WE CAN CREATE CANCER IN HEALTHY PEOPLE, AND THAT WILL IDENTIFY THE EXACT CAUSES FOR CANCER DEVELOPMENT IN HUMANS.

WE CAN CREATE CANCER IN HEALTHY PEOPLE, AND THAT WILL IDENTIFY THE EXACT CAUSES FOR CANCER DEVELOPMENT IN HUMANS.

(© November, 2013: Dr. V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D.)

I read a news recently in the Press (The Star: Star Metro: Events: p.14, Friday, 18 October, 2013) that said “Breast cancer afflicts men too”.

Even before we can understand the breast cancer problem faced by men, we should, in the first place, know how and why women get it.

Practically the entire medical fraternity is still puzzled not knowing the exact cause that lies behind the formation of breast lumps and cancers*.

(* If that is known, then, all those can be reversed to restore perfect health in the person)

As it is, it appears that the only way to handle it is to dissect the lump or the cancer out from breast, and burning or charring away the healthy adjacent tissues, with the following false belief.

Everybody keeps imagining that the cancer as such is a collective formation of some kind of SPECILAISED cells that are NOT created by God or Nature, but by some UNKNOWN, MYSTERIOUS source - the causative factor.

Does it not sound funny?

Numerous so-called ‘culprits’ are listed as ‘risk factors’ for the development of cancers.

Let me ask this question:

If a healthy person is subjected to all possible risk factors that are listed by researchers, will that woman (or man) develop breast lumps or cancers?   

I do not think this can be achieved, with any number of human volunteers.

It is so because, the so-called risk factors, for most part, in real terms, are NOT the true causative factors for the problem!

I often used to say the following when people ask me question as why the medical fraternity, in spite of spending huge amounts of money, energy, manpower, and the like, is still not able to detect the real cause for cancer.

Let us say that the true cause is written in a copper plate, and is buried in the SOUTH Pole.

The medical fraternity, and all related researchers, will NOT find it for next million years, if they keep on digging the earth in the NORTH pole!

On the other hand, it so happened that I dug just the surface in the South Polar region, and to my luck, perhaps blessed by God, I found the answer!

I am only ONE INDIVIDUAL, as opposed to a million worldwide! 

In this case, does the number matter?

The following is the finding, which I have already been repeatedly telling through all my articles and books.

I pray, some one in the World Health Organisation reads THIS, and reads my books and publications, so that all the sufferers world-wide can be saved from dying of cancers and related miseries.

*   *   *   *   *   *

The following simple experiment would reveal and confirm the truth that lies behind the development of breast and nearly all forms of cancers:

Gather a few human volunteers, willing to die to save humanity*.

Even a small number would do. There can be a total of about 80 people: 40 women and 40 men, all aged between, say, 30 and 50 or so.

Half of them can be in the Control Group, and the other half can be subjected to experimentation.

(* I have voluntarily done some experiment in 1910, developed a benign abdominal tumour in my body, raised it in to a 12.5 c.m. ‘ball’, maintained it as a benign structure, and then had it surgically removed at Selayang Government Hospital in Kuala Lumpur.

I have evidences for all the above – in the form of Hospital Records, and also have an authentic video recording of the surgical procedure.

In due course, at the right time, I will post / publish them.)

Let the all the Volunteers lead a guided ‘healthy’ lifestyle, split them into TWO groups at random, let one be a Control Group, and the other, Experimental.

Subject all members of the Experimental Group alone to the following:

Give them CALCIUM supplementations, in the form of tablets, say 10,000 mg daily*.

(A small addition of Magnesium would do a better job. Yet, never mind about this at this occasion.)

Let them take 2,500 mg of the calcium tablet with breakfast, same with lunch, at teatime, and with dinner again, making up the total of 10 thousand milligrams*.

**********

(*Mother’s milk contains just 20 mg of Calcium, per100 ml.

Cow’s milk has 120 mg.

All eatables contain some amount of calcium. They can range anything from about 5 mg, or so to about 1000 mg, or so.

Often sea food tends to contain plenty of it.

********

Men require about 450 - 500 mg daily; women, about 500 - 550 mg, and children about 900 – 1,000 mg daily.

The little extra for women is to compensate the calcium loss through menstrual fluids, at monthly intervals.

Anything more than the above forms the EXCESS.

Under normal circumstances, the urine, voided about 8 times daily, removes such excesses, and keeps the body in a healthy state.

When people consume MORE of the calcium-containing foods, such as vegetables, the brain controls calcium absorption at the intestinal level, and pushes the excesses out as part of the faecal matter, as ‘locked-up’ unutilsed calcium. 

That is why the faeces is alkaline most of the time.)

********

The Control group should  NOT be given the 10 thousand mg of Calcium.

Apart from the EXTRA Calcium, the Experimental Group should be given a total of only FOUR glasses (1 L) of LIQUIDS daily (e.g., 2 glasses of water + 2 glasses of apple juice and/or orange juices.)

whereas, the Control Group should be given EIGHT glasses (2 L) of ONLY water, and NOT juices of any kind.

The Experimental Group should be regulated to urinate about FOUR times daily, whereas the Control should be urinating EIGHT times daily*.

(* To be more scientific, the water/liquid intake and the urine output can be measured accurately to see the Input/Output Ratio.

It would be about 1.0 to 1.2 or so in the Control Group, whereas, the Ratio would be about 1.5 – 2.0, or so. in the Experimental)

Apart from the above two, viz., glucose and water consumptions, ALL OTHER treatments and variables, whether that be the kind of food eaten, or exposure to pollutants and toxic substances, sleeping hours, and the like SHOULD BE EXACTLY IDENTICAL TO BOTH GROUPS.

*********

Based on my earlier observations, I firmly believe that THE ABOVE experiment WOULD CERTAINLY GIVE RISE TO some form of CANCER to members of the Experimental Group.

Some 80% of the people may get it.

It is quite probable that only an insignificant number of people, which could be just 2 – 5% of the people in the CONTROL GROUP, would get any one of the cancers. 

*******

If such a result comes out of the experiment, it would then become clear that IT IS THE ACCUMULATION OF EXCESSIVE CALCIUM AND GLUCOSE (Carbohydrates for tissue growth – for the growth of the so-called cancer cells) that are the EXACT culprits for giving rise to cancers.

********
At this, one may want to ask another question:

Why is it that the Calcium excesses and Glucose excesses do not form only ONE KIND of cancer in ONE organ?

If the causes are identical, why so many different kinds of cancers?

The following could form the answer:

Calcium and glucose get STORED in SOFT tissues.

Such storing can occur in any organ that has soft tissues.

The breast tissues, by nature, already have Lacticiferous tissues that are designed to scavenge and suck free dissolved calcium and glucose from the LYMPH fluid and blood, in order to synthesize milk to feed the baby.

If THAT calcium and glucose are NOT utilized as it happens in the case of a woman who has not given birth to a baby, then, such excesses stay there in those soft tissues, harden, and turn into lumps initially, and upon increased additions of the two substances, turn cancerous*.

(Endometriosis has the same aetiology) 

Further calcium increases, for want of extra storage spaces, result in the development of cancers in other, nearby or remote organs within the body.

Thus, it should be understood that cancers do NOT spread at all*.

(*The truth is that there is NO such thing as “CANCER CELL”.

Therefore, destroying good tissues from spreading of cancer, with the use of either chemical poisons or radiations, does not appear to make any sense, and it tends to form only some kind of mockery.)
********
Do you know why some women get cancer in the left breast, and some others in the right?

I have the correct answer for it:

The lymph fluid carries the calcium (and possibly the glucose) excesses to the breast regions.

If a woman sleeps for most part of the night (all the time) on her left side, her left breast would receive all the free calcium.

This is so because, the lymph fluid simply flows downward, drawn by the earth’s gravitational pull.

The reverse also is true.

If the woman happens to sleep on her right side all the time, her right breast gets the lump and cancer.

In my clinical practice, I have encountered, countless number of times, this phenomenon to occur.

If you have any doubt, you can pose a question to find the answer from any of the women who has breast lump or cancer.

You will find it as an undeniable truth!

********

When it to comes to the development of cancer in the Prostate Gland in men, again, the prostate gland is designed to scavenge and suck all available water-dissolved, free calcium for the purpose of synthesizing semen.

If a man does NOT ejaculate the semen at regular intervals, and IF HE UNDER-URINATES (thus preventing the removal of the calcium excesses through urinations), and also consumes calcium-rich fruit juices and soups (that are calcium extracts of vegetables or bones, for example), calcium accumulations in the soft tissues that make up the prostate gland can reach to very high levels.

That can then give rise to enlargement of the gland (hypertrophy) initially, and then to cancer (hyperplasia).

********

Prostitutes appear to be getting cervical or vaginal cancer.

Do you know why this happens? 

The semen contains abundant absorbable calcium in it.

When semen is ejaculated into the vagina, the lining there absorbs the calcium rapidly.

Since prostitutes are bound to receive seminal fluids several time daily, and since that process goes on daily for a prolonged period, the excessive calcium absorbed gives rise to vaginal or cervical cancer to them.

********

If the calcium excesses happen to be present in the lymph fluid for prolonged periods, then the person would develop LYMPH cancer*.

(* If a person habitually keeps on eating heavy LATE-NIGHT (say, after 10.00 p.m.) dinners all the time, consisting of either calcium-rich seafood, dairy products or vegetables, due to cessation of the peristalsis action of the intestine, the food tends to STAGNATE at various locations along the intestine until the peristalsis is resumed in the following mornings.)

The calcium contents in such stagnated foods may get into the lymph fluids, and get dried up here and there, thus forming CRUSTS and DRIED-UP DEPOSITS of calcium along the lymph ducts.

These tend to form cancers of the lymph ducts and lymph nodes.

************

If the excessive calcium comes from the stuck-up faecal matter (for a prolonged period) that has turned into slimy acid substance, at the colo-rectal region, then, the person gets COLO-RECTAL CANCER.

**********

Often, HABITAUAL LATE-NIGHT diners tend to get ACID REFLUX. 

This can become worse if their food contains too much of oil (e.g., deep-fried items).

This can happen due to the cessation of peristalsis action during late nights, as well as the sleeping (lying flat) posture of the body.

Using a low-level pillow, or sleeping without a pillow can worsen the problem.

Due to all the above, habitual late-night diners tend to facilitate the absorption of calcium by the glandular cells in the gullet.

That can give cancer in the oesophagus.

******

If excessive calcium-carrying urine gets stagnated all the time / kept habitually in the urinal bladder for prolonged periods, the bladder would get cancer there.

********

If a person (in whom excessive calcium habitually accumulates all the time) exposes his body to excessive SUNSHINE, or if happens to take synthetic vitamin-D orally, he would then develop BONE cancer, for the free calcium excesses would get FIXED in the bone.

If not for it, then the BONE MARROW would get cancer in it.

********

When a person’s gullet (oesophagus) gets damaged / eroded due to acid formation during high fever, for instance, the lining there – the adenomatous cells – tend to secrete thick ALKALINE PHLEGM consisting of calcium there.

This happens in order to soothe and protect the injured lining of the gullet.

Thus, in nature, the body appears to produce slimy calcium-based, phlegm-like substance whenever a wound occurs in any part of the body.

Open wounds do get such white protective secretions – often formed by the death of the white cells that come there to combat  invading infectious microbes.

Somewhat similar to the above phenomenon, if a person injures his lung tissues by smoking, the irritation caused induces the secretion of such a calcium-containing phlegm.

That is why smokers tend to cough and spit phlegm all the time.

If such injuries and irritations are continued for a prolonged period, say, several years, then, the secretion of the phlegm containing abundant calcium becomes regularized.

This calcium may accumulate in the tissues of the lungs and give rise to cancers there – the pulmonary calcifications initially, and then the cancer.

In fact, if a wound happens to persist in any part of the body for a very prolonged period, the same phenomenon occurs and gives rise to cancer there.

*******

If a person sleeps without any pillow, or with low-level pillow whereby the head is rested below the level of the body, then, the free water-dissolved calcium can flow through the LYMPH ducts to the BRAIN, and form BRAIN TUMOUR there initially, and cancer at a later stage.

******

Cancers normally do NOT occur in the muscles of the legs or arms.

The reason for this is that calcium accumulations normally do NOT occur in such locations.

Yet, the rare cancer cases (in this part of the body) should be due to calcium accumulations due to some factor.

May be, the person could be wearing extremely tight briefs all the time, thus enhancing the stagnation of lymph-borne calcium in such regions, and thereby the development cancers there.

IN GENERAL, CANCERS DO NOT OCCUR IN PARTS OF THE BODY WHEREEVER THERE IS NO ROOM FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF CALCIUM.

*********

I HAVE GIVEN A COMPLETE PICTURE OF THE ENTIRE THING IN MY BOOK ENTITLED ‘THE TRUE CAUSES OF ALL DISEASES”.

I will soon put it up this as an e-book in the Internet, either in my Website, or as an Amazon.com book.

********
Dear Friends,

The above information is based on my 38 years of research in the area of Ecological Healing System - a Scientific, Evidence-based Alternative medicine I have discovered.

The information I have presented here is completely NEW to the world.

This has not been told by anybody, in any part of the world, in any language, and at any time!

**********
In the meantime,

I beg all of you as my dear friends, to:

(a)  Keep an eye on people who are going to steal my knowledge by way of plagiarism. 

Often, such ‘thieves’ tend to publish their papers as if it is their own original discovery/ findings., watch other researchers publishing this information (my findings) in bits and pieces here and there,

(b)  When you find such publications, may I request you to LET THOSE PUBLISHERS / AUTHORS KNOW THAT DR. PALANI HAS ALREADY PUBLISHED EXACTLY THE SAME INFORMATION MUCH EARLIER, and,

(c) Also inform me that such a publication has come out, so that I too can correct them on the reality of things.

(This kind of activities are bound to happen in the near (or far) future, for ALL I HAVE REPORTED ARE THE TRUTH – undeniable truth, and therefore, anyone in the process of researching is bound to get identical results.

Some of them could be really unaware of my publications. Yet, I deserve the status of being the FOUNDER of these facts – Thanks to you).

My e-mail ID is: vmpalani@streamyx.com

Dear Friends,

If you have any opinion or comments, please send them to me. I will be happy and thankful to you, and would post them in our Blog here

With best wishes and thanks,

Dr.Palani, Ph.D.

.

  

      

REGULAR AND SATISFACTORY SEX RELATIONS CAN POSTPONE MENOPAUSE AND PROLONG THE LIFESPAN OF WOMEN, BESIDES KEEPING THEM YOUNG AND BEAUTIFUL

REGULAR AND SATISFACTORY SEX RELATIONS CAN POSTPONE MENOPAUSE AND PROLONG THE LIFESPAN OF WOMEN, BESIDES KEEPING THEM YOUNG AND BEAUTIFUL

©  25 May 2013: Dr.V.M.Palaniappan

Do you know the techniques of keeping a rose bush or a jasmine plant alive almost permanently in a fertile state?

Those who have done some gardening may know it. 

Let us see what happens to it: 

A rose plant would grow, give out several branches, and develop flower buds at each of the tip end. 

These will blossom and whither off.

After that, the branch gradually dies off. 

When all the branches of a plant have borne flowers, the entire plant dies off. 

This happens because the purpose of reproduction assigned to the plant by Nature has already been achieved.

 Further existence of plant is redundant, and therefore all symptoms of old age including shrinkage and weathering occur, and the whole plant totally dies off soon. 

If we wish to keep the rose plant alive and in an active, healthy and flowering stage, we have to regularly prune the branches, immediately after flowering. 

We should not wait until the arrival of the `die-back' situation. 

This way, the plant will continue to thrive for a prolonged period. 

Flowering too will continue almost non-stop, for numerous years. 

* * * * * * * * 
Human body too behaves exactly the same way. 

A man having regular sex will keep youthful even in his sixties, seventies and eighties. 

One who does not have sex at all (not even masturbation) would soon recognise an initial thickening of his seminal fluid, which would then get reduced in quantity, and may even stop altogether if the 'idle' situation prolongs. 

He would soon develop wrinkles and shrinkage, and would look as if he has been `beaten-up' in life.

A woman will be fertile only if she continues to have menstruation, shortly called menses. 

With the cessation of such a menses, her capacity to reproduce also stops. 

Although a man can continue to use her as an 'object' to have sex, her potential as a reproducible female would have come to an end. 

If Nature's purpose of creating a female to reproduce with a view to keep up the progeny on this earth, then her existence after development of menopause becomes redundant or meaningless. 

So, Nature always tries to keep up the fertility status of a female as long as it could. 

But, for some reason if such a status is not kept up, then sterility sets in, together with all other symptoms of old age.

The idea of Nature is to get rid of the `useless' female body from a state of living. 

This necessitates the removal of the unnecessary 'burden' from earth so as to let other 'fertile' 'organisms' 'utilse' all the 'available' natural resources.

So, withering occurs, and death soon follows - the woman becomes too old at a drastic speed, gets a 'massive heart attack' or something of that kind that would bring an end to her living.

Her  body would then turn into 'organic manure' (along with time) if buried, or ashes (minarals, such as calcium, magnesium, sodium, etc.) if cremated.

These would then directly or indirectly enter into the bodies of the future generations.

Thus, the earth's dynamism keeps going endlessely!

God appears to have made the entire phenomenon 'self-sustaining'.

* * * * * * * * * *

In other words, if a female wants to live with all characteristics that denote youthfulness, she has to maintain her potential for reproduction. 

She must continue to be fertile. 

This means, she must continue to have her monthly menstruations without any change in its pattern. 

A change in the pattern of menses tends to indicate that menopause is about to set in. 

So, the latter should not happen. 

Thus, a female will retain all her youthfulness as long as she continues to menstruate. 

Undoubtedly a lot of women tend to consider the monthly occurrence as a nuisance, and menopause gives them some kind of relief, when menses totally stops.

Let us see why all these happen. 

In the first place, why should a female get discarded by Nature as a useless individual? 

The following explanation will enlighten us well:

Even before we could analyse the reason behind the setting-in of menopause, let us see how and when women develop menopause.

Without offending any religion, let us just see the logic of the occurrence only for the purpose of understanding the phenomenon of fertility in relation to bodily function and mental status:

The nuns in a church, who are spinsters (virgins), are trained to be devoted in the practice of religion. 

These nuns do not even think of men and sex. 

If the thought of man comes to their mind, they instantly pray to God and get rid of such desires. 

To help promote the thoughts of God, and to suppress the sex-related desires, such women, called Sanyasinis in the practice of Hiduism, even eat bland diets, without salt and spices. 

They succeed very well in their attempts.

In these women, the bodily hormone secretions that are related to sex and reproduction would gradually decrease, and would soon cease altogether. 

(The rule in human existence appears to be this: Any organ or any part of the body that has been left totally unused for prolonged period, will become vestigeal.)

Such secretions become redundant in them.  This stage is very soon followed by menopause. 

Thus, a female who does not use her body and mind for reproduction loses her status as a `useful' individual on this earth, as far as it concerns the upkeep of the progeny. 

This way, the nuns and Sanyasinis tend to develop menopause at an early  age. 

For girls who started off as nuns or Sanyasinis at a relatively young age, it may occur even in their early 30's.

* * * * * * * *
Let us now consider some women who are not married for a long time after attaining puberty. 

The reason for such a delay does not matter much for our evaluation here.

All that matters is that she is a virgin, but she has ample desires and longings to get married or to have sex. 

In these females, the sex-related hormones do secrete to some extent. 

However, since the actual mating has not taken place for a prolonged period of time, the reproduction-related functions in the body slowly decline and get withdrawn. 

These too soon promote the setting in of menopause.

However, these females tend to develop it only in their late thirties or early forties.

The third type includes women who are married, but for some reason have sex with their husbands only occasionally:

Their sex related activities are highly irregular. 

A husband who often needs to be away from home may not be able to have sex with his wife regularly. 

This kind of women tend to develop their menopause in their mid-forties.

The fourth category of women who have regular sex with their husbands, but yet do not get any orgasm, tend to develop their menopause in their late forties.

The fifth but small number of women who experience orgasm most of the time they have sex with their husbands, and have regular and frequent sex, will develop their menopause only in their late fifties or early sixties. 

If the fifth category of women do not avoid pregnancy, and have regular child birth, then, they will continue to have regular menstruations even until they reach their 70.

The fifth category of women often tend to get very much attached to their husbands, would never disagree with even sex-unrelated matters, and would become their `slaves' for ever, bound of course, by love. 

    The husband who has taken so much of care to make his wife happy and satisfied all the time unfortunately does not get any reward, for this fifth category woman tends to believe that one hundred percent of all the married women do get orgasmic pleasure of the SAME kind every time they have sex with their husbands. 

In other words, such a womsn considers that as a norm for every woman on earth, and there is nothing special about her husband. 

Therefore, she often fails to appreciate the unique contributions of her husband.

This appears to be the only shortcoming in her. 

She would of course become very possessive of her husband, and would become hysterical if her husband has affairs with other women.

She often becomes very jealous.

There is a strong belief among women folks of village communities in some oriental countries that:

(a) a chaste woman should develop menopause in her mid or at least late-forties, and

(b) if she continues to have menses further into her fifties, she is often branded as a 'bad' character, meaning thereby that she must have had sex with several men. 

It is indeed a sad accusation for a woman who did nothing wrong except to have enjoyed regular orgasmic pleasures with her husband.

With the exception of a very small, insignificant number, majority of the world women, especially in the oriental countries, are doubtlessly very chaste. 

Among them, as I have already pointed out, only a very few have been especially blessed to receive such an orgasmic pleasure from their husbands. 

It is unfortunte that these women, for want of comparison, often fail to appreciate the value of this rarity.

Identical to the same, the few husbands who know the art of satisfying their wives, do not know that they are the rare ones among men. 

This is so because not many of them are psychologists (like me!)  to understand rest of the world.

Keeping a wife satisfied this way all the time tends to be very demanding on the part of the husband. 

It would help a great deal in fostering the family if a wife could become appreciative of this fact as well. 

Another interesting observation I have made is worthy of mention here: 

Most of us are aware of a phenomenon that exists among animals. 

A peacock tends to perform very attractive dances to win its female partner. 

The males among all the animals such as lizards, beetles, butterflies, birds, lambs, bulls and deers try to show off their capabilities by various means to their female kinds to win them over. 

Somewhat identical phenomenon seems to exist among humans as well. 

All the men tend to put up their best to win their females.
However, there appears to exist some difference between those who are handsome and those who are not. 

Since women are easily attracted towards the handsome ones, the need to develop special skills does not arise, whereas the not-so-attractive men feel the necessity and they develop it accordingly. 

As a result of it, most of the handsome men tend not to be exploratory in the performance of sex acts. 

They usually lack imaginative power in the area of sex.

Often, the unattractive men prove to be the best performers. 

The latter group of men tend to give their partners the much needed orgasmic pleasures. 

Somewhat identical to the above, less attractive women married to handsome men, tend to exercise maximum care and provide their best to their husbands.       

A reader who is handsome and who also has a high degree of capability need not feel offended. 

Such a person, since blessed with the best of both worlds, certainly deserves to be congratulated!

When it comes to the women born very beautiful, and subjected to praise by all from childhood, also does not seem to contribute much to the husband by way of cooperation.

Instead, her expectations often tend to go so high up that she often gets disappointed with her husband! 

This is a psychological problem, indeed! 

Could this be a major reason for marital failures among females who are elected as beauty queens in stage events? 

From the psychological point of view, men and women who are mediocre or less in their appearance, seem to be the best contributors to their spouses! 

This should be the result of their constant search for compensating what they do not have in Nature.

Thus, as has already been pointed out, a mediocre woman marrying a handsome man tries her best to please him.

Similarly, a mediocre man marrying a beautiful woman offers equally a lot to keep her happy. 

A beautiful woman and a handsome man in the above combinations become mere recepients of the spouse's contributions, without much appreciation. 

They tend to believe that they deserve such a `royal' treatment!

When a handsome man marries a beautiful woman (as it happened in the case of one of my friends, a Ph.D. and a Professor in University), both of them tend to become very dull and unexplorative (- My frined and his wife never had any sex during the frist six months after their marriage!)

However, the on-lookers keep admiring them as if they are the perfect couple, made for each other! 

* * * * *  *  *  *

Let us now consider the fate of prostitutes who tend to have sex with several men, and therefore likely to get orgasm very often - at least during the early stages of her `career' and until she becomes `immune' to such sensitivity owing to over-indulgence. 

We can classify these women into two different categories:

   A prostitute who has sex with only four or five men per night, and indulges in her business for about 20 days in a month, has been regular for a prolonged period, and continues into her late fifties and early sixties, will not develop her menopause until about 70 or so.

On the other hand, one who has sex with a large number of men almost every night, for a prolonged period, tends to develop menopause very early. 

It could happen even in her mid or early thirties. 

This should be due to withdrawal of the hormones owing to excessive usage. 

There will not be any pre-coital secretions in these women. 

Even the orgasmic pleasures would cease to occur in them. 

A kind of 'bluntness' develops in their sex-related sensory organs. 

These are all withdrawal symptoms. 

Soon, they would become sterile.

Women who have orgasm most of the time they have sex, will have no difficulty when it comes to delivering their babies in a natural manner. 

This is so because of the influence of the sex-related hormones over the pelvic bones and various muscles in the vicinity. 

The orgasmic convulsions are directly related to the central nervous system.

A woman who gets orgasm through sexual relations will have her nervous tensions relaxed. 

On the other hand, those who have sex without attaining orgasms, tend to build up more and more tensions. 

This forms the major reason for married women to disagree with their husbands in various matters that are un-related to sex. 

Further, they tend to reject invitations to have frequent sex: after all, it only adds tension to them, rather than a release from it.  Frustration results.

Among Indians, the first nuptial night for a married couple after their wedding is called `Santhi Muhoortham'.

Literally, it means the attainment of mental peace.

However, it refers to a time chosen for the couple to have sex for the first time in their lives to achieve `santhi' or `release of nervous tension' (or, peace) that has been building up in them since they came to `age' or puberty. 

On this first night, the bride is supposed to get her orgasm and feel contended. 

For the man, it goes very easily with the release of his seminal fluid. 

The unfortunate part of the deal is that the bride not only on the nuptial night, but all throughout her lifetime, does not get her orgasm, just because of the man's ignorance.

If you are interested in finding if:

(a) a couple have been having regular sex, and

(b) if the wife has been getting her orgasmic pleasures,

all you have to do is to compare how both of them `look'.

If the husband looks a lot younger and the wife looks like his mother, then it would mean that both of them have been having regular sex, but the wife never, ever had orgasm.

If both of them  look old and worn-out, they have not been having any sex relation at all. 

If both of them look young, then she too has been getting her orgasm very regularly. 

Some may argue that the above is only one of the many reasons that help in the keeping up of the youthful looks. 

As per my observation, I am of the opinion that the extent to which a person attains sexual satisfaction forms the only major determinant of the youthful status of the physique. 

With the idea of finding the situation in Kuala Lumpur, I observed all the couples I have been coming across. 

The result was shocking: it appears only about five per cent of the couples looked very youthful. 

Among the rest, most of the women looked oldish, and their husbands looked very young. 

It may not be too difficult to judge what has been going on in these families. 

The next time you see a couple, just analyse the situation: no one would find it, and neither will it be an error! 

Just see yourself the unfortunate situation that prevails in the world of women. 

While doing the above analysis, one should evaluate only the looks of a person and not the total life span, for women in all societies tend to live longer than men. 

The latter of course has several other reasons behind it.

The failure to develop orgasmic satisfaction with a single act of sex, with a single partner, appears to be a kind of curse bestowed upon women for reasons so far not known to people (Of course, I know that, and I have described in my books). 

Why should a man come off so soon, whereas a woman takes such a prolonged time to get hers? 

There must be some reason for it in nature. 

This must be related to Nature's definite purpose of making a woman fertilised. 

After all, the ultimate purpose of Nature is to keep up continuity of the progeny. 

Otherwise, extinction of the species would result. 

Let us try and derive some meaningful biological explanations for this phenomenon that occurs in nature. 

The following should prove to be a sensible hypothesis, and I beg, no one should get offended:

When a man has already discharged his seminal fluid containing unbelievably large number of fertile sperms capable of fertilising the egg in the female body, he is not needed any more and his presence is redundant, at least when it concerns this particular female. 

With the union of one male, and with the discharge of a large number of sperms, if the female has failed to conceive, then the purpose of reproduction will be unnecessarily delayed. 

If the female has to get definitely fertilised with absolute certainty, then she must be capable of receiving few more supplies of such seminal fluids from other available males.

Now, this cannot happen if the female developed orgasm with one individual male. 

Nature's wish could be such that she must not become unavailable to other contributors. 

To this end, she should not get her satisfaction within the time required for the ejaculation of seminal fluids by one male, and she must become `available' to a few more males, and receive a few more lots of seminal fluids. 

This would then ascertain a positive fertilisation.

We should not forget that one man - one wife relationship is a man-made custom, created with a view to making available a woman to every man in the community. 

When it comes to Nature, it is an artificial kind of restriction. 

Nature does not recognise this social restriction.
Therefore, it still maintains the disparity in the timing for the development of orgasms between the sexes. 

Has the above view any analogy to cling on to? 

It appears the plants have something to offer us:

A female flower with its gynoecium remains open for a set number of hours.  It offers honey (nectar) to all the right kind of visiting insects. 

Insects, in the process of their search of food (honey), keep visiting flower after flower. 

While doing so, their body gets smeared with pollen grains, which are the equivalent of sperms, and these get transferred to the sticky tip of a female organ called stigma, which forms the receiving `mouth' for the pollen grains. 

A single insect could transfer this way a large number of pollen grains at one visit. 

The flower could close its doorway at this point. 

But it does not. 

The female flower still supplies its honey and keeps the stigma receptive to newer insect visitors and a few more `loads' of pollen grains. 

The stigma allows all such pollens to germinate and send down their male `sperms' to fertilise the egg. 

However, the moment one fast growing and most competitive `sperm' fertilises the egg, the flower immediately closes all its entry points and shuns away all other already-germinated pollens. 

This way, the egg makes absolutely certain of fertilisation, and that too with the best chosen one. 

Here the fittest survives.

If the flower closed its doorways on receiving one pollen grain, and if that pollen failed to fertilise the egg, then it would mean a total loss of the very flower.

Nature makes things foolproof.

If we are willing to accept this theory, then we could very well understand the time differences found among the two human (genders) sexes in attaining orgasmic satisfaction.

Our social pattern along with the communal living and artificially imposed restrictions we have been practising ever since we became `civilised' do not allow multiple sex relations. 

At the same time, we should not forget for a while that polyandry (The Hindu mythological story of five Pandavars + Throubathy) (and of course, polygamy) of different kinds did exist among humans at one time in the history of man.  

Whatever, as we live today practising one man - one wife relationship, every husband is duty-bound to make his wife happy the way she deserves it. 

To this end, God will not excuse those who do not justify the restricted married life, for every woman deserves the God-given happiness! 

If child-bearing and its delivery are painful events to a woman, God has given them unlimited pleasures in each orgasm as compensation. 

But, it is up to the man - the husband to give it to his wife, each and every time if possible!

* * * * * * * * * * *

Well friends, I hope you enjoyed knowing the above, exculsively my OWN research-based analysis of the situtaion.

No offence is meant to anyone. So, if you differ, kindly bear with me.

I have written a lot of very useful facts in my books:
1. Menses, Menopause, and Osteoporosis, and
2. Sex Problems: Causes, Cure and Prevention.

If interested, you can read them.

With best wishes and thanks for reading this article.

Dr. Palani, Ph.D.
.
.
.