Dr.V.M.Palaniappan, Ph.D.

Featured Post

SEE MY SPECIAL APPROACH FOR AN IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION OF A ‘PREMATURE’ AND BREAKTHROUGH HEALTHSCIENCE DISCOVERY, THAT WAS ‘RESISTED’ ALL THIS WHILE

SEE MY SPECIAL APPROACH FOR AN IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION OF A ‘ PREMATURE ’  AND BREAKTHROUGH  HEALTH SCIENCE  DISCOVERY , THAT ...

Your needs / Objectives / Indemnification

After reading my articles, if you are convinced of their worthiness/ usefulness, you may want to kindly spread the news to your friends suggesting to read what you had read.

My ambition is to reach out to the World Health Organisation, so that my findings will become useful to people worldwide.
'
I will be happy to cooperate / coordinate with any scientist for the furtherance of my findings.

I am extremely THANKFUL to GOOGLE for their fantastic and free services all the time, for reaching out to the public at large.


Indemnification: All my articles are based on MY OWN research, and I strongly believe that they are true. I have been requesting the W.H.O. and Malaysian Ministry of Health to evaluate my discoveries. Until they are approved for use, the Readers of all my articles should get the approval of a Registered Medical Practitioner prior to practising them, and I should not be held responsible for any mishap at all.





With best wishes and thanks,
Dr. Palani, Ph.D.




Ecological Healing System

ALL THE TIME: Popular Posts

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

HIGH DIABETIC RISK FOR SEDENTARY WOMEN


HIGH DIABETIC RISK FOR 

SEDENTARY WOMEN

(© 2011, 29 Feb., 2012: Dr. V.M. Palaniappan, Ph.D)

The following news appeared in Diabetes News, on February 24, 2012. This news was reported by Savitha C Muppala

You can read it at:

The source being ANI, this finding was published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Risk of Type 2 Diabetes High for Women Who Sit for Up to 7 Hrs a Day

The title is self-explanatory.

If you are a woman, and if you happen to sit up to 7 hours daily, you can develop Type-2 Diabetes. 

Apparently, no such relationship was found in men, and the reason for this was not clear to the researchers who studied this subject in University of Leicester, England.

However, they found that those women who sat longest had higher levels of insulin (that helps in the digestion of sugar in the body), indicating the onset of insulin resistance.

They have recorded higher readings of chemicals released by fatty tissue in the abdomen, and that indicated the possibility of inflammation.

Again, even this result was absent in men.

MY INTERPRETATION & EXPLANATION FOR THE ABOVE PHENOMENON:

If you read my book “Diabetes: Causes, Cure and Prevention”, you will get to know why all the auto-immune diseases develop.

I have explained as why the specific cells (called Beta-cells) in the Pancreas fail to secrete insulin, and thereby give rise to Type-1 Diabetes.

Anyway, we are more concerned with the main theme of the story, which says that women sitting for prolonged periods tend to develop Type-2 Diabetes and also inflammation due to the release of chemicals from fatty tissues.

AS PER MY STUDY, THE EXACT REASON FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TYPE-2 DIABETES IS, VERY CLEARLY, UNDER-URINATION.

Men and women, both genders, would develop type-2 diabetes, if they happen to under-urinate all the time.

In this study in Leicester University, they have found that only the women are prone to the problem, and not men.

If they have monitored the number (or the quantity) of urinations among both genders during this experiment, I am almost certainly sure that they could have had the answers for their questions.

They would have found the MEN urinating relatively more number of times during the sitting period, and the women must have withheld the urinal pressure during the entire period of sitting on the chairs.

Naturally, when one under-urinates, the EXCESSIVE calcium that is supposed to have gone out of the body through the urine, would stay within the body.

I have explained in great detail in my Diabetes book as how CALCIUM behaves like SUGAR in the body of humans, all animals and even plants.

****************
How do sugarcanes produce sugar?

Do you add at their roots sugars as fertilizer?

You only add CALCIUM there.

It is calcium that provides the sugar in the plant.

Same is the story with ALL the sweet-tasting fruits, whether that be mango or banana, or whatever!

(In the absence of calcium in the soil, the soil would turn to become acidic, and thereby lose its fertility.

All the fruits harvested from plants growing in acid soils would taste sour, and not sweet.

In fact, if you want to sweeten any sour fruit, sour mango for instance, all you have to do is to scratch the scar left due to the detachment of the stalk of the unripe mango, and rub over it some diluted lime (i.e., Calcium hydroxide = quicklime / burnt lime.  Small number of  people in India, Malaysia, Indonesia and the like rub this lime over betel leaf and chew), wrap it in a newspaper, and leave it to ripen. It would then turn sweet when ripe!

The above finding is the result of my own research! 
 
I have reported this information in my book "Diabetes: 
Causes, Cure and Prevention" (Palaniappan, 2011) for the first time.

It has never been found or reported by any biologist, in any part of the world, and at any time until now!.

I hope the Horticulture/ Agriculture community will give me due credit for this finding.) 

Again, the basic product behind the production of all carbohydrates in plants is CALCIUM, and not sugar itself.

So, if you eat sugar, you will NOT develop TYPE-2 Diabetes. 
However, if you eat excessive calcium, there is room for it.

(EXCESSIVE sugar consumption will induce unlimited production of insulin in the pancreas, and will, at its threshold point, ceases to produce insulin anymore , and that gives rise to the so-called AUTO-IMMUNE disease, and TYPE-1 INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS),

So, naturally, if the men have been urinating more or less once in two or three hours, they would not have had any change in their blood sugar content or insulin production.

The same reason should be behind the production of chemicals by the fatty tissue in the abdomen.

In the frequently-urinating men, the chemicals could have gone out of the body by way getting leached through the urination.

Whereas, if the women did not urinate, naturally, similar to the accumulation of calcium, these harmful chemicals too could have stayed within the body, thus giving rise to inflammation.

(Most of the water-soluble chemicals would get depleted through urinations. Only water-insoluble substances would stay within the body even if the person urinates liberally.)

I strongly believe my interpretation is correct.

If in doubt, or for re-evaluation of my interpretations, the researchers in Leicester University can repeat their experiment, recording this time the number of urinations (plus the quantities of water consumed and voided), and re-evaluate the data. 

They will then come up with approval for my interpretations.

Will they do it, and then accept their short-comings in leaving out some data, and also give me due recognition?

Let us see, and I hope that they will do it, for I am aware that researchers in England are honest, and they do not hesitate to accept errors and shortcomings. 

I have observed them to be so when I was in University of Liverpool, doing my post-doctoral research there with Professor A.D. Bradshaw, the eminent Ecologist.

OK, friends,
Bye until next.
Dr. Palani.