HIGH DIABETIC RISK FOR
SEDENTARY WOMEN
(© 2011, 29 Feb., 2012: Dr.
V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D )
The following news appeared in Diabetes News, on February 24, 2012. This news was reported by
You can read it at:
The source being ANI, this finding
was published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
Risk of Type 2 Diabetes High for Women Who Sit for Up to 7 Hrs a Day
The title is self-explanatory.
If you are a woman, and if you
happen to sit up to 7 hours daily, you can develop Type-2 Diabetes.
Apparently, no such relationship
was found in men, and the reason for this was not clear to the researchers who
studied this subject in University of Leicester, England.
However,
they found that those women who sat longest had higher levels of insulin (that
helps in the digestion of sugar in the body), indicating the onset of insulin
resistance.
They have recorded higher readings of chemicals released by fatty tissue in the
abdomen, and that indicated the possibility of inflammation.
Again,
even this result was absent in men.
MY INTERPRETATION & EXPLANATION FOR
THE ABOVE PHENOMENON:
If
you read my book “Diabetes: Causes, Cure and Prevention”, you will get to know
why all the auto-immune diseases develop.
I
have explained as why the specific cells (called Beta-cells) in the Pancreas fail
to secrete insulin, and thereby give rise to Type-1 Diabetes.
Anyway,
we are more concerned with the main theme of the story, which says that women
sitting for prolonged periods tend to develop Type-2 Diabetes and also
inflammation due to the release of chemicals from fatty tissues.
AS
PER MY STUDY, THE EXACT REASON FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TYPE-2 DIABETES IS, VERY
CLEARLY, UNDER-URINATION.
Men
and women, both genders, would develop type-2 diabetes, if they happen to
under-urinate all the time.
In
this study in Leicester University, they have found that only the women are
prone to the problem, and not men.
If
they have monitored the number (or the quantity) of urinations among both
genders during this experiment, I am almost certainly sure that they could have
had the answers for their questions.
They
would have found the MEN urinating relatively more number of times during the
sitting period, and the women must have withheld the urinal pressure during the
entire period of sitting on the chairs.
Naturally,
when one under-urinates, the EXCESSIVE calcium that is supposed to have gone
out of the body through the urine, would stay within the body.
I
have explained in great detail in my Diabetes book as how CALCIUM behaves like
SUGAR in the body of humans, all animals and even plants.
****************
How
do sugarcanes produce sugar?
Do you add at their roots sugars as fertilizer?
You only add CALCIUM there.
It is calcium that provides the sugar in the plant.
Same is the story with ALL the sweet-tasting fruits, whether that be mango or banana, or whatever!
(In the absence of calcium in the soil, the soil would turn to become acidic, and thereby lose its fertility.
All the fruits harvested from plants growing in acid soils would taste sour, and not sweet.
In fact, if you want to sweeten any sour fruit, sour mango for instance, all you have to do is to scratch the scar left due to the detachment of the stalk of the unripe mango, and rub over it some diluted lime (i.e., Calcium hydroxide = quicklime / burnt lime. Small number of people in India, Malaysia, Indonesia and the like rub this lime over betel leaf and chew), wrap it in a newspaper, and leave it to ripen. It would then turn sweet when ripe!
The above finding is the result of my own research!
I have reported this information in my book "Diabetes:
Causes, Cure and Prevention" (Palaniappan, 2011) for the first time.
It has never been found or reported by any biologist, in any part of the world, and at any time until now!.
I hope the Horticulture/ Agriculture community will give me due credit for this finding.)
Again, the basic product behind the production of all carbohydrates in plants is CALCIUM, and not sugar itself.
So, if you eat sugar, you will NOT develop TYPE-2 Diabetes.
However, if you eat excessive calcium, there is room for it.
(EXCESSIVE
sugar consumption will induce unlimited production of insulin in the pancreas,
and will, at its threshold point, ceases to produce insulin anymore , and that gives
rise to the so-called AUTO-IMMUNE disease, and TYPE-1 INSULIN-DEPENDENT
DIABETES MELLITUS),
So,
naturally, if the men have been urinating more or less once in two or three
hours, they would not have had any change in their blood sugar content or
insulin production.
The same reason should be behind the production of chemicals by the fatty tissue in the abdomen.
In the frequently-urinating men, the chemicals could have gone out of the body by way getting leached through the urination.
Whereas, if the women did not urinate, naturally, similar to the accumulation of calcium, these harmful chemicals too could have stayed within the body, thus giving rise to inflammation.
(Most of the water-soluble chemicals would get depleted through urinations. Only water-insoluble substances would stay within the body even if the person urinates liberally.)
I strongly believe my interpretation is correct.
If in doubt, or for re-evaluation of my interpretations, the researchers in Leicester University can repeat their experiment, recording this time the number of urinations (plus the quantities of water consumed and voided), and re-evaluate the data.
They will then come up with approval for my interpretations.
Will
they do it, and then accept their short-comings in leaving out some data, and
also give me due recognition?
Let us see, and I hope that they will do it, for I am aware that researchers in England are honest, and they do not hesitate to accept errors and shortcomings.
I have observed them to be so when I was in University of Liverpool, doing my post-doctoral research there with
OK,
friends,
Bye
until next.