WHAT MAKES THE DIABETICS URINATE FREQUENTLY?

RECOGNITION OF DR. PALANI'S DISCOVERY MAY SAVE HUMANS FROM TYPE-2 DIABETES

Part-1: WHAT MAKES THE DIABETICS URINATE FREQUENTLY? WHY AND HOW DOES IT HAPPAN?

(© 15 November 2016: Dr. V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D.

e-Mail: vmpalaniappan@gmail.com; Mobile: 6-012-2071414.)

(The excellent platform provided by Googles is gratefully acknowledged)

You may want to view it yourself the nice Infographic by Siti Fatmah, released today (15 November 2015) by MIMS (Malaysia), entitled “The history of diabetes across the centuries” through the following URL:

http://today.mims.com/topic/infographic--the-history-of-diabetes-across-the-centuries-?country=Malaysia  &channel=gn-health-wellness&elq_mid=8165&elq_cid=4465
It appears an Egyptian Physician wrote for the first time some 3500 years ago about diabetes as a disease of frequent urination*.

(* According to the South Indian Siddha medicine, such a recognition dates back to 5000 years, and the diagnostic method they used had relevance to ants gathering around the sweet urine voided by the diabetics.)

Let me ask you this question:
Why should the brain induce frequent urination?

Please evaluate the above PHYSIOLOGY, comparing it with the following analogies:

(Analogy = When only one (or very few) aspect is comparable, it is called ANALOGY.
If ALL aspects are IDENTICAL, then it is called HOMOLOGY)

Analogy-1:

A mosquito injects into just one spot in your skin some concentrated venom.

That concentrate can kill all those cells at that spot.

Wanting to save the cells, the brain creates itch.

When it itches, you scratch.

The scratching disperses the venom to several adjacent cells, and that dilutes the venom, and thereby the venom loses its ‘power’ to kill the cells there.

Then, the itch stops.


Analogy-2: You keep sitting cross-legged for a long duration.

A while later the blood supply there will get impeded, and the resulting short-supply of oxygen can kill the tissues there.

To save the muscles, the brain creates a sensation of needle pricks.

This makes you massage that part of the body violently, and the free blood supply will resume. 

The pricking sensation too would stop immediately.                   

Analogy-3:

The dusts dispersed from a dusty carpet while cleaning it enter into your lungs, begin to irritate, and make you sneeze.

The sneezing is induced by the brain in order to remove those dust particles from blocking your breathing holes – the alveoli, thus saving your life from death due to choking.

Analogy-4:

Someone throws chilli powder into your eyes.

Your brain induces secretion of tears in large quantities. The purpose being to cleanse the tender eyes from getting severely damaged.

Analogy-5:

You see someone taking poison with the idea of committing suicide – may be because of his MIND is unable to withstand love failure.

The BRAIN does not want to accept death. SURVIVAL is its prime goal.

So, the brain induces PROFUSE SWEATING, and traces of the poison can be found dissolved in that sweat.

The brain induces uncontrollable urinations, and traces of the poison can be found dissolved in that urine.

The brain induces uncontrollable diarrhoea, and traces of the poison can be found mixed in that slimy faeces.

The brain induces shedding of tears, and traces of the poison can be found in that tears.

The brain induces running nose (sinusitis-like), and traces of the poison can be found in that slimy oozing liquid.

The brain gives him seizure (epilepsy), and that increases the blood pressure, which in turn enhances speedy transportation of the poison to all possible outlets for its elimination, before death could incur.

ALL THE ABOVE ARE BRAIN'S WAY OF SAVING THE BODY FROM DETERIORATION AND DEATH.

                                              *   *   *   *   *   *
Now, let us evaluate the occurrence of FREQUENT URINATIONS in TYPE-2 DIABETICS:

If you are a diabetic, your body voids plenty of urine frequently.

Why should your brain do that?

The brain wants to REMOVE ‘something’ that can either kill you, or damage your body severely.

That ‘something’ can be:

(a) the UNUTILISED SUGAR that keeps floating in your blood., or

(b) it can be any other POISON that has accumulated inside the body.

That sugar can ROT your (various) tissues, and eventually cause death*.

(* How exactly the Type-2 Diabetes develops?

Well, this aspect will be explained in PART-2 of this topic - that will be posted in due course.)

If that happens to be some kind of poison, that too can kill the tissues likewise.

Your brain wants to save you from that disaster, and therefore, induces frequent urinations ONLY IN ORDER TO REMOVE THAT UNUTILIZED SUGAR OR THE UNSUITABLE SOMETHING.

If tested, that something in the urine thus voided can be recognized.

 Now, what would happen if WE, by some means - may be with the use of some pharmaceutical DIURETICS drugs (such as Lasix Furosemide), induce MUCH MORE FREQUENT URINATIONS?

That unwanted and unsuitable ‘something’ + unutilized sugar would get leached out of the body rapidly (and fully), thus making the body RESTORE ITS FULL HEALTH.

Now, the question is, WHAT CAN BE THAT UNSUITABLE ‘SOMETHING’, and why or how do they accumulate to such enormous quantities?

To find the answer to this, we have to understand the body physiology of ALL ANIMALS on earth.

                                                     *   *   *   *   *   *

God, Nature, or the Process of Evolution has created a common feature in ALL animals – from tiny microorganism such as bacteria to 'giant-sized' elephants, or the most advanced humans:

Nature knows that our (or any animal’s) body would produce some end-products during the process of living.

These end products (e.g., carbon dioxide in plants and animals, faecal matter in animals) will have to be removed from the body, lest they would ruin their healthy existence.

Nature also knows that it is possible for the entry of exertional poisons into the body through water, air, and/or food.

In other words, one’s own poisons as well as those that may enter into the body from external sources will have to be removed on a regular basis.

Such a removal occurs through:

1. Defecation of faecal matter, and
2. Excretion of URINE.

We have learnt in Chemistry that each WATER-SOLUBLE substance has a definite SATURATION POINT – that is the capacity to dissolve in water.

Each toxic substance can have a different dissolving capacity.

To simplify the explanation, let us say, 5 teaspoons of poisons enter into our body through the air - being air-borne gaseous pollutants that may dissolve in water.

Another 5 teaspoons through the liquids / water (e.g., chlorine, preservatives in soft drinks, etc.).

Yet another 5 teaspoons through the food we eat (e.g., pesticides, preservatives, etc.)

These, making a total of 15 teaspoons, will have to be removed from the body daily, through URINATIONS.

Let us assume that only ONE teaspoon of the poisons would dissolve and get removed from the body in 100 ml of urine voided.

That (15 teaspoons of the poisons) may require a person to void 1500 ml of URINE.

If we drink 1 glass of water, some of it would get lost as sweat through the skin, as vapour from the expired air, from eye surface, and the like. As a result, 1 glass water intake may produce only ¾ glass of urine.

This would then mean that, if we want to void 1500 ml of urine, we may have to drink 2 L of water.

That is to say, if we drink 2 L of water daily, and URINATE 1.5 L of URINE also daily, then, ALL of the poisons may get out of our body, leaving it in a healthy state.

If, say, 200 ml of urine is excreted every time we void, then, we have to urinate 7½ times, or sensibly, about EIGHT TIMES DAILY.

At this, an important question arises:

What would happen if we do NOT urinate 8 times or 1500 ml of urine daily?

THE POISONS WOULD GET STAGNATED WITHIN THE BODY.

THAT WOULD KEEP ON ACCUMULATING TO ENORMOUS QUANTITIES, IF WE CONTINUE TO UNDER-URINATE!

Let us see what it can be:

In our example, 2 teaspoons of poison will get removed from the body through 1 urination of 200 ml.

If a person is going to drink 2 L of water, he must urinate 8 times to remove the whole lot of 15+ teaspoons of the poisons.

If a person urinates only THREE times daily, his body would throw out 600 ml of urine which will contain only SIX teaspoons of the poisons.

That means, about 10 teaspoons of the poisons would stay back within the body EACH DAY.

At this rate, in ONE YEAR his body would have accumulated (365 x 10) 3650 teaspoons of it.

This will be 36,500 teaspoons in 10 years.

Under normal circumstances, our (or any animal’s) body has tremendous tolerance limits for any adverse conditions.

I have found (clinically) that those who under-urinate this way – only thrice daily, to develop TYPE-2 DIABETES IN ABOUT 8 YEARS’ TIME*.

(* As indicated above, the exact sequence of type-2 diabetes development will be explained in Part-2 of this article, at a later date, in this Blog).

Based on our assumed quantifications, it appears that the tolerance limit for a person is to withstand some 30,000 teaspoons of the poison before he would turn into a Type-2 Diabetic patient.

Thus, if a person regularly urinates only TWICE daily*, the 30,000 tolerance limit would arrive at an earlier date – in about 5½ years’ time.

(* Mr. X was unemployed until his 25th age, so he has been urinating liberally, just by responding to the urge for urination.

Subsequently, he worked as a JUNIOR for next five years. He had adequate free time to urinate then and there.

In his 30, he was appointed an EXECUTIVE, and he became fully occupied with works, meetings, seminars, and the like that he had NO free time to frequent the toilet.

Further, if he urinates frequently, the staff there could mistake him to have had diabetes.

In addition, having become a highly paid executive, he has started drinking fruit juices and the like, rather than drinking plain water.

Thus, from his 30th year, he has REDUCED his urination frequency to just ONCE during office hours, and twice at home.

 The Air-Conditioner is his office DEHYDRATES (sucks most of his body water as an unrecognizable, 'insensible perspiration'). As a result, he does not get the urinal pressure any more. Further, only very little urine gets excreted.

His body begins to smell urine, which he does not recognise, but others do.

Since the 'toxic' substances are accumulating within his body (stored in the soft cells), he puts on weight. That, naturally, gets attributed to his becoming wealthy.

When he reaches 36, he goes for an EXECUTIVE MEDICAL CHECK-UP, since the medical bill is paid by his office. 

The doctor tells him he has developed TYPE-2 DIABETES!

About two decades ago, this disease was called Rich Man's Disease, or "Executive's Disease".

Nowadays, nearly all the office-going people tend to work in air-conditioner environment, and that makes nearly all of them diabetic!

I have found the following:

If you drink 2 L of water, and urinate about 8 times or so daily, you tend to remain HEALTHY all the time, in spite of taking sugary food and plenty of carbohydrates. 

From time immemorial, ALL people in the tropical countries have been eating RICE (carbohydrate) as their staple food, ate sugared snacks daily, and they never developed diabetes. 

The people belonging to COLD countries took meat mostly with wheat, essentially because rice would not grow in their land - imports and exports didn't exist during the ancient periods.

SUGAR IS NOT THE CULPRIT, BUT REDUCED WATER CONSUMPTION & UNDER-URINATION ARE!

If a person drinks 2L or MORE of water, and UNDER-URINATES (e.g., thrice or four times only) he develops just type-2 diabetes.

If he drinks very little water (e.g, just 200 or 300 ml) and therefore UNDER-URINATES, he appears to get HEART ATTACK & TYPE-2 DIABETES.

A person drinking only fruit juices, soft drinks, and soups (and NO water at all), AND UNDER-URINATES (about twice or thrice), tends to get CANCER.

He who does NOT drink any kind of liquid at all has been found to develop LEPROSY!
(Brain tries to remove from the body the much-concentrated poisons by rotting the tissues)

(I was able to completely cure a few leprosy patients, and the major part of the treatment included training the patient to drink water and void urine adequately, as part of the detoxification programme.)

He who urinates FOUR times daily, would become diabetic in about 11 years.

Thus, one urinating FIVE times daily, would get it in about 14 years’ time.

He who urinates SIX times, would turn diabetic only after about 22 years or so.

So, if a person wants to stay in a health state forever, without getting the type-2 diabetes, he should drink about 2 L of water (not soft drinks, juices, soups, etc.), and urinate about 8 times daily.

                                                  *   *   *   *   *   *
I have conveniently skipped explaining as how does the brain work in this case to induce the type-2 diabetes, and WHAT EXACTLY THAT POISON IS.

Similar to the examples explained as ANALOGIES above, when the body accumulates poisons beyond its tolerance limit - the “threshold point”, the BRAIN induces / forces / compels  the body parts to EXCRETE urine FREQUENTLY, so that all the accumulated poisons would get removed from the body, allowing it to be in ‘relatively’ a healthy state.

The term ‘relatively’ has some relevance:

If ALL the 30,000 teaspoons of the poisons get stagnated within the body - exceeding the body’s tolerance limit, then the body WOULD STRAIGHT AWAY:

(a) Begin to rot and decompose giving rise to gangrene.

(b) The eyes would develop cataract and go blind.

(c) The penis would develop erectile dysfunction (impotency) and turn the person sterile.

(d) The nerves would collapse, and lose its function, and

(e) The entire body too would collapse, resulting in the DEATH of that person soon.

On the other hand, if the brain can induce the occurrence of Type-2 Diabetes which is linked with increased and frequent urination THAT would eliminate substantial quantities of poisons from the accumulated 30,000 teaspoons. This would then keep the person ALIVE for several more years, instead of an instant death.

(The development of type-2 diabetes can be categorized as an auto-immune disease, very much similar to osteoporosis.)

                                                    *   *   *   *   *   *

Well Friends,

I hope you are able to realize the facts related to Type-2 Diabetes.

In brief, it is the HABITUAL UNDER-URINATION that gives rise to Type-2 Diabetes, and this has absolutely NOTHING to do with eating too much of sugar or carbohydrates!

Since the Medical Fraternity has missed to understand this phenomenon, they are not only NOT able to CURE the Type-2 Diabetes, but are unable to even CONTROL it. That is precisely why the number of sufferers has been going higher and higher along with time.

YOU CAN NEVER-EVER SUCCEED UNLESS MY FINDING IS RECOGNISED.
ONLY THE WHO (World Health Organisation) CAN HELP THE HUMANITY AT LARGE!

May I therefore urge Dr. Margaret Chan - the Director General of WHO to quickly recognise me.

Since we cannot expect Dr. Margaret Chan, as the DG of WHO, to read this kind of BLOG-posted articles, only those who happen to read my (this) article & this BLOG, should take up the matter to the DG's attention, so that the millions world-wide can be saved at once.

In the name of GOD, may I request every Reader of this article to do his/her best to help humanity.

I will soon post my SECOND PART of this article that would explain in exact terms the POISON that give rise to Type-2 diabetes.

With thanks and best wishes,
Dr. Palani, Ph.D.

MORE TOWARDS SOLVING A GENETIC MYSTERY IN TYPE-1 DIABETES

	MORE TOWARDS SOLVING A GENETIC MYSTERY IN TYPE-1 DIABETES (© 13 April 2016: Dr.V.M.Palaniappan, Ph.D.)  Large number of medical researchers must have read with great interest the following article that appeared in Medical Xpress (April,11, 2016), and earlier on in Genes and Immunology.  Even before we can discuss my ADDITIONAL, but EARLIER input into this area of research, it would make things easier for non-medical people to understand this very important problem to read the introductory part of what has been published in Medical Xpress: (http://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-04-genetic-mystery-diabetes.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=ctgr-item&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter): Solving a genetic mystery in type 1 diabetes According to Stephan Kissler, Ph.D., Investigator in the Section on Immunobiology at Joslin Diabetes Center and Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School (Originally published in: Genes and Immunology): In type 1 diabetes, the immune system attacks the body's own insulin-producing cells. Scientists  don't understand what triggers the attack or how to stop it Now the Kissler lab has shown one way in which one such gene, called RGS1, may help to foster the autoimmune attack. In the attack, immune cells called T cells infiltrate the pancreas and damage the insulin-producing beta cells. Inhibiting RGS1 didn't prevent autoimmune diabetes from happening … in humans … We're continuing to test a number of other genes to see if one strikes us as being a very potent modifier of type 1 diabetes … … this piece of information about RGS1 might become valuable down the line when we know more about other genes… ******** Let me simplify the entire matter, by avoiding the use of too many medical terms, for the benefit of our Blog Readers:  For that matter, even the medical researchers should read this, for the information contained in this throws light on the possibility of a complete cure of the problem.  For a while, let us keep away the intrinsic details concerning the   genes and genetics. Let us talk of what we can understand at ease:  We are very much aware that there are few types in Diabetes:  1.    Type-1 diabetes mellitus, also called Juvenile Diabetes (in the past) or Insulin-Dependent Diabetes mellitus. 2.    Type-2 diabetes mellitus, also called Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. 3.    Diabetes insipidus, characterised by frequent urination. 4.    Pregnancy diabetes, also called Gestational diabetes, and 5.    Drug-induced diabetes.  Certain cells called Beta cells that are present in Pancreas secrete Insulin hormone.  Insulin digests sugar (carbohydrates).  If Insulin production is LESS, all the eaten sugar will not get digested. This results in type-2 diabetes.  To keep the sugar (carbohydrates) digestion in order, insulin supplements are given to the patient, in the form of drugs.  If insulin is given as a supplement from external sources, then there is no need for the Beta cells in the Pancreas even to try to secrete insulin.  (When such a thing occurs in the Thyroid gland, that is, if the thyroxin secretion is NOT enough, then the Thyroid STIMULATING Hormone (TSH) is secreted. THAT induces the gland to secrete MORE thyroxin.)  When it comes to diabetes, there is NO such thing as ‘Insulin STIMULATING hormone’.   However, the sugar WE EAT as part of the food works as Insulin Stimulating Hormone.  In other words, If we eat normal amount of sugar, normal amount of insulin secretes.  If we REDUCE sugar consumption, Insulin secretion also gets reduced.  If we INCREASE sugar uptake, insulin secretion INCREASES proportionately.  This is how the pancreas functions.  *********** Problem would arise if and when abnormal happenings occur.  Like everything else, our body has an optimum / best RANGE when it concerns SUGAR REQUIREMENT.  There is a minimum and maximum for such sugar requirements.  If and when we consume MUCH LESS sugar than the MINIMUM, we become totally energyless, and we can faint, and can even die.  At the other extreme, if and when we consume TOO MUCH sugar than the MAXIMUM our body can tolerate, that too can make us die.  If we consume MUCH LESS sugar, our brain does the following to make us consume MORE sugar, in order to save us from ultimate death.  It makes us feel energyless and exhausted. Our brain gives us a strong desire to eat sugar – a craving occurs. When we eat, the craving stops.  If we OVER-CONSUME TOO MUCH of sugar, our body does the following, in order to save us from ultimate death:  To start with we get the feeling of ENJOYMENT while eating sugar. It is pleasurable.  Once the NEED for sugar is over, we FEEL SATISFIED. So, we want to stop eating more of the sugar.  If we continued eating sugar, then our brain gives us a feeling of HATE. We hate to eat more sugar – we get disgusted, in spite of that food being delicious.  At this stage, let us say some one forces us at gun-point to eat still more sugar.  If and when we eat more, our brain makes us VOMIT, just to save us from the ultimate danger of death.  Our brain, instead of making us vomit, could have simply increased the insulin production to solve the problem at least as a temporary measure.  In reality, the brain does that too, but only as a temporary measure.  However, if we keep on continuing the eating of more and more sugar, and if ALL such sugars are digested with abundant insulin secretion, then the FAR TOO MUCH OF THE DIGESTED SUGAR will kill the cells and us, ultimately - the tissues would rot - similar to the GANGRENE that occurs in the long-term diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood sugar levels all the time, necessitating the amputation of the toes or lower part of the leg.  So, there is a definite need for the brain to totally put a full stop to the eating of too much of sugar.  The brain, since time immemorial, from the time of becoming Homo sapiens from being Apes, or even before that, has associated SWEET TASTE to SUGARS.  In other words, if SUGAR does NOT TASTE sweet, then our brain will NOT induce the secretion of Insulin.  The taste buds in the tongue, the brain, the pancreas, etc. are well inter-connected, inter-dependent, and remain well-coordinated, helped by SALT (Sodium) in its capacity as an essential ELECTROLYTE.  Since a century, Man (not any other animal) has become so intelligent that he has developed capabilities to HIDE the sweet taste from being felt by the taste buds in the tongue*.  (* Similar to adding a likeable perfume to the poisonous mosquito or cockroach killer poison, the original smell of which is extremely bad and repulsive. We would avoid inhaling bad smell, whereas we would  inhale much deeply if perfumed. That results in poisoning our brain and body.)    If for instance, sugar is filled inside CAPSULES, and if the capsules are just gulped, instead of chewing, then our brain will have no knowledge of the entry of THAT sugar into the body.   As a result, brain may not induce insulin secretion, and THIS encapsulated sugar will NOT get digested.   So, the undigested sugar will have to keep floating in the body fluids, doing all possible damages for the well-being of the body*.  (* Swallowing food without chewing will be similar to consuming capsules.  This is one of the major reasons why we must chew our food before swallowing.    In fact, I have recorded that nearly ALL the type-2 diabetic people do NOT chew their food, but gulp them rapidly: see Palaniappan, V.M., 1998. Obesity: Causes, Cure, and Prevention. ISBN 967-9988-0508. 471pp.)  In theory:   If we happen to consume all sugars only in the form of capsules, or if we SWALLOW our food rapidly all the time, as described above, our brain will have no knowledge of the ‘smuggled’ sugar, and thereby loses its management potentials. In other words, our brain gets deceived*.  (* This would happen to Astronauts, if they depend upon encapsulated diet for their survival.)  As a result, FAR TOO MUCH OF SUGAR ends up within the body, and disproportionate insulin quantities leave them to float in the blood in an undigested manner.  This can bring about the death of the cells and the person, as described above.  AT THIS, AN EMERGENCY TO SAVE THE BODY FROM DEATH HAS RISEN!  What can be done?  The best possible measure appears to be a TOTAL STOPPAGE OF THE INSULIN PRODUCTION!  Thus, TWO emergency situations can warrant instantaneous stoppage of insulin production:  1.    When a person consumes awful lot of sugars (recognisable by the taste buds in the tongue), almost non-stop, beyond the body’s tolerance limit, thus inducing the secretion of TOO MUCH of insulin -, beyond the true need.  2.    When sugar is pumped into the body in a hidden state, essentially due to gulping the food without chewing*.  (* 'Pumping' glucose into the body, avoiding the buccal and gastro-intestinal channel, for longer durations would equal this.) Irrespective of the mode of sugar entry, if there happens to be too much of sugar within the body, the best way appears to be a TOTAL STOPPAGE of insulin secretion.  If and when THAT happens, the person gets TYPE- 1 DIABETES.   WE SIMPLY CALL THIS LIFE-SAVING HELP RENDERED BY THE BRAIN AN "AUTO-IMMUNE DISEASE".     IF SUCH AN 'AUTO-IMMUNE DISEASE' DOES NOT HAPPEN, WE WOULD DIE!   THAT BEING THE CASE, INSTEAD OF CALLING IT AN AUTO-IMMUNE DISEASE, WE SHOULD CALL IT "ALTERNATIVE LIFE SAVING MEASURE", RATHER THAN CALLING IT A DISEASE. ******   In Type-I diabetes, if the Beta cells in the Pancreas are NOT dead yet (if it is an early stage), then a REVERSAL should be possible.  In Type II, where the Beta cells are alive but it is only question of LESSER insulin secretion, then a REVERSAL appears to be almost DEFINITELY POSSIBLE.  *********** What I have explained above is all that happens at MACRO-level.  However, if you want to go academic, and if we are to trace the detailed changes at ‘micro-‘ or even at ‘ultra-micro level’ (similar to seeing detailed cellular structures through an electron microscope), then of course, we have to recognise the sequences related to the genes and their interplay.  It would be even more interesting to see the sequence at ‘Nano’ levels.  Irrespective of the approach, the result will be the same.  At macro-level, it would be simple to understand and practise, but will be unimpressive, and may appear as ‘unscientific’.   The other academic approach will be extremely impressive, and much complicated to understand, but will form a necessity for academic excellence. The Ph.D candidates will have to be trained this way to think and interpret information much intricately.  Unfortunately, we do not seem to have much time to wait any further, particularly because the sufferings and the rate of death due to diabetes alone (besides the health-care expenditures), appear to be crossing over the bearable limits of nearly all the nations around the world.  ******** We need to address this issue somewhat ungently.   It should not matter who does the job. Egoism, professional protectionism, so-called medical ethics, etc. should be kept aloof.  It should not matter which discipline of medicine helps to achieve success. All we need is a successful stoppage of the problem, if possible, all at once.  In the first place, WHY IS IT THAT ALL THE RESEARCH FINDINGS DONE HITHERTO WORLD-WIDE DO NOT SEEM TO HAVE THE POTENTIALS TO ERADICATE THE DISEASE?  It should be because, the APPROACH TO SOLVING THE PROBLEM may not be correct.  If the CORRECT PROCEDURE is written in a gold plate and is buried in the South Pole, all the researchers appear to have been digging the soil in the North Pole. This way, they can never find even after a century - the result can be chaotic and disastrous.   In spite of being a non-medical research scientist, I have found the correct procedure for a total prevention and complete cure of the problem – Type-2 Diabetes, in particular.  Of course, my procedure is bound to be VERY HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL - essentially because of its deviation from prevailing norm. I can very easily do identical kind research work similar to all other researchers, and come up with identical kind of answers, and say that  one should do exercises, avoid sugar consumption, and reduce obesity. This would then CONFORM to what has already been found by a million scientists around the world. Yet, it would never yield any beneficial result, except that I will not be criticised!  Is that my purpose?   I am not expecting a promotion in my workplace, and therefore, I do not need to be scared of criticisms.  I am objective-oriented.   I feel the purpose of my existence is to save mankind at this juncture. God has given me the knowledge. A workable approach will certainly be unique, unusual, abnormal, and will NOT conform to the non-working approaches that are being repeatedly said by others.  ************ Gunther S. Stent from University of California in Berkeley calls my kind of report as “PREMATURE DISCOVERY”. He, along with his colleague Barber, emphasizes in their paper that discoveries that were not consistent with the accepted knowledge at the time or not verifiable technologically would experience the delayed phenomenon. “delayed recognition papers are those that are initially unappreciated or unused but are later recognized as significant”  Dr. Eugene Garfield, Founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), who was a pioneer in the field of citation analysis, and whose data bases have now become the online research tool of the “Web of Knowledge” (Infoplease, 2007), writes:  “Recognition is one of the most valued rewards of science. It often is confirmed exclusively on the individual or team responsible for a particular breakthrough. “These fortunate few certainly deserve the media attention and awards that come with the success of discovery.” “It is almost impossible to identify useful, important, yet unrecognized papers by any but highly subjective evaluation, but we can recognize a special class of undervalued papers – those that were recognized long after they were published. Such papers represent DELAYED RECOGNITION and sometimes are associated with PREMATURE DISCOVERY.”  “… PREMATURE DISCOVERY IS A SUBJECT OF DELAYED RECOGNITION. “A definition, according to Stent, is that the discovery “was not appreciated in its day. “This can occur when the contemporaneous knowledge, technology, and social issues prevent the discovery from being extended experimentally or applied to other related scientific efforts.”  Garfield adds on: According to William Goffman in Cleveland’s Case Western Reserve University and Kenneth S. Warren of the Rockefeller Foundation in New York, “…A strong presumption prevails that any evidence that contradicts the accepted view is invalid and must be disregarded…” It seems, Barber had well defined in 1961 itself about the topic of resistance by scientists to new discoveries (especially those that challenge commonly held percepts). Likewise, if one does not follow the well-ploughed path of presentation of his/her discoveries, the chances of those findings getting totally ignored appear to be great. The fact that a particular research is done in a deviated manner from the so-called ‘norm’, should, by right, be considered to show the extra capabilities and exceptional talent of the researcher. Again, Eugene Garfield’s (1989) another thought-provoking article entitled “The Process of Scientific Discovery” has brought to recognition my kind of approach.   If all of MY discoveries published in 1998 (and subsequent years) in the form of a books with proper ISBN reference and the like) is considered to constitute 100%, recent scientists from different parts of the world have been publishing these days bits and pieces of my findings (amounting to 5 or 6 percent of my works) as if theirs is the first-time report (may not form plagiarisms), simply because they have not seen my publications – for want of adequate citations and publicity, especially because I do not belong to the mainstream medical fraternity. Thus, my findings tend, erroneously, to form one of the multiple discoveries. I have been trying for the past 41 years, through multivariate means, to get my findings recognized. None of them brought me any success.  Could you, if you have any authority,  kindly evaluate my works, and do the needful to bring them to recognition soon, so that the suffering millions worldwide can be saved from nearly all of the diseases, thus making their life on earth more pleasant, contributive and meaningful.  ********** THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION, or any Health Ministry in any of the countries, must come forward to recognise my findings.    FOR THAT MATTER, EVEN OUR MALAYSIAN HEALTH MINISTER  Dato Sri Dr. S. Subramaniam, and/or his Deputy Dato Seri Dr.Hilmi Yahaya, who support any alternative medicine if it can help the people rid of their health problems, could invite me to implement my findings in one of our well-established and most modern hospitals in Kuala Lumpur / Selangor (Such as the Selayang Hospital),  I will do the needful, demonstrate excellent and highly disciplined scientific procedure and show positive results within a short time span of even TWO MONTHS, incurring insignificant expenditure. ******** Well friends, I look forward to some magical changes to occur this year. With best wishes, Dr. Palani, Ph.D.