FRUIT JUICES CAN GIVE RISE TO OBESITY AND COLON CANCER

FRUIT JUICES CAN

GIVE RISE TO OBESITY

AND COLON CANCER

(© 28 May 2015: Dr.V.M.Palaniappan, Ph.D.)
 

A man, aged 35, and weighing 96 kg came to me last week.

Losing weight was his main concern.

In the course of describing his problems, he proudly claimed that he had started drinking ‘plenty’ of fruit juices daily since a month.

When verified, he said his body weight has been increasing as usual, and there was no loss of any kind.

One ‘benefit’ he had noticed was related to his toileting habit. It seems, defecating has been a lot easier nowadays, and he even evacuates twice or thrice daily.

I told him to stop drinking the juices with effect from that moment.

He could of course eat them, rather than making them into juices to drink.

Do you know why I suggested that to him?

You should be wondering as what exactly could go wrong if one drinks the juices! After all, both of them are same.

Let me explain to you the dangers you could invite by drinking the juices.

The explanation would come to you as a shock, for you wouldn’t have even dreamt of such a thing from happening!

Yes: Drinking fruit juices can increase your BODY WEIGHT. 

In addition, a regular intake for a long time, say, about five years, can give you COLON CANCER as well.

To get convinced, please read the following evidences:

I am not referring to the sucrose or calories contained in the fruit juices at all!  (In other words, these do NOT increase the body weight of a person.)

It is some other important, hitherto not-understood phenomenon.

*  *  *  *  *  *

I am sure most of you know that some 70 to 80% of the CALCIUM contained in the vegetables we eat are NOT absorbed by the intestinal tract, and are sent out of the body as part of the faces we defecate.

Why do you think this happens?

Is it because the intestinal tract has LESSER ability to absorb?

No, it is not because of that!

The following is the reality:

*  *  *  *  *  *

Calcium is a most wanted substance for the children’s wellbeing.

This is so because their bones, teeth, nail and nearly all parts of their body require RAPID growth and development.

They have to grow rapidly to attain adult’s physique by the time they reach 18, 20, or so. 

Whereas the already-grown up adults require only about HALF of the children’s requirement.  

Thus, men and menopausal women require only about 450 to 500 mg of Calcium DAILY, for our well-being. (This is enough, for the bones are not going to grow any longer, nor any new teeth is going to form.) 

Menstruating women, since a substantial quantity of calcium gets lost in the menstrual fluid, do require about 50 mg more than men or the menopausal people. 

*  *  *  *  *  *

There is almost no food that does not contain calcium.

Normally, ALL food of SEA origin (e.g., anchovies / Ikan Bilis, crabs, prawns, fish, shellfish, etc.) contain ABUNDANT Calcium. (The coral reef, shells, etc. are made of just calcium!)

ALL plants contain calcium – some contain plenty of it, some mediocre, and some others, little. 

All FRUITS contain ABUNDANT Calcium in them.  

So, if we make a SOUP of ANY vegetable, THAT soup will have ALL the calcium present in the vegetable we have boiled. 

In other words, SOUPs form RICH SOURCE of Calcium.

That is why it tastes very delicious (with salt added, of course) 

Such calcium-rich soup is very good for those who are very thin, under-nourished, recovering from illness, etc. 

However, if healthy people drink soups, say about thrice a week or so, and that should help their body maintain its calcium requirement.  

(I have often found in Malaysian Chinese men drinking about 14 soups a week – twice daily, developing Prostate Enlargement – which is due to the absorption of far too much of calcium by the cells that make the Prostate Gland, that are designed to scavenge calcium for the production of semen).

*  *  *  *  *  *

The same things goes for FRUIT JUICES as well. 

Such great abundance is what makes them taste sweet, similar to the sugarcanes (Palaniappan, V.M., Diabetes: Causes, Cure and Prevention: ISBN978-967-9988-15-4. 255pp)

So, if we are going to eat a portion of a fruit, that would help us maintain the slight alkalinity that is required for keeping body in a healthy state (at pH 7.3 or 7.4).  

If we eat TOO MUCH of the fruit, that will put into our body also too much of the calcium.

In reality, what happens is, if we start eating a fruit, after eating some of it, our brain creates a sense of SATISFACTION, and we tend to stop eating any further. If we force-eat more, we tend to develop a sense of ‘hatred’ for the same, or may even make us vomit, and that makes us stop any further consumption.   

On the other hand, if we make a concentrated juice of the fruit, and further enhance it to make it tastier, we may end up drinking too much of it. This way, too much of calcium would enter into our body. 

If and when calcium enters into our intestinal tract in a water-soluble state, it will get readily absorbed, and that will end up being too much for the body to withstand. 

*  *  *  *  *  *

EXCESSIVE FIBRE CONTENTS or ANY ACIDS (Papaya or any ripe fruit turns acid due to the fermentation bacteria at the colon) are bound to make the faces SLIMY or WATERY and SHAPELESS. 

When this happens, ALL the LOCKED-UP Calcium in the faeces that was scheduled to go out of the body, NOW, GETS ABSORBED by the lining cells (the Adenomatous or Glandular Cells) in the COLON.

*  *  *  *  *  *

In the process of eating food, we CANNOT keep track of the quantity of calcium that enters into the body. 

Until about a century ago, we never knew the quantity of calcium our body required.  

We also did not know which food had how much of calcium in it. 

Yet, people ate food, just guided by their INTUITION. They ate if they liked a food, and if that was available to them. 

This is what has been happening when it comes to the feeding habits of ALL animals, even today. 

When they (=humans and animals) did so, they could have INADVERTENTLY, consumed abundant CALCIUM. 

Too much of Calcium, similar to too much of any other substance, can harm the well-being of the body. 

So, God, or Nature, has created a built-in mechanism in the body, in the following manner:

*  *  *  *  *  *

The brain will keep track of what has been going into the body. On finding that ADEQUATE Calcium has already been absorbed, it rejects all the EXCESSES, by leaving it unabsorbed, and thus allowing it to be thrown away in the faecal matter. 

This is precisely why some 70 or 80% of the Calcium present in the vegetable matter is left unabsorbed.  

(The water-soluble calcium excesses would get thrown out of the body through urinations.)

*  *  *  *  *  *

All water-insoluble calcium – such as those ‘locked-up’ in the vegetable matter get removed from the body along with the faeces.  

The faeces, when it contains calcium, will be in an ALKALINE state. Alkaline faeces will form SOLID matter. So, when we defecate, the faces will be SHAPELY, and NOT slimy or watery. 

In other words, SOLID and SHAPELY faeces takes with it all the unwanted excessive calcium away from our body, leaving our body in a healthy state.

*  *  *  *  *  *

All vegetable matter contain FIBRE in them.

Some of them contain lesser quantities of fibre.

Some contain mediocre, and some others contain plenty.

These fibres, help in the process of defecation – they help in the gentle ‘escape’ of the faecal matter from the rectum.

This gives us comfort and satisfaction of having evacuated the waste.

*  *  *  *  *  *

Let us do an experiment:

Take any fruit, apple, orange or papaya, or any other.

‘Grind’ it in a blender or a juicer.

Leave it overnight.

It would froth, ferment, turn acid and taste sour.

This happens because of some air-borne FERMENTATION bacteria grows profusely in it, ‘eats’ it, and releases ACID ‘urine’ as the end-product.

Thus, the juice turns ACIDIC. 

When the faeces becomes acidic, it will become slimy or watery and would lose its shape – that will release the hither-to locked-up calcium.

This will then get absorbed by the colon – as was described above.

*******

Likewise, if we consume EXCESSIVE FIBRE, it would make the faeces SLIMY and WATERY, and turns the faces acidic.  

*  *  *  *  *  *

The above being the truth, how can dieticians  make you consume EXTRA and EXCESSIVE CALCIUM, by (a) enriching eatables with extra calcium – as is being done in biscuits, oats, beverages, powdered milk preparations, etc., (b) tell you take calcium supplements in the form of tablets and dairy products? 

This they do believing that if something is good, too much of it should be excellent!

If you forcibly introduce excessive calcium into your body, and compel the body to contain it, for sure, things are bound to go wrong!

*  *  *  *  *  *

NOW, LET US SEE WHAT CAN HAPPEN IF YOU TOOK TOO MUCH OF CALCIUM.

OR, WHAT HAPPENS TO THE EXCESSIVE CALCIUM THAT HAD ENTERED INTO THE BODY: 

*  *  *  *  *  * 

If we expose our body to plenty of sunshine (as it happens in the case of a Farmer who does agriculture), the calcium excesses would get FIXED in his skeletal system.

This will happen because his body would produce Vitamin-D with the help of sunshine. He would start weighing heavier and develop a well-built and huge body, and that may NOT giving him any significant disease. 

On the other hand, if the person happens to be living indoors all the time, as most of the office-going people do, then, the following would happen: 

In the absence of Vitamin-D, the FREE, water-soluble Calcium would enter into the cells to become part of the cytoplasm.  

Continuous entry would enlarge the cells. 

Cells that make up the SOFT TISSUES (of organs) in the entire body would keep on receiving and accumulating such free calcium, and this would then MAKE ALL THE CELLS BIGGER IN SIZE AND HEAVIER IN WEIGHT.

As a result, the person body would become MUCH BIG SIZED, and OVERWEIGHT.

Continued process would make the person OBESE.

Naturally, ALL the obesity-related diseases would subsequently accompany.

*  *  *  *  *  *

When all the cells in ONE SPOT (e.g., breast) get enlarged, it will form a lump.

Further and continued absorption of such free calcium excess would swell up the lump more and more, until it becomes a hard and rocky ‘stone’, which would then become a CANCER. 

*  *  *  *  *  *

If such calcium absorption occurs in the cells of the tissues of the COLON for a prolonged time, then, it would become COLON CANCER. 

Although I don’t have the exact statistics, I have observed clinically, that some five years of continued defecation of SLIMY faeces by those who are Diabetic, tends to give rise to COLON CANCER in them. 

(Those patients were found to be eating ripe Papaya fruit all the time, with the assumption that Papaya is good for the Diabetic people, for it enhances ‘easy’ defecation). 

To sum up, if a person defecates slimy faeces for most part of the time for ANY REASON, he appears to be developing COLON CANCER for CERTAIN. 

Therefore, EATING moderate quantities of three-quarter ripe (not over-ripe) fruits appear to be good for people. 

Eating over-ripe fruits, eating too much of fruits, or drinking fruit juices should be considered improper lifestyle habits. 

I have observed that Malaysian Indians tend to eat over-ripe fruits all the time, and Malaysian Chinese consume less ripe fruits. These habits may explain to some extent the incidence of colon cancer occurrences among these two communities in particular. 

(At this point, needless to repeat that consuming EXTREMELY HIGH FIRBRE containing substances, whether natural or synthetic,  should also be avoided as far as possible.)

*  *  *  *  *  *

I have described all the above with proper explanations and evidences in my books:

Palaniappan, V.M., 1998. Obesity: Causes, Cure and Prevention; ISBN 978-967-9988-05-8.471pp; 

Palaniappan, V.M. 2010. Cancer: Causes, Cure and Prevention. ISBN978-967-9988-14-7.620pp;

Palaniappan, V.M., 2011: Diabetes: Causes, Cure and Prevention: ISBN978-967-9988-15-4. 255pp;  

Palaniappan,V.M. (2013). All About Obesity In a Nutshell. ISBN978-967-9988-18-5. 221pp.)

If interested in buying them, you may want to contact my Distributor Mr. Bala of PUMA AGENCY, mobile No.6-012-2075172.

You can ask him for the name of the bookshop selling my books in YOUR place, if it is within Malaysia.

Others from overseas, please contact me for your needs: My e-mail is: vmpalaniappan@gmail.com/   and my MOBILE is: 6-012-2071414.

*  *  *  *  *  *

WELL, FRIENDS: 

Let me share something personal with you at this moment: 

You must be wondering if I have stopped writing articles for our BLOG, especially because I have not written any for the past about two months. 

I have good reasons for this: 

I am very good in my mother-tongue – the Tamil language. 

I have written high-class proses. However, I have not learnt any bit about POETRY writing.  

There is an excellent, definite, and rigid grammar for Tamil Poetry Writing.  

Tamil poetries, when recited, sound melodious, rhythmic and enchanting.  You would love it, even if you do not understand!

I wanted to give a try.  

So, on my own, without a proper Guru, started writing poetry. 

Can you guess what could have been the subject? 

Well, I have so far written about 80 pages of it – It is entitled ‘Diabetes: Causes and Recovery’.  It has come out very well. I was indulging in writing it all the time – day and night, neglecting everything else! (Except that I have been presenting Talk Shows in Tamil on health-care matters in Astro TV Vizhuthugal for more than a year.  Now, the Producer has given me a break).

That is precisely why I have not written any article for our Blog here. 

I am in the process of handing my manuscript to some learned Literary Giant in Malaysia. If it gets approved, the Tamil-reading public can expect that to come out in the form of a book. 

This book, I think, would form something similar to the English poem “The Deserted Village” by Oliver Goldsmith. 

At this, I would like to thank many of you (like Mr. Chong of Bandar Sri Damansara, PJ) for having encouraged me to continue writing articles for our Blog, lest our Followers may start thinking that I have stopped writing altogether…. I hope I can continue for some more time to come….  

Thank you, dear friends for your kind support.

Bye until I come up with my next article, soon.

Dr. Palani.

THE COMMON FACTOR THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBESITY AND BREAST CANCER

(© 22 August 2015: Dr.V.M.Palaniappan, Ph.D.)

Did you read the latest news referring to the common causative factor/s for breast cancer and obesity that was published by Medical Xpress (Aug.20, 2015), cited in Science X Newsletter?

Following is the URL for you to read the full text:

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-08-scientists-probe-obesity-ties-breast.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=ctgr-item&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter

*   *   *   *   *   *

YOU MAY WANT TO READ THIS PART IN THIS ARTICLE FIRST, AND THEN PROCEED TO READ MY RESEARCH FINDINGS / OBSERVATIONS / COMMENTS IN THE SECOND PART, BELOW – Dr.Palani.

*   *   *   *   *   *

The research works of Research Assistant Professor Lisa Arendt and Associate Professor Charlotte Kuperwasser from Tufts University in Boston were published in the Science Translational Medicine (Aug.19^th issue).

They have observed that “The processes underlying the obesity-breast cancer link had left specialists stumped, although some had proposed obesity-related differences in hormones or inflammation. But obesity-related stiffening of breast tissues was not high on the list.”

The authors have referred to another new work in Cornell University by a doctoral student Bo Ri Seo and associates. It seems they examined the breast fat tissues in women and mice, and found that “in obesity, the web-like network of fibres holding fat cells in place is more rigid than normal”

To make it simple, those cells were RIGID.

We may want to ask a question here:

What makes those cells rigid?

The authors have tried to explain it in the following manner:

The “low oxygen in the denser tissues might be one explanation. It's still possible that an inflammatory process plays a role.”

(According to my research findings, both the above do not seem to be correct. I will explain the phenomenon in the later part in this article – Dr.Palani).

Scientists normally believe that mice (or man) can become obese in two ways: one due to genetic reasons, and second due to over-eating.

When these two authors compared the tissues of mice that became obese due to the above two reasons, they found the tissues in both were stiff.

So, they seem to have concluded that the STIFF STRUCTURE is the responsible factor for breast cancer.

They further found that even ‘normal’ cells grown under the ‘cancerous conditions’ also became cancerous – that is rigid.

Their further research showed that loss of weight due reduced feed had softened the rigidity to some extent.  In other words, the rigidity is reversible to some extent.

So, they seem to believe that “weight loss is the only recommendation for obesity in women diagnosed with breast cancer.”

According to Seo and her associates, “Dense breast tissue on a mammogram is associated with a higher probability of developing breast cancer.”

They say that there is a possibility to regenerate breast (getting breast tissue from a donor) after its complete removal through surgery. However, they have raised doubt about the suitability of the donor’s breast tissue – if she too happens to be an obese woman.

The Editorialists have observed the following:

The “diabetic women who take the drug metformin have a lower risk of developing breast cancer”.

Arendt and Kuperwasser seem to have read in some other study that there was no relationship between short-term weight loss and lessening of cancer risk in postmenopausal women.

*   *   *   *   *   *

THE FOLLOWING ARE MY (DR.PALAN’S) FINDINGS:

(For ease of understanding, I am presenting here abrupt statements initially, and later, the explanations.)

1.  Hormones and inflammation do not seem to be the causative factors for the development of breast cancers.
   
   
2. Low oxygen in the denser tissues does not seem to have any relevance to breast cancer at all.
   
   
3.  Obesity-related stiffening of breast tissues (that is, the rigidity), as per my study, does not seem to be the causative factor as such, but is an intermediary transitional phenomenon only.
   
   
4. Ref: Obesity: It may be true that Genetics plays a major role in determining the overall COMMON structure of people belonging to a particular race (or ethnicity), but may not bring about variations within the same population.
   
   
   In other words, if parents and fore-fathers (one individual of a particular race) are of a comparable and more or less identical size and structure, that one individual descendent becoming too HUGE cannot be attributed to the genes. Blaming the genetic mutations too may not be an acceptable explanation. (If genetic mutation, why is it that that one individual does not become too puny at all? Mutations need not be unidirectional.)
   
   
   Further, at all times during the process of evolution, “Natural Selection” or “Survival of Fittest” occurs to choose only the best, not the unfit, worst and destructive. People often tend to forget this reality.
   
   
   So, genetic inheritance cannot be the causative factor for obesity and cancer developments.
   
   
5. Ref: OVER-EATING and OBESITY:
   Based on my 40 years of research in the area of “Ecological Healing System”, or “EcoTherapy” for short, I have found the following to be true*:
   
   
   (* Ref: Palaniappan,V.M., (1998). Obesity: causes, cure, and prevention. ISBN 978-967-9988-05-8. 471pp.
   Palaniappan, V.M. (2007). The true causes of all diseases. ISBN 978-967-9988-13-0.192pp.
   Palaniappan, V.M. (20??). All about obesity in a nutshell. ISBN 978-967-9988-18-5. 220pp.)
   
   
   There are TWO different types of OBESITY:
   
   

1.  HARMLESS OBESITY:
   
   
   The body size of a person becoming too big, with flabby, ‘hanging’ kind of flesh over the face, around the waist, in buttocks, thighs, and the like.
   
   
   This kind of obesity occurs essentially due to the FAT CELLS that make up the ADIPOSE TISSUE.
   
   
   The FATTY TISSUE occurs as a result of FAT ACCUMULATION, because of eating too much of fats, oils and carbohydrates, or because of NOT burning off that excessive food as energy through working (or exercising).
   
   
   This kind of obesity does NOT do any harm to the person, except making the person look ‘out-of-shape’ and somewhat clumsy and lazy. That will be all to it.
   
   
   This fat tissue related obesity as such does not give rise to MORBID OBESITY – for certain. Fat tissue is nothing more than stored energy.
   
   
   In other words, this kind of obese person will not get diabetes, heart diseases, stone diseases, cancers, etc.
   
   
   This kind of obesity ALONE (overweight + clumsy-looking shape) can be reversed easily either by STARVATION or REDUCING THE FOOD (fats, oils, and carbohydrates) OR BY BURNING THE FAT (that is, spending the stored energy through over-working or exercising).
   
   
2. HARMFUL OBESITY:
   
   
   Even before trying to understand the HARMFUL obesity, we have to remember the following:
   
   
   When we consume FOOD (solid or liquid), it gives us the following:
   
   

1.  Energy for work (this is the one that gets saved as FAT cells, if not spent then and there).
   
   
2. Vitamins: these are just catalyst-like helpers for our well-being.
   
   
3. MINERALS.
   
   
   To start with all plants absorb several minerals (Ca, Mg, K, Na, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, etc.) from soil.
   
   
   Of all these, the most important mineral that gets into the plant body in great quantities is CALCIUM (Ca).
   
   
   This abundant Ca gets into the body of man (and all animals) through food (solids and liquids).
   
   
   Man requires about 500 mg (adults) to 1000 mg (children) of Ca daily for a variety of purposes, we know very well.
   
   
   However, we are bound to consume MORE or less Ca, inadvertently.
   
   
   In reality, it has been well studied by numerous scientists that no major disaster happens if the amount absorbed is LESS (See my book on obesity: page:   ).
   
   
   If MORE Ca gets CONSUMED, then, the body already has TWO built-in mechanisms to get rid of those Ca EXCESSES:
   
   

1.  The intestine purposely avoids absorbing the water-insoluble Ca from vegetable matter, and rejects such excesses through defecation.
   
   
   (The faeces, when it contains Ca, will be alkaline and in solid form.)
   
   
2.  All water-soluble Ca EXCESSES will be driven out of the blood stream (helped by Calcitonin, secreted by the Thyroid gland) and body through URINE.

With the help of the above TWO mechanisms, ALL Ca EXCESSES get out of the body, leaving it in a healthy state.

SERIOUS PROBLEM arises only when MAN (and some domesticated animals, but not wild ones) DISTURBS ONE OR BOTH OF THE ABOVE TWO ‘NATURAL’ FUNCTIONS.

1. If and when a person eats chocolates, biscuits, pastries made of ultra-refined flour, over-ripe fruits (such as papaya that may contain far too much of fibres), etc., the faeces becomes SLIMY (a bit watery, normally recognised as diarrhoea).
   
   
   At this, the faeces turns ACIDIC.
   
   
   When this happens, the HITHERTO UNABSORBED Ca EXCESSES in the colo-rectal region, GETS ABSORBED BY THE LARGE INTESTINE.
   
   
   This process ADDS on to the Ca OVERLOAD.
   
   
   This overloaded, now-water-soluble Ca excesses become part of the URINE so that it get VOIDED out of the body.
   
   
   If the person URINATES ADEQUATELY (I have studied the adequacy to be 7 or more number of times a day, and the optimum appear to be 8 urinations, so that the Liquid Input / Urine Output Ratio remains between 1.0 and 1.2.  See Palaniappan, 1998, 20?? for procedure), ALL the Ca EXCESSES get leached out from the body, leaving it in a healthy state.
   
   
   The problem arises only if the person UNDER-URINATES.
   
   
   If for instance, if the person urinates only 3 or 4 times daily, this inadequacy leaves behind* in the body about HALF of the Ca EXCESSES.
   
   
   (* Water can remove Ca only to its maximum saturation point.)
   
   
   So, the Ca EXCESSES (that became EXCESSES because of consuming too much Ca in the first place, making the faeces slimy subsequently, and under-urinating eventually), REMAINS INSIDE THE BODY.
   
   
   Now, the Calcitonin will NOT allow these Ca EXCESSES to remain in the blood.
   
   
   As a result, such EXCESSES get TRANSPORTED by the LYMPH fluid to various parts of the body for STORAGE.
   
   
   The SOFT CELLS in various parts of the body form the best STOREHOUSES.
   
   
   The cells that make up the soft tissues in the BREAST (as well as soft cells in all other organs in the body, e.g., any part of the gastro-intestinal system, bladder, PROSTATE GLAND, etc., etc.) absorb these Ca EXCESSES*, into their cytoplasm, to form part of it. The Ca excesses get converted into WATER-INSOLUBLE, SOLID CALCIUM OXALATE CRYSTALS.
   
   
   (* The soft cells that make up the LACTICIFEROUS tissues in the breasts are designed to scavenge and absorb Ca from all available sources in order to produce MILK for feeding the baby.
   
   
   In men, the soft cells that make up the PROSTATE GLAND are also designed to absorb Ca from all available sources, essentially from the LYMPH DUCTS, for the production of SEMEN.
   
   
   When such accumulations go beyond the optimum, or the tolerance limits of those cells, those cells DIVIDE mechanically – that is asexually – mitotically, just to accommodate more of the oncoming Ca EXCESSES.
   
   
   Naturally, such cell divisions result in the formation numerous cells – all at ONE SPOT. For want of space, all those over-loaded, over-inflated, over-filled, over-stuffed cells jointly take up the shape of a LUMP* – the Breast LUMP**.
   
   
   (* Often, the Oncologists tend to recognise this enlargements as inflammation, as stated at the beginning of this article.)
   
   
   (** In the case of the Prostate Gland, such an accumulation results in its ENLARGEMENT.)
   
   
   These Calcium oxalate CRYSTALS are the ones that make the breast cells (tissues) HARD or RIGID, as was found by Lisa Arendt and Charlotte Kuperwasser of Tufts University in Boston, in the Reported study.
   
   
   If and when a person continues to:
   
   

1. consume Ca-rich food (such as seafood, eggs, Ca supplements, Ca-enriched eatables and drinks, etc.,),
2. defecate slimy faeces all the time (or, frequently), and 
3. if he/she under-urinates all the time, then, as per my study, it is almost certain, that these ‘inflammations’, the ‘lumps’, the  ‘enlargements’, or the ‘cysts’ keep on growing in size, until these so-called ‘cancer-structures’ attain much bigger sizes to a point of SQUEEZING other organs and preventing them from performing their normal functions.  
   Of course, this will ultimately result in death.

The following are very important points we have to remember:

• When ALL the soft cells in the body gather and retain the Calcium oxalate crystals (tiny stones), that INCREASES the total body weight of the person - resulting in OVERWEIGHT, and subsequently, morbidly OBESE. In other words, it is the ACCUMULATION OF Ca EXCESSES that forms the COMMON FACTOR that contributes to BOTH the development of OBESITY as well as the CANCER.
• Cancer Cell is NOT an organism on its own. It is just a normal cell that has become inflated due to the filling of excessive Calcium. Therefore, it does not spread from one organ to another, as has been misunderstood all this while. It only divides at one spot.
• When the accumulation of Ca Excesses continue in a person, the most vulnerable organ (the breast, uterus, cervix, etc. in women, and prostate gland, colon, etc. in men) begins to accumulate such excesses initially.
  
  
  Once that particular organ gets fully filled, then, other adjacent organ (i.e., their cells) begins the accumulation process.
  
  
  Later on, yet another organ continues to absorb and enlarge.
  
  
  Unfortunately, scientists hitherto appear to have mistaken this to be a ‘SPREADING ACTION’ of some kind of ‘organism’ called ‘a Cancer Cell’.
  
  
  The above being the case, treating a cancer patient with CHEMOTHERAPY or RADIATION does NOT serve any meaningful purpose, other than weakening the patient by the toxins contained in the chemicals such as Tamoxifen.
  
  
  One may want to query as how does some amount of good result happens when a patient is subjected to chemotherapy and/or radiation>
  
  
  Here is the answer:
  
  
  The chemicals used are strong ACIDS. Even otherwise, any concentrated chemical put into the body makes the body HYPERACIDOSED.
  
  
  Likewise, the RADIATION makes the body very highly HYPERACIDOSED.
  
  
  In acid state, the on-coming (i.e., the new input) ALKALINE Calcium EXCESS that is in the process of getting accumulated within the cells, will NOT accumulate, but will get NEUTRALISED. As a result, the cells will not get bloated up or inflamed, or form a new lump. Thereby, there will not be any new cell division occurring for a while.  HOWEVER, after a while, when the body returns to a mildly ALKALINE state, the cells will start accumulating the freshly on-coming Ca EXCESSES. This is the IRONY.
  
  
  I have found that the presence or absence of Oxygen has absolutely nothing to do with cancer.
  
  
  Since wild animals do not control their urinal urges, and do not consume any ultra-refined feed, they do not develop any cancers, or even diabetes, for that matter.
  
  
  On the other hand, domesticated animals tend to lessen their urine output, for they, most of the time, tend to depend upon their human masters for drinking water. Even the feed given to them may make their defecations slimy (in cows and dogs, for example).
  
  
  Earlier in this article, I talked of Harmless Obesity due to overeating, and Harmful Obesity due to the accumulation of EXCESSIVE CALCIUM.
  
  
  For someone to find a food that does NOT have any Ca in it is impossible. All food items contain Ca: some have plenty, while others may have lesser quantities.
  
  
  Similar to the proverbial saying that several droplets of rain can result in flooding, when one consumes TOO MUCH (in bulk) of any food, that food is bound to contribute plenty of Ca, essentially owing to the abundance of the food itself. This is the reason why and how the researchers of the above Report found rigid tissues in overfed mice (described above).
  
  
  Let me explain the case of post-menopausal women.
  
  
  The Editorialists mentioned above had said that the following: The “diabetic women who take the drug metformin have a lower risk of developing breast cancer”.
  
  
  It is true that the Diabetic women may not develop cancer. I have elaborated the reason for this in my book (Palaniappan, V.M. (2010). Cancer: Causes, Cure and Prevention. ISBN 978-967-9988-14-7. 621pp.)
  
  
  Can you guess why and how this happens? Let me explain it:
  
  
  I have established that the Type-2 diabetes occurs in a person when he/she drinks plenty of water, but under-urinates (See: Palaniappan, V.M. (2011). Diabetes: Causes, Cure and Prevention” ISBN 978-967-9988-14-7. 256pp.).
  
  
  I have found that it is Ca that behaves like sugar, and when Ca accumulates in a person due to under-urination, the Ca excesses give rise to type-2 diabetes.
  
  
  This happens because, the brain does not want the body to collapse (or severely malfunction) because of the Ca excesses. Therefore, in order to save the body, it force-induces liberal urination – in other words, diabetes develops.
  
  
  At monthly intervals, women tend to lose large quantities of Ca through their menstrual fluids (see my book: Menses, Menopause, and Osteoporosis).
  
  
  Once their menstrual discharges stop because of the menopause, their body begins to accumulate Ca. This makes their body weight increase month after month.
  
  
  When  their body has accumulated far too much of Ca, they develop Type-2 diabetes (or, they get massive heart attack, due to calcium-created heart blockages).
  
  
  Once a post-menopausal woman develops type-2 diabetes, she is going to urinate liberally and at frequent intervals. This would REMOVE ALL THE ACCUMULATE Ca EXCESSES FROM HER BODY.
  
  
  The absence of such Ca accumulation would naturally NOT give rise to cancerous lumps in her.
  
  
  *   *   *   *   *   *
  After reading all the above, you may want to know as how I CURE cancers and diabetes in people.
  
  
  Let me explain here in brief only the mode of treatment for Cancers, since this article deals with cancer.
  
  
  I am of the firm opinion, based on my 40 years of intense research and clinical practice, that ALL CANCERS (INCLUDING LEUKAEMIA) ARE CAUSED ONLY BECAUSE OF THE ACCUMULATION OF EXCESSIVE CALCIUM WITHIN THE BODY (Again, see my book on Cancer for evidences).
  
  
  The basic approach rests in the DECALCIFICATION OF THE PATIENT.
  
  
  In brief,
  • Ca rich diet (e.g., seafood, eggs, etc.) should be prevented.
  • Ca-enriched eatables and Ca-supplements should be stopped.
  • All eatables (e.g. chocolates, over-ripe papaya, any other very high fibre items, etc.) that may make the faeces SLIMY should be stopped.
  • Water intake must be increased to be between 2 L and 3 L, depending upon the environmental conditions and the size of the person.
  • Urination must be regulated to make sure that the person voids once every hour for a while, and then, once every two hours (while awake) or so.
  • Administration of foods and certain HERBS that are naturally highly ACIDIC are to be given.
  • ALL THE ABOVE SHOULD BE MANAGED IN AN ORDER I HAVE DEVELOPED, AND PRESENTED IN MY BOOK ON CANCER.

The above procedure completely cures a person from early stages of cancer. However, at late stages, the removal of the cancer structures through surgical procedure appears to be a must, prior to the management of the patient following my methodology.

This is so because, the lumps tend to become STONES (i.e., water-insoluble Ca stones) in the tissues. Therefore, they cannot be dissolve by the administration of acid substances. Hence, the need for surgical intervention appears to be a necessity.  However, after that, there is no place for chemotherapy or radiation in the curative procedure I have developed. The patient, whose lifestyle has been once changed, will NOT get back the cancer at any time later in her (or his) life.

                    *   *   *   *   *   *

Well, friends,              

Thank you for reading such a long article.

I hope the top people at the W.H.O would read this with open-mindedness, and would begin to recognise my works in this area, for the benefit of mankind.
With love and affection,

Dr. Palani, Ph.D.