STROKES AND HYPERTENSIONS TEND TO BE INTER-RELATED, AND THEY CAN BE CURED WITHOUT MEDICATIONS.

 STROKES AND HYPERTENSIONS TEND TO BE INTER-RELATED, AND THEY CAN BE CURED WITHOUT MEDICATIONS.

(© 30 October 2015: Dr.V.M.Palaniappan, Ph.D.)

Another article of interest, provided by European Society of Cardiology, has come out in yesterday’s Medical Xpress (29 October 2015). You may want to read it yourself through the following URL:

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-10-three-quarters-patients-china-hypertension.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=ctgr-item&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter

A Research Scientist, Dr. TANG in China has let known through an International Conference on heart health and related matters, held in Beijing, that:

“Three-quarters of stroke patients in China have hypertension”

The above result was learnt by studying large number of patients of about 63 years of age.

Of the more than 20 thousand patients they studied, two-thirds were MALE.

Of this, some 75% of the people had HYPERTENSION (i.e, high blood pressure).

Besides other health problems, some 37% of that 20 thousand people also had DIABETES.

Dr. Tang mentions that the Chinese often eat HIGH SALT, and that could be the risk factor for the prevalence of HYPERTENSION in STROKE patients.

Dr. Tang also attributes the LACK OF EXERCISE as one of a few more risk factors for the above two problems.

In this connection, Professor Dayi Hu, the President of China Heart Foundation has also expressed that SALT CONSUMPTION (+ smoking) should be the causative factor.

Professor Dayi Hu is of the opinion that China desperately needs to ban smoking (in public places), besides REDUCING SALT in processed foods.

Professor Michel Komaida, Director of ESC programme in China feels that it is important to promote better control of RISK FACTORS and also adoption of a HEALTHY LIFESTYLE.

************

The whole world has been repeatedly blaming SALT as the most important culprit that has been raising the blood pressure of people world-wide.

I attended a Heart Health Conference of the same kind held in Osaka, Japan, in 2001.
(International Conference on Preventive Cardiology + 4^th International Heart Health Conference, Osaka, Japan. 26-30 May, 2001)

In that conference, numerous heart specialists presented elaborate papers on the ill-effects of SALT. I WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO WAS OPPOSED TO IT – of course, naturally, no one bothered to care about my communication.

*******

Let us contemplate a little on this issue.

Why is it that ALL the Scientists worldwide are repeatedly emphasising the SALT is the most dangerous culprit, besides SUGAR, that are making people sick with many heart diseases?

Then, what make me alone to differ? Am I mad? Or, what has gone wrong me of not conforming with rest of the world?

Dear Friends,

Let me tell some of you who do not know me well:

I have a Ph.D., three Post-Doctoral research experiences in UK, USA, and the Philippines.

Further, I was an Academician in University of Malaya for 28 years, and I have guided some 56 research projects, published 167 papers (although only a few were peer-reviewed), given 60 TV Talk Shows on Health-care, posted 310 health-care articles in this BLOG.

I have researched for 40 years, and have founded completely a NEW, science and evidence-based alternative medicine. I have also successfully treated numerous health sufferers in Malaysia, Singapore and India during the past 40 years.

With all the above, I don’t think you want to suspect that I must have gone a crack.

If you believe that I should be in my senses, then, please believe that I AM RIGHT IN SAYING THAT SALT IS NOT THE CULPRIT for giving heart or blood-related diseases, (AND, SUGAR IS NOT THE CULPRIT FOR THE INITIATION OF TYPE-2 DIABETES).

Let me repeat: THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE ABSOLUTELY TRUE, and are based on intense clinical study as well, during the past 40 years!

Let me elaborate on the subject.

**********

Please evaluate the following simple logic:

If you add one teaspoon of salt in one glass of soup and drink, your blood is bound to receive a thick concentration of salt.

If you drink the same quantity (i.e., one teaspoon) of salt in one litre of soup, it will become OK and palatable, that you may want to say that it is just right, and that will not give you any hypertension.

If I add that one teaspoon of salt in TWO litres of soup, and make you drink all of it, you would say, it is “LOW SALT”, and that will NOT do any harm to you. YET, THIS EXCESSIVE WATER WOULD GIVE YOU, DOUBTLESSLY, LOW BLOOD PRESSURE.

The reality is:

In all the three cases, ONLY ONE TEASPOON OF SALT HAS GONE INTO YOUR BODY.

That being the case, how is it that, that is going to give you high blood pressure in one case, and that the second one is not going to give you the high B/P in another, and the third one, LOW B/P?

BEYOND ANY DOUBT, IT IS TRUE THAT:

1.   VERY LITTLE OR MUCH REDUCED WATER CONSUMPTION WOULD GIVE YOU HYPERTENSION.

2.   MEDIOCRE WATER INTAKE WOULD NOT GIVE ANY PROBLEM.

3.   EXCESSIVE WATER CONSUMPTION WOULD GIVE RISE TO LOW B/P, or HYPOtension.

·       Let us assume that YOU have been taking VERY LITTLE SALT, and have also been drinking VERY LITTLE WATER (e.g. just about 500 ml daily). In this case, you WILL definitely get HYPERTENSION.

Since you did not drink enough water, you will NOT be urinating well. The resulting UNDER-URINATION will leave behind in your body the same little salt – and that when repeated day after day, will accumulate to become PLENTY within the body, which would then give you the high B/P.

·       If you happen to take VERY LITTLE SALT, and drink PLENTY OF WATER (e.g, 3 L), then, because of the SALT INADEQUACY in the blood, you WILL DEFINITELY DEVELOP LOW B/P.

Even that little salt you took would have gone out of your body in the urine.

In both the above, please touch your urine with your finger tip while voiding, and taste it. (No harm will be done, scientifically-speaking.)

The urine you voided AFTER taking VERY LITTLE WATER, will taste VERY STRONGLY SALTY, whereas the urine sample AFTER drinking the 3 L water may not taste salt at all, if not very little.

**********

NOW,

What would be your observation? I mean, your conclusion?

Dear people, SALT IS NOT THE CULPRIT!

The culprit is NOT DRINKING ENOUGH WATER.

In other words, and to repeat:

Little water consumption would give hypertension – irrespective of the quantity of salt you take.

Plenty of water drinking would give you LOW pressure.

Mediocre water consumption, with NICE-TO-TASTE quantity of salt would keep your blood pressure perfectly at the mid-point!

*******

Wanting to test the above, when it was a HYPOTHESIS in my consideration, I consumed unbelievably LARGE QUANTITIES OF SALT.

At initial stages, I drank only about ONE LITRE of water daily.

A while later, the B/P went up.

Then, I continued to take the SAME quantity of salt (plenty of it!). But, in this season, I drank THREE LITRES of water daily. Then, I developed LOW B/P.

I went to a Western Medical Practitioner by name Dr. A, in his private clinic called “A… Dispensary”, located in Second Mile, Ipoh Road, Kuala Lumpur.

Can you guess what he advocated?

He charged me RM10.00 in 1963, and told me to try drinking BEER. I did what he said – until then I had never tasted beer at all! The result was, the B/P went much lower than what I had when I went to him for consultation!

Anyway, at a later date, upon recognising the relationship between water consumption and the dynamics of salt, I started drinking TWO Litres of water, and have been taking liberal quantities of SALT – keeping my taste bud as the GUARD to guide.

If a food tastes VERY NICE, then, THAT IS THE CORRECT QUANTITY OF SALT ONE SHOULD TAKE. Not to forget that this should be done while drinking about 2 or 2.5 L of water!

Fine.

My Blood Pressure until this day, it has been 129/73, and the Pulse, 67. (The highest Systolic recorded was 139, while the lowest was 115. The Pulse has been fluctuating between 65 and 75, or so.

I am still available for anyone to test upon me.

************

So, friends,

If two million Mathematics Professors are saying 2 + 2 = 3, if I alone - just only one individual, keep saying that 2 + 2 = 4, only I should be correct. In this kind of cases, the majority need not be correct!

Yet, we should certainly respect the Professors for their intense knowledge - people can wrong in one or two things, here and there. So, we should not under-estimate the Research Scientists who have expressed slightly misunderstood interpretations.

**********

What is your ‘verdict’ on the research results of Dr. TANG in China.

If your happen to be the Health-care Authority in China, what would you do?

Would you impose restrictions for salt reduction if the manufactured foods, or would you preach through mass media telling the people to drink more water, and urinate more?

Do you think, I should politely suggest to Professor Dayi Hu, the President of China Heart Foundation, not to recommend salt reduction, but to increase water consumption and urination?

I think, with due respect to Professor Michel Komaida, the so-called HEALTHY LIFESTYLE suggested by him should be modified to tell the people TO TAKE MORE SALT, AND ALSO TO DRINK MORE WATER AND to URINATE MORE AS WELL.

*********
In my opinion, China is one country which will definitely implement any suggestion, if they are sure that that suggestion is good for the people, and they will equally definitely SUCCEED, for they seem to be doing what they do with full sincerity.

Therefore, I have a request to Professor Dayi Hu,  Professor. Michel Komaida, and Dr.Tang:

Dear Professors,

Kindly put ALL my findings to test in your Country, probably by carrying out a large-scale coordinated research programme on all of my findings.

Upon tracing the truth, kindly recommend to the Ministry of Health in China for the implementation of what I have suggested in all of my BOOKS (what you have confirmed), so that the whole lot of people in China would lead an almost-totally a disease-free healthy life.

I will be very happy, if you wish, to coordinate in the research programme.

In the end, all I need from you will be just an official recognition that I am the PIONEERING FOUNDER of all those wonderful findings, and that they are all correct.

Such a recognition will enhance the spreading of my findings world-wide for all the people on earth to benefit.

(Kindly Note: Several of my postings in this BLOG, have references to all my books.

My website: www.ehealingsystem.com has my EXTENDED BIODATA, which has a complete listing of all my publications.) 

********

Now, to continue from what I have left earlier:

The heading for this article I have given reads as: 

STROKES AND HYPERTENSIONS TEND TO BE INTER-RELATED ALL THE TIME, AND THEY CAN BE EASILY CURED WITHOUT MEDICATIONS.

Can you guess why have changed the title this way?

It is because,

1. When people UNDER-URINATE, the SALT, however little they take with food, tends to get concentrated in the blood stream, thus giving rise to THICKENING OF THE BLOOD,clotting, etc. (for which the Doctors may prescribe Aspirin, Warfarin, Heparin, Lovenox, Cardipine, Nicardipine, and the like).  This way they try to keep the blood in a THIN state, and to help avoid clots, clogging up, strokes, heart attacks, etc.

Of course, the right approach should be to make the person drink MORE water - that is all to it, and for sure that will thin the blood, making blood thinner medications redundant.

When blood gets THICK, the total VOLUME of the blood in the entire body gets REDUCED. So, the brain, in order to maintain the blood flow, INCREASES THE PRESSURE, thus giving rise to HYPERTENSION.

When the patient is made to drink MORE water all the time, the blood becomes normalised (i.e., thin), and the B/P returns to its original normal. (We now know that too much of water consumption will result in LOW B/P.) 

2. When a person UNDER-URINATES, the CALCIUM EXCESSES from within the body that are supposed to get out as part of the urine, will NOT be able to get leached out.

That 'CONSERVES' the Calcium EXCESSES within the body, resulting in greater accumulations.

This CALICUM, CALCIFIES the WALL of the blood VESSELS, thus narrowing the LUMEN - the tube. This is called Atherosclerosis or Arteriosclerosis.

This too will INCREASE the blood's PRESSURE, further increasing the HYPERTENSION.

IF THE CALCIFICATION HAPPENS TO BLOCK a TINY blood vessel in the BRAIN, blood supply, and thereby the OXYGEN supply will get cut off. THAT will give rise to STROKES.

So, if a person UNDER-URINATES, naturally, that person will get BOTH the HYPERTENSION and STROKES.

If the under-urination is not too bad, and/or if the water consumption is not too little, then the patient may NOT develop blood vessel blockage in the brain, but would only get hypertension. This is precisely why differences occur among people.

********

At this, you may want to ask was why should I emphasise that people should take MORE SALT?

This has greater relevance.

SALT, otherwise called SODIUM CHLORIDE is an important ELECTROLYTE.

ADEQUATE salt (not less) is a must for the transmission of pulse or news to all other parts of the body through the NERVES.

If you do not take enough salt, your brain’s transmission or working capacity can go LOW – to a substandard working.

To be intelligent to FULL CAPACITY, you MUST take ENOUGH SALT, and NOT LESS!

***********

Friends, while writing all the above TRUTH, I have to also say that following, so that I will not get into any problem with the LAW:

DISCLAIMER; All the above information is meant only for research and thinking purposes.

If you want to take more salt, you must first get the approval of a Registered Medical Practitioner, who should be qualified in Western medicine, and not based on my research findings – NOT UNTIL THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION (W.H.O) RECOGNISES MY FINDINGS AS THE BEST HEALTH-CARE METHOD FOR THE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE.

I believe, the W.H.O. would soon recognise all my findings in this newly founded discipline of Ecological Healing System / EcoTherapy (EHS).

Naturally, you can expect the entire world population to live happily without any disease, from then on.

I know that is what God’s intention is, and therefore, it will happen very soon – in the course of this year!

Thanks for reading this, and with best wishes,

Dr. Palani, Ph.D.

INTENSE SUNSHINE WOULD POSITIVELY INCREASE BONE WEIGHT IN CHILDREN

(© 24 October 2015: Dr. V. M. Palaniappan, Ph.D.)

I have reported through several of my publications (Palaniappan, 1998-2015) the following details:

*  Basically, it is CALCIUM that contributes to BODY WEIGHT of young and old, and NOT fat as has been misconceived by most people.

*  If the person exposes his body to INTENSE SUNSHINE, the Calcium would get impregnated into the skeletal system, and would increase its DENSITY.

This happens because of the Vitamin-D that is produced by the skin pigments when exposed to sunlight. (The extent to which artificial indoor lights would affect remains to be studied.)

*  If the person takes synthetic Vitamin-D, identical results would happen.

*  If the person does NOT expose his/her body to sunshine, and also abstains from taking Vitamin-D, the Calcium does NOT become part of the bones, but would enter into the SOFT CELLS all over the body, and THAT would increase the overall body weight of the person. 

In that process, the muscles would lose their ‘tenderness’, and would turn ‘tougher’.  In other words, the Calf Hardness (cH) increases (Palaniappan, 2000).

Those soft cells would divide mitotically to accommodate if the Calcium accumulation happens to continue, and that can become a LUMP or TUMOUR in breast or any other part of the body that is made of soft cells.

Calcium accumulation would occur because of: (a) under-urination, (b) defecating slimy / watery faeces, (c) excessive consumption of chocolates, biscuits, calcium-enriched eatables and drinks, (d) drinking alkaline water, and (e) calcium supplements (Palaniappan, 2013).

Continued Calcium accumulation, far beyond the tolerance limit of the body, would end up developing the benign lump / tumour into a cancer structure.

Yet more addition of Calcium through the same path would make it ‘spread’ to other organs as well. (In reality, Metastasis is only a simultaneous development of cancers in different organs).

I have already reported the above findings as early as in 1998 (Palaniappan, 1998).

*************

Ms Cassandra Pattinson, the PhD student and her colleagues who have recently released their findings to the Press, may want to refer to my publications before presenting their paper in any of International Conventions.

You may want to read the following news in this connection:

Study links light exposure to weight gain in children

(By Ms. Amanda Weaver, Medical Xpress, 23 October 2015)

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-10-links-exposure-weight-gain-children.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=ctgr-item&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter 

 *    *   *   *   *   *

According to the news (provided by the Queensland University of Technology), Ms. Cassandra Pattinson, a PhD student and her colleagues studied 48 children, measuring each child's sleep, activity and light exposure along with their height and weight.

They found:  

• Moderate intensity light exposure earlier in the day was associated with increased body mass index (BMI).
• 
  
• Children who received biggest dose of light in the afternoon were slimmer.
• 
  
• Physical activity was not associated with the body mass of the children. 
• 
  
• This was the first time light has been shown to contribute to weight in children.
• 
  
•  Pre-school children exposed to morning light tend to be heavier. (Dr.Palani: This could be due to the children consuming calcium-rich dairy products in the morning hours).
•   
• According to them: Factors that impact on obesity include calorie intake, decreased physical activity, short sleep duration, and variable sleep timing. Now light can be added to the mix. (Dr. Palani: Calcium accumulation, essentially due to under-urination should be included in the list as the major contributor: For more details, please see my publicatons.)
•   
• It seems they are planning to conduct further studies with pre-schoolers and also infants. (Dr. Palani: I would suggest to include the influence of Calcium Accumulation and its role in causing the obesity under different conditions. This should reveal much meaningful information.)
• 
  
  *********
  Well, friends, 
• 
  
  If you have any opinion on the subject, please feel free to post your comments. 
• 
  
  With best wishes, 
• 
  
  Dr.Palani. Ph.D.  
•                                                    
• References: 

1. Palaniappan, V.M. 1998. Obesity: causes, cure, and prevention. Ecohealth Snd. Bhd. Pub., ISBN 978-967-9988-05-8. 471 pp. 

2. Palaniappan, V.M. 2000. Health problems: diagnose yourself. Ecohealth Snd. Bhd. Pub., ISBN 978-967-9988-06-6. 148 pp. 

3.  Palaniappan, V.M., 2001. Heart problems, diabetes, and related diseases. Ecohealth Sdn. Bhd. Pub., ISBN 978-967-9988-08-6. 287 pp. 

4.  Palaniappan, V.M. 2008. THE TRUE CAUSES OF ALL DISEASES. Neo Health Care: ISBN 978-967-9988-13-0. 192pp. Also available as e-books in KINDLE & AMAZON.COM. 

5.  Palaniappan, V.M. 2010. Cancer: causes, cure, and prevention. Neo Health Care. 624 pp. 

7.  Palaniappan, V.M 2013. All about obesity in a nutshell. Neo Health Care. ISBN 978-967-9988-18-5. 221 pp.