Dr.V.M.Palaniappan, Ph.D.

Featured Post



Your needs / Objectives / Indemnification

After reading my articles, if you are convinced of their worthiness/ usefulness, you may want to kindly spread the news to your friends suggesting to read what you had read.

My ambition is to reach out to the World Health Organisation, so that my findings will become useful to people worldwide.
I will be happy to cooperate / coordinate with any scientist for the furtherance of my findings.

I am extremely THANKFUL to GOOGLE for their fantastic and free services all the time, for reaching out to the public at large.

Indemnification: All my articles are based on MY OWN research, and I strongly believe that they are true. I have been requesting the W.H.O. and Malaysian Ministry of Health to evaluate my discoveries. Until they are approved for use, the Readers of all my articles should get the approval of a Registered Medical Practitioner prior to practising them, and I should not be held responsible for any mishap at all.

With best wishes and thanks,
Dr. Palani, Ph.D.

Ecological Healing System

ALL THE TIME: Popular Posts

Monday, November 27, 2017



(© 26 November 2017: Dr. V. M. Palaniappan, PhD. vmpalaniappan@gmail.com)

Dear Friends,

I was away from Malaysia for the past about three months, travelling around in India. Hence, I could not evaluate the recent developments in the area of health science.

The first news that drew my attention was in an article in Medical Xpress that had the following headline, and the full story can be read through: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-11-weight-loss-womenin-medium-term.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter 
Exercise alone does not lead to weight loss in women—in the medium term November 23, 2017 by Hans-Peter Kubis, The Conversation. The original article was published in the journal Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism (2017). DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0577 

In brief, people/women who do exercises with a view to reducing their body weight tend to reduce their food intake as well. Hence, one may not be able to say for sure which one gave them the result.

Some scientists subjected women to exercises and monitored their weight loss, and the result is what is revealed in the headlines above.

Dieting is said to help in losing weight, but exercises may not.

According to the scientists, ‘healthy eating’ includes AVOIDANCE of processed and SUGARY food, and also avoidance of SNACKS.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Let us evaluate this finding a little further:

The long-standing belief in the medical world is:

If you eat more food than you spend as energy, that extra is bound to get stored in the body.

Frequent eating, fast food and sugar tend to increase your body weight, and therefore, you are told to avoid them.

That stored food makes you obese. Therefore burn it off, and you will not turn overweight.

They say if you eat sugary food and take snacks frequently, you are bound to put on weight.

It is here I beg to differ:

It is NOT over-eating (or frequent eating of snacks) in terms of energy-providing calories that increases one’s body weight.

For instance, if you are going to eat abundant plain rice – more than what you can spend, you will not put on weight!

On the other hand, if you eat large quantities of cheese, milk, butter, eggs, sea food, biscuits, cakes, chocolates, over-ripe fruits such as tender papaya, etc. you may quickly end up being obese.

Eating meat and other fats tend to put on MEDIOCRE weight in people who live in COLD regions, such as highlands in the tropics, and temperate countries, Polar Regions and the like.

I think, one needs to recollect the body frame of a goat that is native of the tropics, and compare that with a lamb of any of the cold countries.

Both these, similar to rabbits and several other herbivorous animals, graze leafy materials NON-STOP, from dawn until it is dark. However, they do not feed on cheese, butter, eggs, sea food, biscuits, cakes, chocolates, etc.

If you dissect the body of a temperate country’s lamb, you will find a very thick layer of white FAT under their skin.

Whereas, the tropical goat will NOT have such a layer.

Let us see what particular factor contributes to these variations:

Living in cold climate requires the development of a thick fat layer to avoid death due to freezing. Thermal insulation becomes a necessity for survival.

Whereas, living in the warm climate in the tropical countries does not require such a protection. For that matter, excessive layer of fat may melt off in the hot climate.

Hence, in the process of evolution, the above have become genetic.

The presence of fat layer that arises from the food consumed is bound to increase the body weight of the animal in a country with cold climate. The fat layer can be excessively thick if the animal grazes excessive feed.

In the tropical-living animals, the over-consumed feed does NOT seem to form a thick fat layer under the skin, and the weight increase does not seem to be any significant.

If over-eating is to contribute to overweight, why then over-eating RICE does not make a person obese?

Again, if over-eating is the causative factor for obesity, why then the women who did exercises (as said in the article cited above) did not significantly lose weight?

Let us look into it a bit deeper:

In my recognition, over-consumption of food sure would increase the body weight of a person, but only to a SMALL extent.

Whereas, the TRUE OBESITY in the over-eating people appear to be coming from some other source, but that does NOT seem to be from plain CALORY EXCESSES – hence the above-reported finding.

If yes, what exactly can be the causative factor for the problem of overweight and obesity?

The difference between weight contributing group of eatables (viz., cheese, milk, butter, eggs, sea food, biscuits, cakes, chocolates, over-ripe fruits, etc.) and the non-contributing RICE should be the culprit.

What could that be?

The moment one names cheese, butter, egg, etc., what comes immediately to the mind is that they are rich in FAT. Hence, they can be blamed at once.

If fat is what is to be blamed, FISH or other sea food (of course, with some exceptions), biscuits and OVER-RIPE FRUITS may not have significant quantities of fats.

One thing that is common to ALL the weight-contributing eatables, with the exception of over-ripe fruits, is the PRESENCE OF PLENTY OF CALCIUM.

My 42-years of study shows that it is only CALCIUM in EXCESS (than what is needed for the body’s well-being) that makes a person overweight and obese.

How does Calcium mineral make a person overweight or obese?

Likewise, how then the over-ripe fruits, which may not have much calcium in them (in a manner comparable to cheese or seafood), does the same harm?

Let me explain the science of it:

Adult humans need only about 450 or 500 mg of Calcium per day.

 Children, since they need more for growing up, tend to require about 900 or 1000mg daily.

The above being the norm, what would happen when one consumes calcium-rich seafood, calcium-enriched consumables or even calcium supplements?

For certain, the quantity would go high up beyond the coping capacity of the body.

Human body is designed to deal with such abnormalities.

When one consumes far too much of calcium (or any such substance), if and when that happens to be water-soluble, all the excesses get rejected and are pushed into the drainage system – to be part of the LYMPHATIC fluid*.

(* The Calcium  excesses, which are highly alkaline, cannot be carried by the blood because, the pH of the blood would drastically get raised from being pH7.35 or so to a much higher reading, causing instant death of the person. Therefore, the Calcitonin that comes from the Thyroid gland, ‘pushes’ such Calcium excess into the Lymphatic System.)

The lymph takes the Calcium to the urinal bladder, through the kidneys.

When the person urinates, the Calcium excesses would get out of the body, thus leaving the person’s body in a healthy state.

How then a person can turn obese because of the Calcium excesses?

If we take 100 ml of water, and dissolve in it some salt, only a definite quantity of the salt will dissolve. That is called the Saturation Point. The water will not be able to dissolve more than that point.

If a person drinks in a day, say, 2 L of water, and urinates nearly all of it, may be all the Calcium EXCESSES would get dissolved in THAT quantity of water and may get out of the body in the 2 L urine voided.

On the other hand, if that person urinates VERY LITTLE (e.g., about 200 or 300 ml of urine only), then only very little of the Calcium excess would get out of the body, leaving the balance to stay inside the body.

When this pattern becomes a day-to-day practice, large quantities of Calcium would get added up inside the body on a daily basis, resulting in increasing the Calcium OVERLOAD too much.

Now, we have to know where all these Calcium excesses get stored within the body.

Our body is made of CELLS.

Inside the cell, there is a component called MITOCHONDRIA.

The function of the Mitochondria is to absorb CALCIUM (and other minerals) and store it in the cell*.

(* Mitochondria are also involved in controlling the concentration of calcium (Ca2+) ions within the cell. Visit: http://www. biology4kids.com/files/cell_mito.html)

If and when abundant calcium gets stored (often as calcium oxalate crystals) within EACH cell, each cell becomes ENLARGED in size, and becomes heavier in its WEIGHT.

When ALL the cells become inflated thus, the ENTIRE BODY turns BIG-SIZED and HEAVY – resulting in what we call OBESITY!

Thus, it is CALCIUM THAT MAKES THE BODY OBESE, and NOT fats or glycogen or any other form of sugar or calories that make a person that obese*.

(* That is why RICE that contains very little Calcium – about 4 mg or so per 180 gm, compared to cow’s milk that has 120 mg, cheese with about 800 mg, 300 gm pizza with 378 mg, 100 gm sardines in oil with its 400 mg, etc. does NOT make a person obese! (See:  CALCIUM CONTENT OFCOMMON FOODS:  https://www.iofbonehealth. org/osteoporosis-musculoskeletal-disorders/osteoporosis/prevention/calcium/calcium-content-common-foods)

*   *   *   *   *   *

At this, one may want to question me as why should, or how would OVER-RIPE fruits make a person obese?

I have traced and reported the phenomenon in this BLOG in several of my articles. Let me repeat it here to make the evaluation more sensible:

*   *   *   *   *   *  

When we eat vegetable matter, some 70 or 80% of the Calcium does NOT get absorbed by the intestine: that gets thrown out of the body along with the faecal matter. (Visit: https://nortonsafe.search.ask.com/web?q= bioavailability%20of%20calcium%20from %20vegetables&o=APN11910&geo=en_ US&prt=&ctype=&ver=&chn=&tpr=121 )

Why does this happen?

It is because, when the body has already absorbed its 500 mg of Calcium, the brain disallows further absorption of the same mineral.

Therefore, all the unwanted calcium present in the vegetable matter gets thrown out in an unutilised form.

If a person eats over-ripe fruit, or consumes EXCESSIVE FIBRES, then the faeces that is supposed to be in a solid and shapely state, turns SLIMY – often misquoted as “diarrhoea” by physicians.

The water that oozes from the glandular cells that make the lining of the colo-rectal region turns the solid faeces into a slimy state.

This enhances the solubility of the faeces-borne Calcium, which gets absorbed by the colon, gets transferred into the LYMPH fluid, and enters into the SOFT cells of various parts of the body. This will then make the person over-weight and obese.

In fact, eating biscuits, chocolates, and any over-ripe fruit, especially papaya, tends to contribute to Calcium excesses and related overweight.

Thus, it could have become clear by now that it is NOT fats and oils or over-consumption of CALORIES that makes a person overweight or obese, but it is mere CALCUM EXCESS that does so much of harm to humans by making them obese.

I have studied that nearly ALL the obesity-related MAJOR NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES, such as Type-2 Diabetes, Heart Blockages (Athero- Arteriosclerosis), Kidney stone, Hypothyroidism, Prostate enlargement, Breast lumps, Endometriosis, Polycystic Ovary, Fallopian blockages, Cancers, and even white discharges in women, etc. are the result of ACCUMULATION OF FAR TOO MUCH OF CALCIUM EXCESSES WITHIN THE BODY.

Such EXCESSIVE ACCUMULATIONS result essentially due to UNDER-URINATION, enhanced by over-consumption of very high fibre diet, Calcium-enriched eatables and Calcium supplements.

Exercises can burn off the calories, but cannot remove the calcium excesses. It is because of this the exercises do NOT have the ability to reverse the obesity build up in people.

*   *   *   *   *   *

Well friends,

I hope I have done some amount of justice to the most disturbing problem people have been facing worldwide.

I will be happy if the WHO recognises my findings soon, so that people worldwide can begin to live healthily at least form now on.

With best wishes and thanks for reading this.

Dr. Palani, Ph.D.   

Wednesday, July 26, 2017



(© 28 July 2017: Dr. V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D. vmpalaniappan@gmail.com)
(Free Google service is sincerely acknowledged) 

TED talks bring us information that is truly worth listening/learning.
I became much interested when I saw the YouTube posting of such a talk, presented in April 2017, by Dr. Jimmy Lin, entitled “A simple new blood test that can catch cancer early”,

You too may want to listen to him. Here is the URL:

*      *      *      *      *      *
Dr. Lin showed the ‘before and after’ photographs of a patient who is said to have had the ‘skin cancer’, called MELANOMA.

In the first place, I wish to doubt if the diagnosis of the skin condition has been somewhat erroneous.

It appears to have been mistaken for a different disease that is categorised as an ‘incurable rare disease’, called NEURO-FIBROMATOSIS.
I have successfully treated a few identical cases of the above kind.

Referring to one of the cases, his body too had such tumours all over. When corrected (in 2009), the condition disappeared, and never returned, since the treatment was targeted to eradicate the causative factor (that had nothing to do with cancer of any kind). It was question of changing the lifestyle of the patient*.

(* I wish to retain the details of the causative factor and treatment details confidential until the recognition of my findings by WHO.)

I must admit that I did not bother to trace the blood constituents. The DNA test to trace the genetic involvement was totally over-looked.

Dr. Lin, in his talk, tells that the treatment given to the patient with the ‘so-called cancerous tumour’ (what I recognise as Neurofibromatosis) consisted of some procedure that involved administration of some nutrition.

Apparently, the patient is said to have had the disease back again after a while.

Dr. Lin explains in his talk what is normally believed to be the cause for such recurrences.

He explains that, even if the targeted ‘millions of cancer cells’ are well destroyed by the personalised precision drugs, there ‘could be’ a few resistant cancer cells that could have been ‘immune’ to the drugs, and could have ‘survived’ to ‘re-start’ the recurrence of the same cancer.

The above ‘imaginary’ explanation, in my humble opinion, does not even sound to be a hypothesis, since that does not seem to have any evidence to lean on, except that it sounds logical.

*      *      *      *      *      *
Citing example of another lung cancer patient (according to Dr. Lin), the blood test / DNA analysis performed appears have revealed the recurrence after about 350 days – some 100 days prior to the ‘normal’ recognition of the situation. Hence, his finding should be of great help in initiating appropriate treatment with better prospects for survival.

The above methodology of Dr. Lin is bound to add a significant advancement in cancer research.

*      *      *      *      *      *
At this, I have come up with a better deal for an early detection of the problem, even before its onset – meaning, even before an individual could enter into the FIRST STAGE of cancer.

Such a detection is possible without subjecting the ‘potential’ cancer patients to any of the available expensive, medical and invasive imaging procedures, and or radiations.

The following physical procedure, that is perfectly scientific, but considered as somewhat non-medical, can be carried out for ‘scanning’ large human populations at ease, involving much less energy and expenditure.

It is question of the mainstream medical fraternity and pharmaceutical organisations sacrificing to a great extent by allowing this facility to be extended worldwide for saving mankind, incurring huge losses by way of loss of income.

*      *      *      *      *      *
I discovered the following procedure in 1975.

Since then, I have been putting to use for diagnosing the potential cancer patients, and also for saving them from developing the dreaded disaster.

The following description would clarify the details:

*      *      *      *      *      *
Let me start with ONE cell in any of the SOFT tissues in the body.

One of the components in the cell is MITOCHONDRIA.

The mitochondria ‘pulls’ into the cell water-soluble minerals, such as CALCIUM, if that is left UNUSED* by other parts of the body.

(* If vitamin-D is present, the calcium will become part of the bone. In its absence, it will become freely available for any other purpose within the body).

We know our body needs about 450 or 500 mg of calcium DAILY. (It is double in the case of growing-up children).

If we happen to consume too much of calcium (through natural food, water, enriched eatables and drinks and supplements), then that excesses will be excreted as part of the urine.

For effective removal of these excesses, one will have to urinate once every two hours while awake, and that may end up as 8 times or so, daily.

If for any reason if the person happens to UNDER-URINATE, say only 3 times daily, then, most of the calcium EXCESSES will stay inside the body.

Continued and habitual under-urination will enhance accumulation of far too much of calcium excess.  

Some of the ‘locked-up’ calcium excesses from vegetable matter eaten (even up to 70 or 80%) will be thrown out of the body as part of the faeces, defecated daily.

If the person defecates SHAPELESS SLIMY faeces, then, the unutilised calcium in the vegetable matter present in the faeces will get absorbed by the end part of intestine.

This too will add up to large quantities, especially if the person happens to defecate only slimy faeces all the time*.

(* Faeces can become slimy if the person consumes too much fibre, over-ripe fruits (e.g. papaya), chocolates, biscuits, eatables made of highly refined wheat flour, peanuts, etc.)

*      *      *      *      *      *
If and when too much of calcium (more than 500mg in adults) is present within the body in a freely available state, and in the absence of vitamin-D (for want of exposure to sunshine), then, ALL the excesses will get into the cells* that are present in the SOFT tissues all over the body.

(* Transported through the Lymph fluid, and not by blood, due to regulation by the calcitonin.)

When this happens, the calcium excesses, on one hand, will INCREASE the DRY WEIGHT of the body, thus making the person OVER-WEIGHT.

When the soft cells imbibe too much of calcium, the VOLUME of those cells too will ENLARGE, ultimately resulting in making the entire BODY of the person BIG-SIZED. Thus he will become OBESE!

The furtherance of the above procedure for a prolonged period will make the person MORBIDLY OBESE, giving him all the diseases that are related to obesity, including diabetes, heart and stone diseases, and CANCER!

 *      *      *      *      *      *

Now, let me describe the method for determining if the person is going to develop cancer at a later date:

I have classified all the people world-wide (see Palaniappan, 1998-2017) into TEN different categories:

People (irrespective of gender difference) who are extremely thin, who look as if they under-nourished and ‘skeletal’, belong to Category-1 called “SKELETAL”.

If the lower limb (the calf area that has the soleus muscle) is pressed between fingers, it would feel extremely tender and toneless*. 

(*This group of people, as per classification standard, would have a CALF DENSITY of “-40%”. This reading indicates that they body is lacking in its calcium content. Such a calcium inadequacy can be due to inadequate food consumption and over-urination – more than about 14 times daily.

The Skeletal people would have, almost certainly, duodenal ulcer, and the girls would have under-developed breasts. This group of people tend to be highly susceptible to virus-caused diseases (Palaniappan, 1998-2017)

Slightly better-looking people come under “THIN” category. (Their calf density, called calf hardness, or cH for short, would measure “-20”.)

Those who urinate about 8 times daily and eat mediocre food, and also defecate shapely faeces daily, would have a cH of anything between 1 – 20%. This group of people would come under “Perfect” category, and would have no health problem at all.

People with a cH (calf density) of 21-40%, called “Obesity Type-I” would slightly better-looking than the Perfect people.

Those with cH 41-60 would look slightly bigger people, and would be slightly over-weight. They belong to “Obesity Type-II”.

Men and women with cH 61-80 are categorized as “Obesity Type-III”. They look big-sized and over-weight.

When the above people accumulate still more calcium in their tissues, they would end up as HUGE-BODIED people, classified as of “Obesity Type-IV”. Their calf would have a hardness of anything between 81% and 100%.

If an Obesity Type IV person (again, irrespective of sex difference) continues to retain MORE and MORE calcium within his/her body, the body’s tolerance limit – the threshold point – will get crossed over.

The moment the accumulated calcium goes beyond 100%*, the person would almost certainly get one or more of the major obesity-related diseases, such as heart attack, kidney spoilage, stone diseases, type-2 diabetes, and / or CANCER.

(* Once a person falls sick with such a major disease, he will be recognised as a "WITHERED" person, or "W" for short.

From then on, his brain would push off the calcium excesses from his body, usually by means of 'forced urinations'  - e.g., urinary incontinence.

This how and why a person loses his body weight after falling sick with a major disease such as type-2 diabetes).

If excessive calcium accumulates in the breasts of women, it would end up as breast cancer.

If that happens in the cells that make up the prostate gland, then, it would be prostate enlargement initially, and cancer a while later.

Such calcium excesses accumulating and stagnating in the LYMPH fluid, would give rise to LYMPHOBLASTIC cancer.

Thus, the type of cancer that develops in a person depends upon the organ that accumulates those calcium excesses.

*      *      *      *      *      *
When a person comes to my clinic, within minutes his/her CALF DENSITY would get assessed.

If he / she is found to have a cH of 100%, he/she would get treated from then on for a reversal of the calcium accumulation – in other words, he/she will be subjected to DECALCIFICATION*, and that would make the person TOTALLY HEALTHY – similar to the PERFECT category people.

(* I have developed an excellent scientific method for decalcifying a person within a FIVE-WEEK period.)

If a person having a 100% calcification in his/her area (in the soleus muscles) is left untreated, he/she is bound to develop one or more of the obesity-related diseases*, as stated above.

(* When it comes to fertile women (not menopaused yet) with 100% cH, they may get any of the diseases similar to men, but not heart attack as such. This is so because, a lot of calcium gets lost in the menstrual fluid at monthly intervals, thus DECREASING the chances of calcium accumulation in the coronary vessels that would lead to heart attacks. That is why and how, menopaused women get massive heart attacks, it they happen to under-urinate AFTER menopause, for the regular loss of the calcium excesses – as part of the menstrual fluid - does not happen anymore.)

*      *      *      *      *      *
Thus, ALL types of CANCERS, HEART DISEASES, STONE DISEASES, TYPE-2 DIABETES, etc. can be TOTALLY and almost DEFINITELY PREVENTED even before they could develop*.

(* This would then form a far better option, compared to Dr. Jimmy Lin’s DNA/blood test for early recognition of cancer recurrence.)

I have, through my clinical practice in Malaysia, Singapore, and India have helped a large number of people from nearly all of the dreadful diseases.

I have also been communicating with Dr. Margaret Chan, Director General of WHO for the past FIVE YEARS. Now that she is retired, I am in the process of reviving it to the new DG.

*      *      *      *      *      *
We have a HUGE problem here.

That concerns the WORLD ECONOMY.

If and when my discovery gets recognised by WHO, the entire medical curriculum at world level will have to adopt my findings as a major part of their syllabus.

That would mean, a near-total eradication of ALL the diseases from earth’s surface.

If that happens, then the livelihood of nearly one-third of the people worldwide, who directly or indirectly depend upon health-care industry for their bread and butter – especially the drug manufacturers – the pharmaceutical sector, along with instrument manufacturers and medical practitioners, would get devastated.

The world economy would get upset as well.

The above being the case, will the Authorities / Governments worldwide, allow me to save mankind?

If God ‘feels’ that it is high time that humans should start living peacefully in good health, HE would pave a way for me to get through, and my discoveries would get recognised by WHO for implementation all over.

Right now, I am learning Swedish language so that I can deliver my thanks-giving speech in that language to the Nobel-awarding Committee, while receiving it in Sweden, soon!

(Those interested in referring to my publications: 349 articles in THIS BLOG, 167 publications in various media since 1975, 20 books since 1998, 60 ASTRO TV health-care talk shows, and news releases of my discoveries by Malaysian BERNAMA (International) News Agency are welcome to contact me, or refer to some of the previous postings in this Blog.)

With thanks for reading this.
Dr. Palani, Ph.D.









Monday, July 10, 2017


(© 10 July 2017: Dr. V. M. Palaniappan, Ph.D. vmpalaniappan@gmail.com)
(Ack: Googles is sincerely thanked for their free services)

Dear Dr. Nathan Richardson​,

Thank you for your communication.

It is with interest I looked at your United States Infographic Statistics 2017-20130, and am much impressed about your fascinating study.

(Let me cite here the relevant URL that would lead interested readers to reach your very interesting presentation there: http://www.biggiesboxers.com/united-states-obesity-infographic-statistics-2017-to-2030/)

Ever since I recognised the TRUE causative factors of obesity, I have always been feeling bad whenever I read people referring to the so-called 'bad' lifestyle, referring particularly to NOT doing exercises to spend the over-consumed calories ('sedentary lifestyle') and all matters related to food, particularly fats, oils, carbohydrates ('unutilised calories') and the like.

In your work on US Infographic Statistics work, I could see references being made to fructose, calories, etc. as well.

I am of the firm opinion, based on my 43 years of study, that it is NOT just adipose tissue that gives rise to MORIBID OBESITY.

Overeating high calorie food and under-exercising may add on to the adipose build up in the COLD countries to SOME extent, but how about the hot-climate-prevailing equatorial countries?

Sheep in cold regions are designed to build adipose tissue at sub-cutaneous levels for purposes of withstanding freezing temperatures - hence, genetic! (If they are raised in Malaysia, for instance, they would not grow up bare-skinned.)
The tropical GOATS, even if raised in the cold climate, would NOT build a thick layer of fat under its skin - they would simply perish, for want of protection.

If one can attribute the obesity in people to fat-building in the TEMPERATE climate, how would you explain overweight & obesity build-ups in the very hot climate - among people of tropical origin?

My finding is: the adipose tissue build up in people of cold countries does occur, but only to an insignificant extent, and certainly NOT to the extent of giving rise to anything related to MORBID OBESITY-related diseases.

Again, what exactly is there in the ADIPOSE TISSUE (fat) that can give all of the major diseases that arise on attaining the obesity status?

Also, why is it that NOT all the obese people are not getting those dreadful diseases?

Unless you (I mean, all the scientists involved in obesity or related researches) accept my studies / findings / interpretations, you will not be able to provide a meaningful answer!

The reality, time and again I have traced, appears to be related NOT to over-eating AS SUCH, but to the extent to which the over-eaten food contains the mineral CALCIUM, and the extent to which that adds up to a level that is beyond the body's tolerance limit - the threshold point!

When a person overeats, if he/she turns overweight and obese WITHOUT any of the diseases, only then THAT can be attributed to the build up of CALORIES.


If the overweight and obesity are caused due to the accumulation of CALCIUM as I have brought to recognition, then, no amount of starvation and calorie expenditure through any means would make the person disease-free!

Mere reduction in the body weight only through avoidance or losses of calories would never ever remove the stone diseases, heart blockages including athero/arteriosclerosis, hypothyroidism, endometriosis, polycystic ovaries, tumours and cancers in any part of the body, and also Type-2 Diabetes!

On the other hand, I have CURED numerous cases of nearly all the diseases related to MORBID OBESITY, simply be the REMOVAL of the Calcium EXCESSES - through a process of DECALCIFIATION I have developed. 

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
ALL the above (my statements) would become evident if you can answer the following question:
If the build of excessive calories is the causative factor for morbid obesity, why then when people STARVE (almost similar to Anorexis nervosa-kind) for even prolonged periods, STILL KEEP ON BECOMING INCRESINGLY OBESE?
As per my finding, the answer is:
(1) UNDER-URINATE accumulate too much of the mineral CALCIUM - the unwanted Ca excesses that are supposed to get out of the body in a dissolved state in the urine, gets retained within the body (for, the smaller quantities of urine will not be able to 'carry' in it beyond its saturation point) - and gets stored in EACH of the SOFT cells enhanced by the Mitochondria present within each of those cells. This contributes to VOLUME INCREASE AS WELL AS DRY WEIGHT INCREASE! 
(2) ANOTHER source of Ca increase within the body has relevance to people defecating SLIMY FAECES (watery, diarrhoea-like) most of the time, induced by very high fibre consumption (over-ripe fruits, chocolates, biscuits, refined glutinous/wheat flour, etc.). 

We know very well that some 70 or 80% of the Calcium present in the vegetable matter consumed does NOT get absorbed by the gastro-intestinal system, and that gets thrown out of our body as part of the body.

All the explanations offered in this regard, I am sure, you would have found them very vague! 

The truth is, when our body has already received the required quantity of calcium at any one time from any source (such as very easily water-soluble natural calcium present in most the consumed liquids and food, calcium-enriched eatables, supplements), the brain REJECTS ANY EXCESS THAT MAY BECOME AVAILABLE. 

Rejecting 'locked-up' calcium present in the vegetable matter is relatively a lot easier than rejecting the already water-dissolved calcium!

In other words, the calcium contents in vegetable matter, unless they are easily soluble in water, are just left ;unprocessed', and thus they become part of the defecated matter. 

The Ca being alkaline, keeps the faecal matter in a consolidated SOLID shape.
If one consumes very high fibre or anything such as over-ripe papaya, chocolates, biscuits, and the like, the faeces turns SLIMY - slightly WATERY!

This releases the hither-to-locked-up Ca, and the Adenomatous glandular cells present at the lining of the GI tract (essentially at the colo-rectal region) to absorb such Ca - only to end up in gathering MORE CALCIUM THAN NEEDED.

If these Ca excesses from the faecal matter get absorbed at nocturnal times (while a person is asleep, without any physical movement), naturally, for want of LYMPH MOBILITY*, those excesses tend to STAY within the cells of the ADENOMA themselves, resulting in their (mis-described) INFLAMMATION - only to develop into a COLO-RECTAL CANCER! 

(* I hope no one would question me about the mode of transportation of the calcium excesses.  For the benefit of non-biologists, let me highlight the following:

The calcium excesses will have to be transported through the LYMPH fluid, and NOT through the blood stream, for any calcium (being alkaline) addition would raise the blood pH to an enormous level from being 7.4 or so, and that can result in the immediate death of the person, unless, of course, the CALCITONIN that secretes from the thyroid gland pushes such calcium excesses, again, into the LYMPH fluid!)

if the above process happens by DAY-TIME while the person's muscles enhance the LYMPH flow, then all the Ca excesses thus absorbed from the colo-rectal regions tend to get pushed to various locations in the body, which may give rise to a wide variety of illnesses, such as inflammations, lumps, tumours and cancers. 

Ca thus pushed apart and scavenged by the soft cells that make up the PROSTATE GLAND for purposes of synthesising SEMEN tend to SWELL up, thus giving rise to PROSTATE ENLARGEMENT - and to cancer there, along with time and further progression*.

(* If the obesity is due the accumulation of fat cells - the adipose tissue, why should the prostate gland get enlarged?)

The SAME, if it happens during day time in women, those soft cells that make up the Lactiferous cells in the breast scavenge and absorb these Ca excesses - of course for the purpose of synthesising milk for the baby.

In the absence of pregnancy, they accumulate within the soft cells of the milk ducts there and form BREAST LUMPS*, only to give rise to BREAST CANCER, again, along with time and further progression of the same process.

(*  Again, if the obesity is due to the adipose tissues, why should a woman develop breast lumps? Does the breast lump formed in a woman filled with adipose tissue? Are the lumps made of mere fat cells?)

Of course, if the person happens to consume EXTRA calcium from food and drinks, and also from SUPPLEMENTS (with the assumption that Calcium to ANY EXTENT - ANY AMOUNT IN UNLIMITED QUANTITIES IS GOOD (?), IN ADDITION TO UNDR-URINATION & DEFECATING SLIMY FAECES, then naturally, ALL OTHER SOFT TISSUES IN THE BODY would receive those Ca excesses, only to retain them within their own cells, again, helped by the mitochondria!*

(* Professor Emeritus Dr. VR. Muthukkaruppan, an authority on studies related to Mitochondria will have to tell us if the Mitochondria attracts FATS into the cells and turn EACH cell into an inflamed state, and then promote mitotic cell divisions to the extent of forming lumps.

As per my study, it is calcium excess - its accumulation beyond the tolerance limit or the threshold point of that cell that enhances its 'break-up' mitotically into two cells, and facilitating the process to go on until the continued input of calcium is stopped.)

ALL the soft cells serve as STORAGE organs, for want of space for storage of the unwanted Ca excesses.

This would result in the ELARGEMENT of EACH of those cells, and the DRY MATTER would add on to the overall WEIGHT of THAT person,

As a result of all these, THE BODY TURNS OBESE – since the Ca excesses are going to perform foul-play, it would become MORBIDLY OBESE!

Thus, dear Mr Nathan Richardson, the whole world, unfortunately, has been hitherto misbelieving with the wrong notion that it is over-eating, calorie excess, lack of exercises, etc. are responsible to adipose build up, and that is what makes a person morbidly obese. 

Again, no one seems to have explained as why or what makes some people morbidly obese while some others remain healthy. Mine does!

Thank you Mr. Richardson for giving me an opportunity to let you know my findings – especially because you are an important personality to whom it occurred to me that I should convey the matter.

If you have the power and influence, kindly bring my findings to the open for the recognition of WHO and important health-oriented bodies.
I have so far written 20 books, of which 17 are directly relevant to human health.

Two of the books are on OBESITY: CAUSES, CURE, AND PREVENTION.

My books are well appreciated in this part of the world.

I have been communicating with WHO authorities and several important scientists scattered all over the world for the past decade.

Besides the above, I have published 348 ORIGINAL articles in my BLOG: http:/ecohealingsystem.blogspot.com on most relevant health-care matters.
I have also published some 167 papers on multivariate media.

Malaysian (International) News Agency BERNAMA has published my works, at various times, since year 2000.
Since a month, I have started presenting my findings through YouTube in TAMIL language – my mother tongue.  Soon, I intend to do likewise in English as well.

Many, in different countries, have been slowly, in bits and pieces, have been‘ re-discovering’ my findings – often claiming that those are their own findings being reported for the first time! Eh! Diplomatically executed plagiarism?
Most probably, I will be publishing THIS reply of mine to you in my blog, for the benefit of people at large.

Kindly let me know if you will have any objection to adding in that article YOUR name and identity. (If not, I will publish it, addressing to Mr.X or so). Thanks.
Thanks, and with best wishes and regards,

Dr. Palani, Ph.D.
(Dated: 9 July 2017)
Blog: http://ecohealingsystem.blogspot.comMobile: 6-012-2071414.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.