(Endometriosis has the same aetiology) 

Further calcium increases, for want of extra storage spaces, result in the development of cancers in other, nearby or remote organs within the body.

Thus, it should be understood that cancers do NOT spread at all*.

(*The truth is that there is NO such thing as “CANCER CELL”.

Therefore, destroying good tissues from spreading of cancer, with the use of either chemical poisons or radiations, does not appear to make any sense, and it tends to form only some kind of mockery.)
********
Do you know why some women get cancer in the left breast, and some others in the right?

I have the correct answer for it:

The lymph fluid carries the calcium (and possibly the glucose) excesses to the breast regions.

If a woman sleeps for most part of the night (all the time) on her left side, her left breast would receive all the free calcium.

This is so because, the lymph fluid simply flows downward, drawn by the earth’s gravitational pull.

The reverse also is true.

If the woman happens to sleep on her right side all the time, her right breast gets the lump and cancer.

In my clinical practice, I have encountered, countless number of times, this phenomenon to occur.

If you have any doubt, you can pose a question to find the answer from any of the women who has breast lump or cancer.

You will find it as an undeniable truth!

********

When it to comes to the development of cancer in the Prostate Gland in men, again, the prostate gland is designed to scavenge and suck all available water-dissolved, free calcium for the purpose of synthesizing semen.

If a man does NOT ejaculate the semen at regular intervals, and IF HE UNDER-URINATES (thus preventing the removal of the calcium excesses through urinations), and also consumes calcium-rich fruit juices and soups (that are calcium extracts of vegetables or bones, for example), calcium accumulations in the soft tissues that make up the prostate gland can reach to very high levels.

That can then give rise to enlargement of the gland (hypertrophy) initially, and then to cancer (hyperplasia).

********

Prostitutes appear to be getting cervical or vaginal cancer.

Do you know why this happens? 

The semen contains abundant absorbable calcium in it.

When semen is ejaculated into the vagina, the lining there absorbs the calcium rapidly.

Since prostitutes are bound to receive seminal fluids several time daily, and since that process goes on daily for a prolonged period, the excessive calcium absorbed gives rise to vaginal or cervical cancer to them.

********

If the calcium excesses happen to be present in the lymph fluid for prolonged periods, then the person would develop LYMPH cancer*.

(* If a person habitually keeps on eating heavy LATE-NIGHT (say, after 10.00 p.m.) dinners all the time, consisting of either calcium-rich seafood, dairy products or vegetables, due to cessation of the peristalsis action of the intestine, the food tends to STAGNATE at various locations along the intestine until the peristalsis is resumed in the following mornings.)

The calcium contents in such stagnated foods may get into the lymph fluids, and get dried up here and there, thus forming CRUSTS and DRIED-UP DEPOSITS of calcium along the lymph ducts.

These tend to form cancers of the lymph ducts and lymph nodes.

************

If the excessive calcium comes from the stuck-up faecal matter (for a prolonged period) that has turned into slimy acid substance, at the colo-rectal region, then, the person gets COLO-RECTAL CANCER.

**********

Often, HABITAUAL LATE-NIGHT diners tend to get ACID REFLUX. 

This can become worse if their food contains too much of oil (e.g., deep-fried items).

This can happen due to the cessation of peristalsis action during late nights, as well as the sleeping (lying flat) posture of the body.

Using a low-level pillow, or sleeping without a pillow can worsen the problem.

Due to all the above, habitual late-night diners tend to facilitate the absorption of calcium by the glandular cells in the gullet.

That can give cancer in the oesophagus.

******

If excessive calcium-carrying urine gets stagnated all the time / kept habitually in the urinal bladder for prolonged periods, the bladder would get cancer there.

********

If a person (in whom excessive calcium habitually accumulates all the time) exposes his body to excessive SUNSHINE, or if happens to take synthetic vitamin-D orally, he would then develop BONE cancer, for the free calcium excesses would get FIXED in the bone.

If not for it, then the BONE MARROW would get cancer in it.

********

When a person’s gullet (oesophagus) gets damaged / eroded due to acid formation during high fever, for instance, the lining there – the adenomatous cells – tend to secrete thick ALKALINE PHLEGM consisting of calcium there.

This happens in order to soothe and protect the injured lining of the gullet.

Thus, in nature, the body appears to produce slimy calcium-based, phlegm-like substance whenever a wound occurs in any part of the body.

Open wounds do get such white protective secretions – often formed by the death of the white cells that come there to combat  invading infectious microbes.

Somewhat similar to the above phenomenon, if a person injures his lung tissues by smoking, the irritation caused induces the secretion of such a calcium-containing phlegm.

That is why smokers tend to cough and spit phlegm all the time.

If such injuries and irritations are continued for a prolonged period, say, several years, then, the secretion of the phlegm containing abundant calcium becomes regularized.

This calcium may accumulate in the tissues of the lungs and give rise to cancers there – the pulmonary calcifications initially, and then the cancer.

In fact, if a wound happens to persist in any part of the body for a very prolonged period, the same phenomenon occurs and gives rise to cancer there.

*******

If a person sleeps without any pillow, or with low-level pillow whereby the head is rested below the level of the body, then, the free water-dissolved calcium can flow through the LYMPH ducts to the BRAIN, and form BRAIN TUMOUR there initially, and cancer at a later stage.

******

Cancers normally do NOT occur in the muscles of the legs or arms.

The reason for this is that calcium accumulations normally do NOT occur in such locations.

Yet, the rare cancer cases (in this part of the body) should be due to calcium accumulations due to some factor.

May be, the person could be wearing extremely tight briefs all the time, thus enhancing the stagnation of lymph-borne calcium in such regions, and thereby the development cancers there.

IN GENERAL, CANCERS DO NOT OCCUR IN PARTS OF THE BODY WHEREEVER THERE IS NO ROOM FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF CALCIUM.

*********

I HAVE GIVEN A COMPLETE PICTURE OF THE ENTIRE THING IN MY BOOK ENTITLED ‘THE TRUE CAUSES OF ALL DISEASES”.

I will soon put it up this as an e-book in the Internet, either in my Website, or as an Amazon.com book.

********
Dear Friends,

The above information is based on my 38 years of research in the area of Ecological Healing System - a Scientific, Evidence-based Alternative medicine I have discovered.

The information I have presented here is completely NEW to the world.

This has not been told by anybody, in any part of the world, in any language, and at any time!

**********
In the meantime,

I beg all of you as my dear friends, to:

(a)  Keep an eye on people who are going to steal my knowledge by way of plagiarism. 

Often, such ‘thieves’ tend to publish their papers as if it is their own original discovery/ findings., watch other researchers publishing this information (my findings) in bits and pieces here and there,

(b)  When you find such publications, may I request you to LET THOSE PUBLISHERS / AUTHORS KNOW THAT DR. PALANI HAS ALREADY PUBLISHED EXACTLY THE SAME INFORMATION MUCH EARLIER, and,

(c) Also inform me that such a publication has come out, so that I too can correct them on the reality of things.

(This kind of activities are bound to happen in the near (or far) future, for ALL I HAVE REPORTED ARE THE TRUTH – undeniable truth, and therefore, anyone in the process of researching is bound to get identical results.

Some of them could be really unaware of my publications. Yet, I deserve the status of being the FOUNDER of these facts – Thanks to you).

My e-mail ID is: vmpalani@streamyx.com

Dear Friends,

If you have any opinion or comments, please send them to me. I will be happy and thankful to you, and would post them in our Blog here

With best wishes and thanks,

Dr.Palani, Ph.D.

.